| Literature DB >> 28567033 |
Abstract
Sugarcane-molasses-based post-methanated distillery waste is well known for its toxicity, causing adverse effects on aquatic flora and fauna. Here, it has been demonstrated that there is an abundant mixture of androgenic and mutagenic compounds both in distillery sludge and leachate. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis showed dodecanoic acid, octadecanoic acid, n-pentadecanoic acid, hexadecanoic acid, β-sitosterol, stigmasterol, β-sitosterol trimethyl ether, heptacosane, dotriacontane, lanosta-8, 24-dien-3-one, 1-methylene-3-methyl butanol, 1-phenyl-1-propanol, 5-methyl-2-(1-methylethyl) cyclohexanol, and 2-ethylthio-10-hydroxy-9-methoxy-1,4 anthraquinone as major organic pollutants along with heavy metals (all mg kg-1): Fe (2403), Zn (210.15), Mn (126.30, Cu (73.62), Cr (21.825), Pb (16.33) and Ni (13.425). In a simultaneous analysis of bacterial communities using the restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) method the dominance of Bacillus sp. followed by Enterococcus sp. as autochthonous bacterial communities growing in this extremely toxic environment was shown, indicating a primary community for bioremediation. A toxicity evaluation showed a reduction of toxicity in degraded samples of sludge and leachate, confirming the role of autochthonous bacterial communities in the bioremediation of distillery waste in situ.Entities:
Keywords: Bacillus sp.; Enterococcus sp.; RFLP; distillery sludge; toxicity; β-sitosterol
Year: 2017 PMID: 28567033 PMCID: PMC5434103 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00887
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Physico-chemical analysis of disposed distillery sludge and leachate.
| S. No. | Physico-chemical Parameters | Distillery sludgel | Distillery sludge leachate | Sludge leachate after | % Reduction ofsludge leachate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | pH | 8.00 @ 0.21 l | 7.99 @ 0.10 | 7.114 @ 0.21ˆa | 10.96 |
| 2 | EC | 4.1 @ 2.11 l | 3.9 @ 1.14 | 2.4 @ 1.34ˆa | 38.46 |
| 3 | Sodium (Na+) | 56 @ 1.31 l | 55.108 @ 0.97 | 13.352 @ 0.80ˆa | 75.77 |
| 4 | Chloride (Cl-) | 1825 @ 0.10 l | 7034.6. @ 0.89 | 6878.674 @ 129.45ˆns | 83.14 |
| 5 | Nitrate (NO3-) | 110 @ 3.14 l | 109.916 @ 1.30 | 46.295 @ 0.90ˆa | 57.88 |
| 6 | Ammonical nitrogen (NH4+) | 190 @ 1.24 l | 187.794 @ 0.94 | 85.594 @ 0.71ˆa | 54.42 |
| 7 | TDS | – | 16550.4 @ 2.07 | 2406 @ 89.19ˆa | 85.56 |
| 8 | BOD | – | 11050.2 @ 2.28 | 2555.698 @ 1.78ˆa | 76.87 |
| 9 | COD | – | 22421 @ 1.58 | 4512.934 @ 1.90ˆa | 79.87 |
| 10 | Total organic carbon | 17.318 @ 0.21 l | 16.404 @ 0.28 | 7.407 @ 1.09ˆa | 66.48 |
| 11 | Total nitrogen | 2.463 @ 0.01 l | 2.084 @ 0.04 | 1.982 @ 0.05ˆc | 57.29 |
| 12 | Total hydrogen | 4.013 @ 0.04 l | 3.668 @ 0.38 | 2.93 @ 0.05ˆc | 69.41 |
| 13 | Total oxygen | 36.251 @ 1.11 l | 35.408 @ 0.58 | 26.039 @ 3.52ˆb | 9.42 |
| 14 | Trace elements | l | |||
| a | Iron (Fe) | 2403 @ 3.11 l | 1401.22 @ 1.86 | 852.528 @ 2.05ˆa | 39.15 |
| b | Zinc (Zn) | 210.15 @ 2.14 l | 95.273 @ 0.68 | 21.463 @ 1.67ˆa | 77.47 |
| c | Copper (Cu) | 73.62 @ 1.14 l | 62.928 @ 1.20 | 11.526 @ 1.02ˆa | 81.68 |
| d | Chromium (Cr) | 21.825 @ 0.41 l | 18.447 @ 0.60 | 9.140 @ 0.49ˆa | 50.45 |
| e | Cadmium (Cd) | 1.440 @ 0.12 l | 1.166 @ 0.15 | 0.94 @ 0.05ˆc | 19.38 |
| f | Manganese (Mn) | 126.30 @ 0.94 l | 94.602 @ 1.13 | 45.105 @ 0.72ˆa | 52.32 |
| g | Nickel (Ni) | 13.425 @ 0.21 l | 8.302 @ 0.31 | 2.250 @ 0.20ˆa | 72.89 |
| h | Lead (Pb) | 16.33 @ 1.11 l | 14.311 @ 1.65 | 7.222 @ 0.38ˆa | 49.53 |
Identified organic compounds by GC-MS present in n-hexane extract of distillery sludge and leachate.
