Literature DB >> 28558604

Hospitals Known for Nursing Excellence Perform Better on Value Based Purchasing Measures.

Karen B Lasater1,2, Hayley D Germack1,2,3, Dylan S Small2,4, Matthew D McHugh1,2.   

Abstract

It is well-established that hospitals recognized for good nursing care - Magnet hospitals - are associated with better patient outcomes. Less is known about how Magnet hospitals compare to non-Magnets on quality measures linked to Medicare reimbursement. The purpose of this study was to determine how Magnet hospitals perform compared to matched non-Magnet hospitals on Hospital Value Based Purchasing (VBP) measures. A cross-sectional analysis of three linked data sources was performed. The sample included 3,021 non-federal acute care hospitals participating in the VBP program (323 Magnets; 2,698 non-Magnets). Propensity score matching was used to match Magnet and non-Magnet hospitals with similar hospital characteristics. After matching, linear and logistic regression models were used to examine the relationship between Magnet status and VBP performance. After matching and adjusting for hospital characteristics, Magnet recognition predicted higher scores on Total Performance (Regression Coefficient [RC] = 1.66, p < 0.05), Clinical Processes (RC = 3.85; p < 0.01), and Patient Experience (RC = 6.33; p < 0.001). The relationships between Magnet recognition and the Outcome and Efficiency domains were not statistically significant. Magnet hospitals known for nursing excellence perform better on Hospital VBP measures. As healthcare systems adapt to evolving incentives that reward value, attention to nurses at the front lines may be central to ensuring high-value care for patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  magnet hospitals; medicare; value-based care

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28558604      PMCID: PMC5887159          DOI: 10.1177/1527154417698144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Policy Polit Nurs Pract        ISSN: 1527-1544


  29 in total

1.  Assessing Medicare's hospital pay-for-performance programs and whether they are achieving their goals.

Authors:  Charles N Kahn; Thomas Ault; Lisa Potetz; Thomas Walke; Jayne Hart Chambers; Samantha Burch
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  The effect of pay-for-performance in hospitals: lessons for quality improvement.

Authors:  Rachel M Werner; Jonathan T Kolstad; Elizabeth A Stuart; Daniel Polsky
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 3.  The association between health care quality and cost: a systematic review.

Authors:  Peter S Hussey; Samuel Wertheimer; Ateev Mehrotra
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Missed nursing care is linked to patient satisfaction: a cross-sectional study of US hospitals.

Authors:  Eileen T Lake; Hayley D Germack; Molly Kreider Viscardi
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 7.035

5.  Hospitals In 'Magnet' Program Show Better Patient Outcomes On Mortality Measures Compared To Non-'Magnet' Hospitals.

Authors:  Christopher R Friese; Rong Xia; Amir Ghaferi; John D Birkmeyer; Mousumi Banerjee
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 1: the content, quality, and accessibility of care.

Authors:  Elliott S Fisher; David E Wennberg; Thérèse A Stukel; Daniel J Gottlieb; F L Lucas; Etoile L Pinder
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Patient falls: Association with hospital Magnet status and nursing unit staffing.

Authors:  Eileen T Lake; Jingjing Shang; Susan Klaus; Nancy E Dunton
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.228

8.  Lower Medicare mortality among a set of hospitals known for good nursing care.

Authors:  L H Aiken; H L Smith; E T Lake
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Hospitals Known for Nursing Excellence Associated with Better Hospital Experience for Patients.

Authors:  Amy Witkoski Stimpfel; Douglas M Sloane; Matthew D McHugh; Linda H Aiken
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Magnet® Hospital Recognition Linked to Lower Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection Rates.

Authors:  Hilary Barnes; Jessica Rearden; Matthew D McHugh
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 2.228

View more
  6 in total

1.  Magnet hospital recognition in hospital systems over time.

Authors:  Karen B Lasater; Michael R Richards; Nikila B Dandapani; Lawton R Burns; Matthew D McHugh
Journal:  Health Care Manage Rev       Date:  2019 Jan/Mar

2.  The Association of Hospital Magnet® Status and Pay-for-Performance Penalties.

Authors:  Andrew M Dierkes; Kathryn Riman; Marguerite Daus; Hayley D Germack; Karen B Lasater
Journal:  Policy Polit Nurs Pract       Date:  2021-10-22

3.  Challenging a Fundamental Proposition of Patient-Centeredness.

Authors:  Stephen Aragon; Mak Khojasteh; Montrale Boykin; Breanne Crumpton; Laura McGuinn; Sabina Gesell
Journal:  J Best Pract Health Prof Divers       Date:  2020

4.  The implementation of a professional practice model to improve the nurse work environment in a Dutch hospital: A quasi-experimental study.

Authors:  Janet Bloemhof; Jeannette Knol; Marjon Van Rijn; Bianca M Buurman
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 3.057

5.  System-Level Improvements in Work Environments Lead to Lower Nurse Burnout and Higher Patient Satisfaction.

Authors:  J Margo Brooks Carthon; Linda Hatfield; Heather Brom; Mary Houton; Erin Kelly-Hellyer; Amelia Schlak; Linda H Aiken
Journal:  J Nurs Care Qual       Date:  2021 Jan-Mar 01       Impact factor: 1.728

6.  The Business Case for Magnet ® Designation : Using Data to Support Strategy.

Authors:  Karen Neil Drenkard
Journal:  J Nurs Adm       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 1.806

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.