| Literature DB >> 29867864 |
Ram Chandra1, Pooja Sharma1, Sangeeta Yadav1, Sonam Tripathi1.
Abstract
Effluent discharged from the pulp and paper industry contains various refractory and androgenic compounds, even after secondary treatment by activated processes. Detailed knowledge is not yet available regarding the properties of organic pollutants and methods for their bioremediation. This study focused on detecting residual organic pollutants of pulp and paper mill effluent after biological treatment and assessing their degradability by biostimulation. The major compounds identified in the effluent were 2,3,6-trimethylphenol, 2-methoxyphenol (guaiacol), 2,6-dimethoxyphenol (syringol), methoxycinnamic acid, pentadecane, octadecanoic acid, trimethylsilyl ester, cyclotetracosane, 5,8-dimethoxy-6-methyl-2,4-bis(phenylmethyl)napthalen-1-ol, and 1,2-benzendicarboxylic acid diisononyl ester. Most of these compounds are classified as endocrine-disrupting chemicals and environmental toxicants. Some compounds are lignin monomers that are metabolic products from secondary treatment of the discharged effluent. This indicated that the existing industrial process could not further degrade the effluent. Supplementation by carbon (glucose 1.0%) and nitrogen (peptone 0.5%) bio-stimulated the degradation process. The degraded sample after biostimulation showed either disappearance or generation of metabolic products under optimized conditions, i.e., a stirring rate of 150 rpm and temperature of 37 ± 1°C after 3 and 6 days of bacterial incubation. Isolated potential autochthonous bacteria were identified as Klebsiella pneumoniae IITRCP04 (KU715839), Enterobacter cloacae strain IITRCP11 (KU715840), Enterobacter cloacae IITRCP14 (KU715841), and Acinetobacter pittii strain IITRCP19 (KU715842). Lactic acid, benzoic acid, and vanillin, resulting from residual chlorolignin compounds, were generated as potential value-added products during the detoxification of effluent in the biostimulation process, supporting the commercial importance of this process.Entities:
Keywords: biostimulation; chromosomal aberration; ligninolytic enzyme; phytotoxicity; pulp paper effluent; refractory pollutants
Year: 2018 PMID: 29867864 PMCID: PMC5962716 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00960
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Physico-chemical characteristics of discharged pulp and paper mill effluent and their heavy metals content collected from M/S century pulp paper Ltd. Lalkuan, Nainital, Uttarakhand, India.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | pH | 8.1 ± 0.20 | 7.0 ± 0.20ns | 5–9 |
| 2 | Color | 2,500 ± 125 | 625 ± 24.35 | Colorless |
| 4 | TS | 616 ± 120 | 136 ± 4.21 | – |
| 5 | TDS | 560 ± 13.25 | 110 ± 2.12 | – |
| 7 | TSS | 56 ± 2.13 | 26 ± 1.02 | 35 |
| 8 | COD | 17, 999 ± 205.00 | 3, 000 ± 64.87 | 120 |
| 9 | BOD | 6, 000 ± 127 | 2, 700 ± 60.00 | 40 |
| 10 | Total Phenols | 413 ± 18.23 | 389 ± 18.14ns | 0.50 |
| 11 | Total nitrogen | 143 ± 6.10 | 103 ± 5.20ns | 143 |
| 12 | sulfate | 1, 692 ± 13.70 | 1, 280 ± 15.67 | 250 |
| 13 | Phosphorus | 180 ± 6.60 | 172.3 ± 6.40ns | 180 |
| 14 | Cl− | 2.04 ± 0.10 | 1.230 ± 0.10 | 1500 |
| 15 | Na+ | 64 ± 19.90 | 25.00 ± 20.50 | 200 |
| 16 | K+ | 7.8 ± 0.20 | 1.380 ± 0.90 | – |
| 17 | Lignin | 46, 000 ± 14.21 | 1, 550 ± 12.06 | 0.05 |
| 18 | Chlorophenol | 203 ± 20.30 | 195 ± 20.00ns | 3.0 |
|
| ||||
| 19 | Fe | 67.53 ± 2.00 | 1.05 ± 0.30 | 2.00 |
| 20 | Zn | 13.90 ± 0.30 | 0.27 ± 0.01 | 2.00 |
| 21 | Cu | 2.15 ± 0.06 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.50 |
| 22 | Cr | 2.30 ± 0.06 | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 0.05 |
| 23 | Cd | 0.255 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.01 |
| 24 | Mn | 11.00 ± 0.30 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.20 |
| 25 | Ni | 3.30 ± 0.02 | 0.19 ± 0.01 | 0.10 |
All the values are mean ± SD in mg/l except color (Co-Pt) and pH. The statistical significance between the values of two samples was evaluated by ANOVA. ns, no significance(p > 0.05);
less significant (p < 0.05).
Figure 1Pattern of biomass and CFU in the pulp and paper mill effluent decolourisation after biostimulation of autochthonus bacteria by 2% glucose and 0.5% peptone (A), Morphological view of bacterial strains observed under SEM at 3 days (B) and 6 days incubation at 10000x magnification (C).
Figure 2Pattern of Ligninolytic enzyme during pulp and paper mill effluent decolourisation after Biostimulation. MnP, Manganese Peroxidase; LiP, Lignin Peroxidase.
Figure 3Pattern of protein during pulp and paper mill effluent decolourisation after biostimulation of autochthonus bacteria by 2% glucose and 0.5% peptone.
Figure 4HPLC analysis of decolorized pulp and paper mill effluent at different time interval on 250 nm (A) and 320 nm absorbent (B).