| S. No. | RT | Name of compound | DS | DSLC | DSLD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7.33 | 1-Propanol, 3-(octadecycloxy) | – | + | + |
| 2 | 8.15 | 2-Methyl-4-keto pentan-2-OL | + | + | – |
| 3 | 8.16 | + | + | + | |
| 5 | 10.41 | Trisiloxane, 1,1,1,5,5,5-hexamethyl-3,3-bis[(trimethylsilyl)oxy]-(CAS) | – | + | – |
| 6 | 11.13 | 1-Methylene-3-methyl-butanol | + | – | – |
| 7 | 12.46 | Benzene, 1,3-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl) | + | + | – |
| 8 | 12.86 | Phosphoric acid | + | + | – |
| 9 | 12.68 | 3,7-Dioxa-2,8-disilanonane, 2,2,8,8-tetramethyl-5-[(TMS)oxy | – | – | + |
| 10 | 13.55 | Docosanoic acid, docosyl ester | – | + | + |
| 11 | 13.74 | 2-Isoropyl-5-methyl-1-heptanol | + | – | |
| 12 | 14.84 | 1-Phenyl-1-propanol | + | + | – |
| 13 | 15.70 | Tetradecane | + | – | – |
| 14 | 16.69 | Tert-Hexadecanethiol | – | – | + |
| 15 | 17.23 | Decane, 2,3,5,8-tetramethyl | + | + | – |
| 16 | 17.50 | Propanoic acid | + | + | – |
| 17 | 18.47 | Benzoic acid, 3,5-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-hydroxy ethyl ester | – | – | + |
| 18 | 19.12 | 1-Dodecanol | + | – | – |
| 19 | 19.73 | Docosane | + | + | – |
| 20 | 20.73 | Dodecanoic acid | + | – | – |
| 21 | 21.62 | Heptacosane | + | + | – |
| 22 | 22.13 | Dotriacontane | + | + | – |
| 23 | 22.63 | 1-Hexadecanol, 2-methyl | – | – | + |
| 24 | 23.01 | Tert-Hexadecanethiol | + | – | – |
| 25 | 24.24 | Tetradecanoic acid | + | + | – |
| 26 | 25.28 | + | + | – | |
| 27 | 27.15 | Hexadecanoic acid, TMS ester | + | + | – |
| 28 | 28.63 | Palmidrol | – | – | + |
| 29 | 30.34 | Octadecanoic acid | + | + | – |
| 30 | 31.85 | Hexanedioic acid, bis(2-ethylhexyl ester) | – | + | + |
| 31 | 34.71 | Quercetin 7,3’,4’-trimethoxy | – | + | |
| 32 | 35.08 | 1H-Purin-6-amine, [(fluorophenyl)methyl | – | + | + |
| 33 | 35.09 | 2-Monostearin TMS ether | – | – | + |
| 34 | 35.91 | 2,6,10,14,18,22-Tetracosahexane 2,6,10,18,19,23-hexamethyl | + | + | – |
| 35 | 37.41 | Butyl 11-eicosenoate | – | – | + |
| 36 | 41.33 | Stigmasta-5,22-dien-3-ol(3β,22E) | + | + | – |
| 37 | 41.55 | Stigmasterol | + | + | – |
| 38 | 42.14 | Lanosta-8, 24 dien-3-one | + | + | – |
| 39 | 42.61 | 1-Monolinoleoylglycerol TMS ether | – | – | + |
| 40 | 42.40 | Spirostan-3-one (5α, 20β, 25R) | + | – | + |
| 41 | 42.66 | β-Sitosterol trimethyl ether | + | + | – |
Effect of different concentration of distillery sludge leachate on seedling growth of Phaseolus mungo L.
