Literature DB >> 27798306

High evolutionary constraints limited adaptive responses to past climate changes in toad skulls.

Monique Nouailhetas Simon1, Fabio Andrade Machado2, Gabriel Marroig2.   

Abstract

Interactions among traits that build a complex structure may be represented as genetic covariation and correlation. Genetic correlations may act as constraints, deflecting the evolutionary response from the direction of natural selection. We investigated the relative importance of drift, selection, and constraints in driving skull divergence in a group of related toad species. The distributional range of these species encompasses very distinct habitats with important climatic differences and the species are primarily distinguished by differences in their skulls. Some parts of the toad skull, such as the snout, may have functional relevance in reproductive ecology, detecting water cues. Thus, we hypothesized that the species skull divergence was driven by natural selection associated with climatic variation. However, given that all species present high correlations among skull traits, our second prediction was of high constraints deflecting the response to selection. We first extracted the main morphological direction that is expected to be subjected to selection by using within- and between-species covariance matrices. We then used evolutionary regressions to investigate whether divergence along this direction is explained by climatic variation between species. We also used quantitative genetics models to test for a role of random drift versus natural selection in skull divergence and to reconstruct selection gradients along species phylogeny. Climatic variables explained high proportions of between-species variation in the most selected axis. However, most evolutionary responses were not in the direction of selection, but aligned with the direction of allometric size, the dimension of highest phenotypic variance in the ancestral population. We conclude that toad species have responded to selection related to climate in their skulls, yet high evolutionary constraints dominated species divergence and may limit species responses to future climate change.
© 2016 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  G-matrix; Rhinella granulosa species group; evolutionary potential; lines of least evolutionary resistance; selection gradients

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27798306      PMCID: PMC5095385          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2016.1783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  48 in total

1.  Patterns of natural selection on size at metamorphosis in water frogs.

Authors:  Res Altwegg; Heinz-Ulrich Reyer
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Evolutionary potential of Chamaecrista fasciculata in relation to climate change. II. Genetic architecture of three populations reciprocally planted along an environmental gradient in the great plains.

Authors:  Julie R Etterson
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Evolutionary constraint and ecological consequences.

Authors:  Douglas J Futuyma
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Can parallel diversification occur in sympatry? Repeated patterns of body-size evolution in coexisting clades of North American salamanders.

Authors:  Kenneth H Kozak; Robert W Mendyk; John J Wiens
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF MORPHOLOGICAL DIFFERENTIATION IN PEROMYSCUS. II. ANALYSIS OF SELECTION AND DRIFT.

Authors:  David Lofsvold
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  STABILIZING SELECTION AND THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ADAPTATION.

Authors:  Thomas F Hansen
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Phenotypic divergence of the common toad (Bufo bufo) along an altitudinal gradient: evidence for local adaptation.

Authors:  E Luquet; J-P Léna; C Miaud; S Plénet
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Diet of Physalaemus cf. cicada (Leptodactylidae) and Bufo granulosus (Bufonidae) in a semideciduous forest.

Authors:  A S Santana; F A Juncá
Journal:  Braz J Biol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.651

9.  Larger body size at metamorphosis enhances survival, growth and performance of young cane toads (Rhinella marina).

Authors:  Elisa Cabrera-Guzmán; Michael R Crossland; Gregory P Brown; Richard Shine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  EvolQG - An R package for evolutionary quantitative genetics.

Authors:  Diogo Melo; Guilherme Garcia; Alex Hubbe; Ana Paula Assis; Gabriel Marroig
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2015-09-30
View more
  6 in total

1.  Correction to 'High evolutionary constraints limited adaptive responses to past climate changes in toad skulls'.

Authors:  Monique Nouailhetas Simon; Fabio Andrade Machado; Gabriel Marroig
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Developmental Bias and Evolution: A Regulatory Network Perspective.

Authors:  Tobias Uller; Armin P Moczek; Richard A Watson; Paul M Brakefield; Kevin N Laland
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Evolution of a complex phenotype with biphasic ontogeny: Contribution of development versus function and climatic variation to skull modularity in toads.

Authors:  Monique Nouailhetas Simon; Gabriel Marroig
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Skull variation in Afro-Eurasian monkeys results from both adaptive and non-adaptive evolutionary processes.

Authors:  Lauren Schroeder; Sarah Elton; Rebecca Rogers Ackermann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Intense natural selection preceded the invasion of new adaptive zones during the radiation of New World leaf-nosed bats.

Authors:  Daniela M Rossoni; Ana Paula A Assis; Norberto P Giannini; Gabriel Marroig
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  High-throughput microCT scanning of small specimens: preparation, packing, parameters and post-processing.

Authors:  Christy A Hipsley; Rocio Aguilar; Jay R Black; Scott A Hocknull
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.