Literature DB >> 28563851

QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF MORPHOLOGICAL DIFFERENTIATION IN PEROMYSCUS. II. ANALYSIS OF SELECTION AND DRIFT.

David Lofsvold1.   

Abstract

The hypothesis that the morphological divergence of local populations of Peromyscus is due to random genetic drift was evaluated by testing the proportionality of the among-locality covariance matrix, L, and the additive genetic covariance matrix, G. Overall, significant proportionality of L̂ and Ĝ was not observed, indicating the evolutionary divergence of local populations does not result from random genetic drift. The forces of selection needed to differentiate three taxa of Peromyscus were reconstructed to examine the divergence of species and subspecies. The selection gradients obtained illustrate the inadequacy of univariate analyses of selection by finding that some characters evolve in the direction opposite to the force of selection acting directly on them. A retrospective selection index was constructed using the estimated selection gradients, and truncation selection on this index was used to estimate the minimum selective mortality per generation required to produce the observed change. On any of the time scales used, the proportion of the population that would need to be culled was quite low, the greatest being of the same order of magnitude as the selective intensities observed in extant natural populations. Thus, entirely plausible intensities of directional natural selection can produce species-level differences in a period of time too short to be resolved in the fossil record. © 1988 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Year:  1988        PMID: 28563851     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1988.tb04107.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  7 in total

1.  MIPoD: a hypothesis-testing framework for microevolutionary inference from patterns of divergence.

Authors:  Paul A Hohenlohe; Stevan J Arnold
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Evolution of physiological performance capacities and environmental adaptation: insights from high-elevation deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus).

Authors:  Jay F Storz; Zachary A Cheviron; Grant B McClelland; Graham R Scott
Journal:  J Mammal       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 2.416

3.  High evolutionary constraints limited adaptive responses to past climate changes in toad skulls.

Authors:  Monique Nouailhetas Simon; Fabio Andrade Machado; Gabriel Marroig
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Characterizing the evolutionary path(s) to early Homo.

Authors:  Lauren Schroeder; Charles C Roseman; James M Cheverud; Rebecca R Ackermann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Concordance between stabilizing sexual selection, intraspecific variation, and interspecific divergence in Phymata.

Authors:  David Punzalan; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Skull variation in Afro-Eurasian monkeys results from both adaptive and non-adaptive evolutionary processes.

Authors:  Lauren Schroeder; Sarah Elton; Rebecca Rogers Ackermann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Intense natural selection preceded the invasion of new adaptive zones during the radiation of New World leaf-nosed bats.

Authors:  Daniela M Rossoni; Ana Paula A Assis; Norberto P Giannini; Gabriel Marroig
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.