| Concentration (%) | Germination (%) | Relative toxicity (%) | Radical length (cm) | Germination index | Phytotoxicity (%) | Stress tolerance index | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Untreated | Treated | Untreated | Treated | Untreated | Treated | Untreated | Treated | Untreated | Treated | Untreated | Treated | |
| 1 | 100 @ 0.00± | 100 @ 0.00 | 00 @ 00 ± | 00 @ 0.00 | 1.9 @ 0.04 ± | 2.00 @ 0.01ˆa | 0.95 @ 0.10± | 1.0 @ 0.08ˆa | 5.0 @ 0.01 ± | 00 @ 00ˆns | 0.95 @ 0.02± | 1.00 @ 0.01ˆns |
| 2.5 | 90 @ 0.00 ± | 100 @ 0.00 | 10 @ 0.00 ± | 00 @ 00 | 0.75 @ 0.02± | 2.00 @ 0.02ˆa | 0.33 @ 0.02± | 1.0 @ 0.01ˆa | 62.50 @ 2.77± | 00 @ 00ˆa | 0.37 @ 0.01± | 1.00 @ 0.04ˆa |
| 5.0 | 78 @ 0.00 ± | 90 @ 0.00 | 22 @ 0.00 ± | 10 @ 0.00 | 0.50 @ 0.04± | 1.9 @ 0.02ˆa | 0.19 @ 0.00± | 0.85 @ 0.00ˆa | 75 @ 2.98 ± | 5.0 @ 1.4ˆa | 0.25 @ 0.03± | 0.95 @ 0.00ˆa |
| 10 | NG | 85 @ 0.00 | NG | 15 @ 0.00 | NG | 1.1 @ 0.01ˆa | NG | 0.46 @ 0.00ˆa | NG | 45 @ 1.2ˆa | NG | 0.55 @ 0.00ˆa |
| Control | 100 @ 00 ± | 100 @ 00 | 00 @ 00 ± | 00 @ 00 | 2.00 @ 0.10± | 2.00 @ 0.18ˆns | 00 @ 00 ± | 00 @ 00 | 00 @ 00 ± | 00 @ 00 | 00 @ 00 ± | 00 @ 00 |
Mitotic index and mitotic inhibition at different concentration of distillery sludge leachate.
| PMDS leachate concentration (%) | Total no. of cells | Total no. of dividing cell | Mitotic index (%) | Mitotic inhibition (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Untreated | Treated | Untreated | Treated | Untreated | Treated | Untreated | Untreated | |
| 1.0 | 2500 | 2500 | 415 @ 20.75± | 551 @ 19.28ˆa | 16.6 @ 0.74 ± | 22.04 @ 0.90ˆa | 28.93 @ 1.27± | 5.65 @ 0.19ˆa |
| 2.5 | 2500 | 2500 | 258 @ 12.38± | 475 @ 18.05ˆa | 10.32 @ 0.36± | 19.00 @ 0.86ˆa | 55.82 @ 1.95± | 18.66 @ 0.55ˆa |
| 5.0 | 2500 | 2500 | 167 @ 8.14 ± | 315 @ 35.12ˆa | 6.68 @ 0.24 ± | 12.6 @ 0.44ˆa | 71.40 @ 3.28± | 46.06 @ 1.42ˆa |
| 10 | 2500 | 2500 | 75 @ 2.25 ± | 269 @ 9.14ˆa | 3.0 @ 0.12 ± | 10.76 @ 0.40ˆa | 87.15 @ 4.00± | 53.93 @ 1.94ˆa |
| Control | 2500 | 2500 | 584 @ 28.61± | 584 @ 27.51ˆns | 23.36 @ 0.93± | 23.36 @ 1.14ˆns | – | – |