Literature DB >> 28564502

CAN GENE FLOW PREVENT REINFORCEMENT?

Neil Sanderson1.   

Abstract

A model of reinforcement in a hybrid zone is developed in which an allele causing reinforcement may only be favored in the center of the hybrid zone and is selected against elsewhere. When reinforcement is favored only in the hybrid zone, the swamping effect of gene flow severely impedes the evolution of reinforcement: reinforcement can only occur when β < sγ2 /4 (s is selection against hybrids, γ is the strength of reinforcement, and β is the strength of selection against reinforcement). Although the region in which reinforcement can occur is narrower when selection against hybrids is stronger, strong selection is still more likely to be reinforced despite the effects of gene flow. Another modifier is considered which reduces postmating isolation. The conditions for increase in frequency of this modifier reduce to the same conditions as those for the reinforcing allele. Both kinds of modification reduce the strength of selection and, therefore, cause the cline to widen. Reinforcement causes an increase in premating isolation between races, while modification of selection reduces postmating isolation. © 1989 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Year:  1989        PMID: 28564502     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb02570.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  13 in total

1.  Interspecific pairing between two siblingIps species (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).

Authors:  J W Fox; D L Wood; J H Cane
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Reinforcement can overcome gene flow during speciation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Daniel R Matute
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Conspecific sperm precedence is reinforced, but postcopulatory sexual selection weakened, in sympatric populations of Drosophila.

Authors:  Dean M Castillo; Leonie C Moyle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  On the Coyne and Orr-igin of species: effects of intrinsic postzygotic isolation, ecological differentiation, x chromosome size, and sympatry on Drosophila speciation.

Authors:  Michael Turelli; Jeremy R Lipkowitz; Yaniv Brandvain
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-01-26       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Variation in hybrid gene expression: Implications for the evolution of genetic incompatibilities in interbreeding species.

Authors:  Fabian Seidl; Nicholas A Levis; Corbin D Jones; Anaïs Monroy-Eklund; Ian M Ehrenreich; Karin S Pfennig
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  Correlated evolution of male and female reproductive traits drive a cascading effect of reinforcement in Drosophila yakuba.

Authors:  Aaron A Comeault; Aarti Venkat; Daniel R Matute
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Geographic variation in hybridization across a reinforcement contact zone of chorus frogs (Pseudacris).

Authors:  Emily Moriarty Lemmon; Thomas E Juenger
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Is cascade reinforcement likely when sympatric and allopatric populations exchange migrants?

Authors:  Roman Yukilevich; Fumio Aoki
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.624

9.  Reinforcement's incidental effects on reproductive isolation between conspecifics.

Authors:  Aaron A Comeault; Daniel R Matute
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 2.624

10.  Wolbachia-induced unidirectional cytoplasmic incompatibility and speciation: mainland-island model.

Authors:  Arndt Telschow; Matthias Flor; Yutaka Kobayashi; Peter Hammerstein; John H Werren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.