Identified residual organic pollutants by GC-MS in the TMS derivatized ethyl acetate extracts of pulp and paper mill effluent after secondary treatment in alkaline (pH, 8.5), acidic (pH 2), 3 days and 6 days of bacterial treatment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.97 | 2-Butoxyethanol | − | − | − | + |
| 2 | 7.96 | Thymol- TMS | − | + | − | − |
| 3 | 8.17 | D-Lactic acid- DITMS | − | + | − | − |
| 4 | 8.38 | D-Lactic acid- DITMS | + | − | − | − |
| 5 | 8.75 | 2,3,6-trimethyl phenol | + | − | − | − |
| 6 | 9.08 | benzoic acid trimethylsilyl ester | − | − | + | − |
| 7 | 9.14 | Benzoic acid, Trimethylsilyl ester | − | − | − | + |
| 8 | 10.45 | citral | − | + | − | − |
| 9 | 10.53/11.78 | 2′,6′-Dihydroxyacetophenone, bis(trimethylsilyl) ether | + | + | + | − |
| 10 | 12.85 | Glycerol- tri-TMS ether | + | + | + | + |
| 11 | 13.71/13.8 | phenol-4-ethyl-2-methoxy or 4-Ethylguaiacol | − | − | + | + |
| 12 | 14.66/14.68 | 2-methoxyphenol or guaiacol | − | − | + | + |
| 13 | 15.35 | Phenol,2,6-dimethoxy or syringol | + | + | − | − |
| 14 | 15.64/15.7 | Pthalatic anhydride | + | − | − | − |
| 15 | 17.02 | phenol-2-methoxy-4-(1-propenyl or isoeugenol) | − | + | − | − |
| 16 | 18.51 | 9-decenoic acid, trimethylsilyl ester | + | + | + | − |
| 17 | 19.89/19.92 | Benzyldehyde,4-(acetyloxy)-3-methoxy or acetylvanillin | + | − | − | − |
| 18 | 20.19/20.17 | Octadecanoic acid, trimethylsilyl ester or stearic acid | − | + | − | − |
| 19 | 21.74 | 1,2-benzenedicarboxylic acid,bis(2-ethylhexyl)ester | + | − | − | + |
| 20 | 22.87 | Acetic acid [(trimethylsilyl)oxy]trimethyle ester | − | − | + | − |
| 21 | 24.38/24.50 | Methoxy cinnamic acid | + | − | − | − |
| 22 | 24.40 | 9,12 octadecadienoic acid,(2-phenyl 1,3 dioxolan-4-yl)methyl ester trans | − | + | − | − |
| 23 | 24.87 | n-pentadecanoic acid,trimethylsilyl ester | − | − | + | − |
| 24 | 26.75 | 9,12-octadecadienoic acid,(2-phenyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl]methyl ester cis | + | + | − | − |
| 25 | 27.81 | 2,6-bis[trimethylsilyl]-3,4-dimethylphosphinine | − | − | + | − |
| 26 | 27.99 | Hexadecanoic acid,trimethylsilyl ester (Palmitic acid) | − | − | + | + |
| 27 | 28.97/28.98 | Pentadecane | + | + | − | − |
| 28 | 30.88 | Octadecanoic acid,trimethylsilyl ester | + | + | + | − |
| 29 | 31.13/32.15 | Cinnamic acid-α-phenyl-trimethylsilyl ester | − | − | + | + |
| 30 | 32.43 | Cis,13-docosenoic acid,trimethylsilyl ester | + | − | − | − |
| 31 | 33.26 | 9-[2,6-diethylphenyl]2,8-dimethyl-9-h-purin-6-amine | − | − | + | − |
| 32 | 33.63 | 2-Monopalmitin TMS ether | + | + | − | + |
| 33 | 33.91 | 1- Monopalmitin-DITMS | + | + | − | − |
| 34 | 34.88 | 1,2,diphenyl-s (t-butyl) acephenanthrylene | − | − | + | − |
| 35 | 35.52/35.5 | 1-Monostearin − DITMS/Cyclotetracosane | + | + | − | − |
| 36 | 36.06 | Octacosane | − | − | + | |
| 37 | 36.47 | Squalene/2,6,10,14,18,22-tetracosahexane,2,6,10,15,19,23-heaxamethyl-[all-E] | − | − | + | − |
| 38 | 37.43 | 5,8-dimethoxy-6-methyl-2,4-bis(phenylmethyl)naphthalen-1-ol | − | − | + | + |
| 39 | 39.16 | 1,2-benzendicarboxylic acid disononyl ester | − | − | + | − |
| 40 | 40.68 | Nonacosanol | − | − | + | − |
Figure 5Total Ion Chromatogram (TIC) of TMS derivatized detected residual organic pollutants from ethyl acetate extract of biostimulated effluent after 3 days (A) and 6 days incubation (B).
Figure 6Seed germination test at 50 and 100% concentration of pulp and paper mill untreated (UT) and bacterial degraded sample (T) on Phaseolus mungo (A) and Triticum aestivum (B) and percent inhibition of seed germination (C).
Figure 7Different chromosomal aberration induced by pulp paper mill effluent before (a–h) and after (i–l) bacterial treatment. (a) disturbed pole to pole arrangement of chromosomes at metaphase (b) vagrant chromosome at metaphase (c) diagonal anaphase (d) arrow shows laggard chromosome (e) vagrant chromosome in anaphase-telophase (f) diploid chromosome (g) ring chromosome (h) sticky anaphase (i) normal prophase (j) normal metaphase (k) normal anaphase (l) normal telophase.