| Literature DB >> 28566891 |
Wen-Gang Zhang1, En-Qiang Linghu1, Ning-Li Chai1, Hui-Kai Li1.
Abstract
AIM: To verify the hypothesis that the Ling classification describes the endoscopic progressive process of achalasia and determine the ability of successful peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) to prevent endoscopic progression of achalasia.Entities:
Keywords: Achalasia; Endoscopy; Ling classification; Peroral endoscopic myotomy; Progression
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28566891 PMCID: PMC5434437 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i18.3309
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Gastroenterol ISSN: 1007-9327 Impact factor: 5.742
Figure 1Typical pictures of Ling classification. A: Ling I; B: Ling IIa; C: Ling IIb; D: Ling IIc; E: Ling III.
Demographic characteristics of patients presenting with achalasia n (%)
| Sex, female/male ( | 197/162 |
| Age (yr), mean (range) | 42.1 (12-75) |
| Duration of symptoms (mo), median (range) | 36 (2-360) |
| Lower esophageal sphincter pressure (mmHg), mean (range) | 33.0 (0.7-72.4) |
| Ling classification | |
| I | 119 (33.1) |
| IIa | 106 (29.5) |
| IIb | 60 (16.7) |
| IIc | 60 (16.7) |
| III | 14 (3.9) |
Figure 2Symptom duration increased significantly when the Ling classification increased (from I to III) (P < 0.05).
Figure 3Lower esophageal sphincter pressure decreased when the Ling classification increased (from I to III) (P < 0.05). LESP: Lower esophageal sphincter pressure.
Comparison of symptom duration, lower esophageal sphincter pressure, and dysphagia score among Ling classifications
| 119 | 106 | 60 | 60 | 14 | ||
| Onset age (yr), mean | 35.3 | 38.9 | 36.1 | 36.4 | 32.9 | > 0.05 |
| Age at time of diagnosis (yr), mean | 38.5 | 42.8 | 43.8 | 46.4 | 45.4 | < 0.05 |
| Sex (female/male) | 65/54 | 60/46 | 32/28 | 35/25 | 5/9 | > 0.05 |
| Duration (mo), median | 24 | 36 | 60 | 72 | 120 | < 0.05 |
| LESP (mmHg), mean | 35 | 34.7 | 32.8 | 28.9 | 16.9 | < 0.05 |
LESP: Lower esophageal sphincter pressure.
Demographics and treatment outcomes of the 21 patients with a post-peroral endoscopic myotomy follow-up for > 2 years n (%)
| Sex, female/male ( | 9/12 |
| Age (yr), mean (range) | 43.8 (16-62) |
| Duration of symptoms (mo), median (range) | 36 (6-120) |
| Endoscopic follow-up (mo), mean (range) | 37.8 (24-51) |
| Manometry follow-up rate | 19 (90.5) |
| Lower esophageal sphincter pressure (mmHg), mean (range) | |
| Pre-treatment | 34.6 (15.3-59.4) |
| Post-treatment | 15.0 (2.1-21.6) |
| Ling classification | |
| I | 8 (38.1) |
| IIa | 7 (33.3) |
| IIb | 5 (23.8) |
| IIc | 0 (0) |
| III | 1 (4.8) |
| Treatment success rate (Eckardt score ≤ 3) | 21 (100) |