| Literature DB >> 28562667 |
Lisha Zha1, Lichun He2, Weidong Xie2, Jin Cheng1, Tong Li1, Mona O Mohsen3, Fan Lei4, Federico Storni5, Martin Bachmann5, Hongquan Chen1, Yaou Zhang2,6.
Abstract
Pleiotrophin (PTN) is a secreted cytokine that is expressed in various cancer cell lines and human tumor such as colon cancer, lung cancer, gastric cancer and melanoma. It plays significant roles in angiogenesis, metastasis, differentiation and cell growth. The expression of PTN in the adult is limited to the hippocampus in an activity-dependent manner, making it a very attractive target for cancer therapy. RNA interference (RNAi) offers great potential as a new powerful therapeutic strategy based on its highly specific and efficient silencing of a target gene. However, efficient delivery of small interfering RNA (siRNA) in vivo remains a significant hurdle for its successful therapeutic application. In this study, we first identified, on a cell-based experiment, applying a 1:1 mixture of two PTN specific siRNA engenders a higher silencing efficiency on both mRNA and protein level than using any of them discretely at the same dose. As a consequence, slower melanoma cells growth was also observed for using two specific siRNA combinatorially. To establish a robust way for siRNA delivery in vivo and further investigate how silence of PTN affects tumor growth, we tested three different methods to deliver siRNA in vivo: first non-targeted in-vivo delivery of siRNA via jetPEI; second lung targeted delivery of siRNA via microbubble coated jetPEI; third tumor cell targeted delivery of siRNA via transferrin-polyethylenimine (Tf-PEI). As a result, we found that all three in-vivo siRNAs delivery methods led to an evident inhibition of melanoma growth in non-immune deficiency C57BL/6 mice without a measureable change of ALT and AST activities. Both targeted delivery methods showed more significant curative effect than jetPEI. The lung targeted delivery by microbubble coated jetPEI revealed a comparable therapeutic effect with Tf-PEI, indicating its potential application for target delivery of siRNA in vivo.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28562667 PMCID: PMC5451024 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177964
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1PTN expression level and its stimulation effect on the proliferation of B16-F10 melanoma cells.
(A). Western-blot analysis of the expression level of PTN in B16-F10 melanoma cells and HEK293 cells. β-actin was detected as a load control. (B). Effects of recombinant PTN on B16-F10 melanoma cell proliferation. Each point represented the mean ± standard deviation of 3 replicates. PTN stimulated B16-F10 melanoma cells proliferation before the cells reached full confluency at a concentration of 100 ng/ml (P < 0.01 compared with control without adding the extracellular PTN). (C). Cells numbers of B16-F10 melanoma 24 hours after different treatments were counted and compared with the control group. Each bar represented the mean ± standard deviation of 3 replicates. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences between samples (** p<0.01).
Fig 2The silence efficiency of PTN siRNA measured by quantitative RT-PCR and western blotting.
The PTN expression level showed a direct correlation with the proliferation rate of B16-F10 melanoma cells. (A). Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of the knock-down efficiency of siRNA 1, siRNA 2 and the mixture of them at the same dose. GAPDH was used as a control. (B). Western blotting analysis of the knock-down effect of siRNA 1, siRNA 2 and the mixture of them at the same dose. β-actin was used as a control. The intensity of the control sample without transfection of any siRNA was set as 100%. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences between samples (** p<0.01 and ns for no significant difference). (C). Silence of the PTN by siRNA reduced the proliferation rate of B16-F10 melanoma cells in a manner directly related the reduced level of PTN. Each point represents the mean ± standard deviation of 3 replicates.
Fig 3All three different systemic treatments by PTN siRNAc inhibited the tumor growth.
(A). The microscopic image of the 60% glucose microbubble with 25x magnification. (B). The microscopic image of the 60% glucose microbubble filtered through the grade 595 1/2 filter paper with 25x magnification. Scale bar is 50 μm for both images. (C-E). Therapeutic effect of the systemic treatment of PTN siRNAc by using jetPEI, TfPEI and microbubble-jetPEI. (C). Lung of the mice treated with jetPEI-random sequence (Top) and jetPEI-siRNAc (Bottom). (D). Lung of the mice treated with TfPEI-random sequence (Top) and TfPEI-siRNAc (Bottom). (E). Lung of the mice treated with microbubble-jetPEI random sequence (Top) and microbubble-jetPEI siRNAc (Bottom). (F-G). The weighted sum of the metastatic colony numbers was plotted in bar chart as mean± standard deviation of 5 mice in each group. (G). The comparison of the siRNAc treatment group and the NC treatment group with the same delivery method. (F). The comparison between different siRNAc delivery methods. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences between samples (** p<0.01 and * p<0.05) (H-K). Melanoma metastasis in liver and gastrointestinal tract. (H). The mice treated with random sequence showed a tumor metastasis in the gastrointestinal tract and liver. (I-K). The mice treated with siRNAc by systemic using of all three in-vivo transfection agent: (I). jetPEI-siRNAc, (J). TfPEI-siRNAc, (K). microbubble-jetPEI siRNAc revealed no tumor metastasis in the gastrointestinal tract and liver.
Fig 4Monitoring the liver toxicity of mice in different treatment groups.
Mice liver enzyme ALT (A) and AST (B) levels were detected at the end of study. There was no significant difference among the groups. The enzyme levels were in the same range as the group treated with normal saline. Data were shown as the mean ± SD. (C) Western blotting analysis of the PTN expression level in the lungs of mice in different treatment groups.