Literature DB >> 28557500

Do the effects of working memory training depend on baseline ability level?

Jeffrey L Foster1, Tyler L Harrison2, Kenny L Hicks2, Christopher Draheim2, Thomas S Redick3, Randall W Engle2.   

Abstract

There is a debate about the ability to improve cognitive abilities such as fluid intelligence through training on tasks of working memory capacity. The question addressed in the research presented here is who benefits the most from training: people with low cognitive ability or people with high cognitive ability? Subjects with high and low working memory capacity completed a 23-session study that included 3 assessment sessions, and 20 sessions of training on 1 of 3 training regiments: complex span training, running span training, or an active-control task. Consistent with other research, the authors found that training on 1 executive function did not transfer to ability on a different cognitive ability. High working memory subjects showed the largest gains on the training tasks themselves relative to the low working memory subjects-a finding that suggests high spans benefit more than low spans from training with executive function tasks. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28557500     DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  12 in total

1.  The Hype Cycle of Working Memory Training.

Authors:  Thomas S Redick
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-05-16

2.  The Influence of Individual Differences in Cognitive Ability on Working Memory Training Gains.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Wiemers; Thomas S Redick; Alexandra B Morrison
Journal:  J Cogn Enhanc       Date:  2018-11-16

3.  The role of proactive interference in working memory training and transfer.

Authors:  Thomas S Redick; Elizabeth A Wiemers; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-04-05

4.  Exploring Individual Differences as Predictors of Performance Change During Dual-N-Back Training.

Authors:  Per T Ørskov; Anne Norup; Erin L Beatty; Susanne M Jaeggi
Journal:  J Cogn Enhanc       Date:  2021-06-07

Review 5.  The role of attention control in complex real-world tasks.

Authors:  Christopher Draheim; Richard Pak; Amanda A Draheim; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-02-15

6.  Predictors of Effective Working Memory Training in Individuals with Alcohol Use Disorders.

Authors:  Rachel L Gunn; Kyle R Gerst; Elizabeth A Wiemers; Thomas S Redick; Peter R Finn
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.455

7.  Working memory training involves learning new skills.

Authors:  Susan E Gathercole; Darren L Dunning; Joni Holmes; Dennis Norris
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 3.059

8.  Most evidence for the compensation account of cognitive training is unreliable.

Authors:  Tomasz Smoleń; Jan Jastrzebski; Eduardo Estrada; Adam Chuderski
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-11

9.  Feature coding dataset for trained and untrained working memory tasks in randomized controlled trials of working memory training.

Authors:  Susan E Gathercole; Darren L Dunning; Joni Holmes; Dennis G Norris
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2018-11-14

10.  The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on within- and cross-paradigm transfer following multi-session backward recall training.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Byrne; Michael P Ewbank; Susan E Gathercole; Joni Holmes
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 2.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.