BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: AZD8055 is a potent orally available mTOR kinase inhibitor with in vitro and in vivo antitumour activity against a range of tumour types. Preclinical studies showed that AZD8055 induced a dose-dependent pharmacodynamic effect in xenograft models in vivo, but a lack of understanding of the relative contributions of the maximum inhibition of the biomarkers and the duration of inhibition to the antitumour effect, limited the rational design of experiments to optimize the dose and schedules of treatment. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: In this study, a mathematical modelling approach was developed to relate pharmacodynamics and antitumour activity using preclinical data generated in mice bearing U87-MG xenografts. KEY RESULTS: Refinement and validation of the model was carried out in a panel of additional human tumour xenograft models with different growth rates and different sensitivity to AZD8055 (from partial growth inhibition to regression). Finally, the model was applied to accurately predict the efficacy of high, intermittent dosing schedules of AZD8055. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Overall, this new model linking pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamic biomarkers and efficacy across several tumour xenografts with different sensitivity to AZD8055 was able to identify the optimal dose and route of administration to maximize the antitumour efficacy in preclinical models and its potential for translation into man.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:AZD8055 is a potent orally available mTOR kinase inhibitor with in vitro and in vivo antitumour activity against a range of tumour types. Preclinical studies showed that AZD8055 induced a dose-dependent pharmacodynamic effect in xenograft models in vivo, but a lack of understanding of the relative contributions of the maximum inhibition of the biomarkers and the duration of inhibition to the antitumour effect, limited the rational design of experiments to optimize the dose and schedules of treatment. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: In this study, a mathematical modelling approach was developed to relate pharmacodynamics and antitumour activity using preclinical data generated in mice bearing U87-MG xenografts. KEY RESULTS: Refinement and validation of the model was carried out in a panel of additional humantumour xenograft models with different growth rates and different sensitivity to AZD8055 (from partial growth inhibition to regression). Finally, the model was applied to accurately predict the efficacy of high, intermittent dosing schedules of AZD8055. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Overall, this new model linking pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamic biomarkers and efficacy across several tumour xenografts with different sensitivity to AZD8055 was able to identify the optimal dose and route of administration to maximize the antitumour efficacy in preclinical models and its potential for translation into man.
Authors: Vanessa S Rodrik-Outmezguine; Sarat Chandarlapaty; Nen C Pagano; Poulikos I Poulikakos; Maurizio Scaltriti; Elizabeth Moskatel; José Baselga; Sylvie Guichard; Neal Rosen Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2011-06-17 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Cameron W Brennan; Roel G W Verhaak; Aaron McKenna; Benito Campos; Houtan Noushmehr; Sofie R Salama; Siyuan Zheng; Debyani Chakravarty; J Zachary Sanborn; Samuel H Berman; Rameen Beroukhim; Brady Bernard; Chang-Jiun Wu; Giannicola Genovese; Ilya Shmulevich; Jill Barnholtz-Sloan; Lihua Zou; Rahulsimham Vegesna; Sachet A Shukla; Giovanni Ciriello; W K Yung; Wei Zhang; Carrie Sougnez; Tom Mikkelsen; Kenneth Aldape; Darell D Bigner; Erwin G Van Meir; Michael Prados; Andrew Sloan; Keith L Black; Jennifer Eschbacher; Gaetano Finocchiaro; William Friedman; David W Andrews; Abhijit Guha; Mary Iacocca; Brian P O'Neill; Greg Foltz; Jerome Myers; Daniel J Weisenberger; Robert Penny; Raju Kucherlapati; Charles M Perou; D Neil Hayes; Richard Gibbs; Marco Marra; Gordon B Mills; Eric Lander; Paul Spellman; Richard Wilson; Chris Sander; John Weinstein; Matthew Meyerson; Stacey Gabriel; Peter W Laird; David Haussler; Gad Getz; Lynda Chin Journal: Cell Date: 2013-10-10 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Michael J Curtis; Richard A Bond; Domenico Spina; Amrita Ahluwalia; Stephen P A Alexander; Mark A Giembycz; Annette Gilchrist; Daniel Hoyer; Paul A Insel; Angelo A Izzo; Andrew J Lawrence; David J MacEwan; Lawrence D F Moon; Sue Wonnacott; Arthur H Weston; John C McGrath Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Stephen Ph Alexander; Doriano Fabbro; Eamonn Kelly; Neil Marrion; John A Peters; Helen E Benson; Elena Faccenda; Adam J Pawson; Joanna L Sharman; Christopher Southan; Jamie A Davies Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: David B Solit; Yuhong She; Jose Lobo; Mark G Kris; Howard I Scher; Neal Rosen; Frank M Sirotnak Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2005-03-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Kathryn E O'Reilly; Fredi Rojo; Qing-Bai She; David Solit; Gordon B Mills; Debra Smith; Heidi Lane; Francesco Hofmann; Daniel J Hicklin; Dale L Ludwig; Jose Baselga; Neal Rosen Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-02-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Tim F Cloughesy; Koji Yoshimoto; Phioanh Nghiemphu; Kevin Brown; Julie Dang; Shaojun Zhu; Teli Hsueh; Yinan Chen; Wei Wang; David Youngkin; Linda Liau; Neil Martin; Don Becker; Marvin Bergsneider; Albert Lai; Richard Green; Tom Oglesby; Michael Koleto; Jeff Trent; Steve Horvath; Paul S Mischel; Ingo K Mellinghoff; Charles L Sawyers Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2008-01-22 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Javier Reig-López; María Del Mar Maldonado; Matilde Merino-Sanjuan; Ailed M Cruz-Collazo; Jean F Ruiz-Calderón; Victor Mangas-Sanjuán; Suranganie Dharmawardhane; Jorge Duconge Journal: Pharmaceutics Date: 2020-10-15 Impact factor: 6.321
Authors: James W T Yates; Sarah V Holt; Armelle Logie; Kirsty Payne; Karen Woods; Robert W Wilkinson; Barry R Davies; Sylvie M Guichard Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2017-07-06 Impact factor: 8.739