Literature DB >> 28556895

A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model predicting tumour growth inhibition after intermittent administration with the mTOR kinase inhibitor AZD8055.

James W T Yates1, Sarah V Holt1, Armelle Logie1, Kirsty Payne1, Karen Woods1, Robert W Wilkinson1,2, Barry R Davies1, Sylvie M Guichard1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: AZD8055 is a potent orally available mTOR kinase inhibitor with in vitro and in vivo antitumour activity against a range of tumour types. Preclinical studies showed that AZD8055 induced a dose-dependent pharmacodynamic effect in xenograft models in vivo, but a lack of understanding of the relative contributions of the maximum inhibition of the biomarkers and the duration of inhibition to the antitumour effect, limited the rational design of experiments to optimize the dose and schedules of treatment. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: In this study, a mathematical modelling approach was developed to relate pharmacodynamics and antitumour activity using preclinical data generated in mice bearing U87-MG xenografts. KEY
RESULTS: Refinement and validation of the model was carried out in a panel of additional human tumour xenograft models with different growth rates and different sensitivity to AZD8055 (from partial growth inhibition to regression). Finally, the model was applied to accurately predict the efficacy of high, intermittent dosing schedules of AZD8055. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Overall, this new model linking pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamic biomarkers and efficacy across several tumour xenografts with different sensitivity to AZD8055 was able to identify the optimal dose and route of administration to maximize the antitumour efficacy in preclinical models and its potential for translation into man.
© 2017 The British Pharmacological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28556895      PMCID: PMC5522991          DOI: 10.1111/bph.13886

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Pharmacol        ISSN: 0007-1188            Impact factor:   8.739


  28 in total

1.  mTOR kinase inhibition causes feedback-dependent biphasic regulation of AKT signaling.

Authors:  Vanessa S Rodrik-Outmezguine; Sarat Chandarlapaty; Nen C Pagano; Poulikos I Poulikakos; Maurizio Scaltriti; Elizabeth Moskatel; José Baselga; Sylvie Guichard; Neal Rosen
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 39.397

Review 2.  mTOR signaling in growth control and disease.

Authors:  Mathieu Laplante; David M Sabatini
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  The somatic genomic landscape of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Cameron W Brennan; Roel G W Verhaak; Aaron McKenna; Benito Campos; Houtan Noushmehr; Sofie R Salama; Siyuan Zheng; Debyani Chakravarty; J Zachary Sanborn; Samuel H Berman; Rameen Beroukhim; Brady Bernard; Chang-Jiun Wu; Giannicola Genovese; Ilya Shmulevich; Jill Barnholtz-Sloan; Lihua Zou; Rahulsimham Vegesna; Sachet A Shukla; Giovanni Ciriello; W K Yung; Wei Zhang; Carrie Sougnez; Tom Mikkelsen; Kenneth Aldape; Darell D Bigner; Erwin G Van Meir; Michael Prados; Andrew Sloan; Keith L Black; Jennifer Eschbacher; Gaetano Finocchiaro; William Friedman; David W Andrews; Abhijit Guha; Mary Iacocca; Brian P O'Neill; Greg Foltz; Jerome Myers; Daniel J Weisenberger; Robert Penny; Raju Kucherlapati; Charles M Perou; D Neil Hayes; Richard Gibbs; Marco Marra; Gordon B Mills; Eric Lander; Paul Spellman; Richard Wilson; Chris Sander; John Weinstein; Matthew Meyerson; Stacey Gabriel; Peter W Laird; David Haussler; Gad Getz; Lynda Chin
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Experimental design and analysis and their reporting: new guidance for publication in BJP.

Authors:  Michael J Curtis; Richard A Bond; Domenico Spina; Amrita Ahluwalia; Stephen P A Alexander; Mark A Giembycz; Annette Gilchrist; Daniel Hoyer; Paul A Insel; Angelo A Izzo; Andrew J Lawrence; David J MacEwan; Lawrence D F Moon; Sue Wonnacott; Arthur H Weston; John C McGrath
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 8.739

5.  The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2015/16: Enzymes.

Authors:  Stephen Ph Alexander; Doriano Fabbro; Eamonn Kelly; Neil Marrion; John A Peters; Helen E Benson; Elena Faccenda; Adam J Pawson; Joanna L Sharman; Christopher Southan; Jamie A Davies
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 8.739

6.  Comparison of four basic models of indirect pharmacodynamic responses.

Authors:  N L Dayneka; V Garg; W J Jusko
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1993-08

7.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling of hedgehog inhibitor TAK-441 for the inhibition of Gli1 messenger RNA expression and antitumor efficacy in xenografted tumor model mice.

Authors:  Akifumi Kogame; Yoshihiko Tagawa; Sachio Shibata; Hideaki Tojo; Maki Miyamoto; Kimio Tohyama; Takahiro Kondo; Shimoga Prakash; Wen Chyi Shyu; Satoru Asahi
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 3.922

8.  Pulsatile administration of the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor gefitinib is significantly more effective than continuous dosing for sensitizing tumors to paclitaxel.

Authors:  David B Solit; Yuhong She; Jose Lobo; Mark G Kris; Howard I Scher; Neal Rosen; Frank M Sirotnak
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  mTOR inhibition induces upstream receptor tyrosine kinase signaling and activates Akt.

Authors:  Kathryn E O'Reilly; Fredi Rojo; Qing-Bai She; David Solit; Gordon B Mills; Debra Smith; Heidi Lane; Francesco Hofmann; Daniel J Hicklin; Dale L Ludwig; Jose Baselga; Neal Rosen
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Antitumor activity of rapamycin in a Phase I trial for patients with recurrent PTEN-deficient glioblastoma.

Authors:  Tim F Cloughesy; Koji Yoshimoto; Phioanh Nghiemphu; Kevin Brown; Julie Dang; Shaojun Zhu; Teli Hsueh; Yinan Chen; Wei Wang; David Youngkin; Linda Liau; Neil Martin; Don Becker; Marvin Bergsneider; Albert Lai; Richard Green; Tom Oglesby; Michael Koleto; Jeff Trent; Steve Horvath; Paul S Mischel; Ingo K Mellinghoff; Charles L Sawyers
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  4 in total

1.  Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Model of MBQ-167 to Predict Tumor Growth Inhibition in Mice.

Authors:  Javier Reig-López; María Del Mar Maldonado; Matilde Merino-Sanjuan; Ailed M Cruz-Collazo; Jean F Ruiz-Calderón; Victor Mangas-Sanjuán; Suranganie Dharmawardhane; Jorge Duconge
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 6.321

2.  A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model predicting tumour growth inhibition after intermittent administration with the mTOR kinase inhibitor AZD8055.

Authors:  James W T Yates; Sarah V Holt; Armelle Logie; Kirsty Payne; Karen Woods; Robert W Wilkinson; Barry R Davies; Sylvie M Guichard
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 3.  Protein kinase inhibitors for acute leukemia.

Authors:  Yuan Ling; Qing Xie; Zikang Zhang; Hua Zhang
Journal:  Biomark Res       Date:  2018-02-13

4.  Different ODE models of tumor growth can deliver similar results.

Authors:  James A Koziol; Theresa J Falls; Jan E Schnitzer
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 4.638

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.