| Literature DB >> 28556789 |
Ahmed Mediani1, Faridah Abas2,3, M Maulidiani4, Alfi Khatib5,6, Chin Ping Tan7, Intan Safinar Ismail8,9, Khozirah Shaari10,11, Amin Ismail12.
Abstract
Phyllanthus niruri is an important medicinal plant. To standardize the extract and guarantee its maximum benefit, processing methods optimization ought to be amenable and beneficial. Herein, three dried P. niruri samples, air (AD), freeze (FD) and oven (OD), extracted with various ethanol to water ratios (0%, 50%, 70%, 80% and 100%) were evaluated for their metabolite changes using proton nuclear magnetic resonance (¹H-NMR)-based metabolomics approach. The amino acids analysis showed that FD P. niruri exhibited higher content of most amino acids compared to the other dried samples. Based on principal component analysis (PCA), the FD P. niruri extracted with 80% ethanol contained higher amounts of hypophyllanthin and phenolic compounds based on the loading plot. The partial least-square (PLS) results showed that the phytochemicals, including hypophyllanthin, catechin, epicatechin, rutin, quercetin and chlorogenic, caffeic, malic and gallic acids were correlated with antioxidant and α-glucosidase inhibitory activities, which were higher in the FD material extracted with 80% ethanol. This report optimized the effect of drying and ethanol ratios and these findings demonstrate that NMR-based metabolomics was an applicable approach. The FD P. niruri extracted with 80% ethanol can be used as afunctional food ingredient for nutraceutical or in medicinal preparation.Entities:
Keywords: NMR spectroscopy; Phyllanthus niruri; amino acids; metabolomics; α-glucosidase inhibitory activity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28556789 PMCID: PMC6152626 DOI: 10.3390/molecules22060902
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Amino acid content of the three dried Phyllanthus niruri extracts.
| Amino Acids | Freeze Drying (FD) | Oven Drying (OD) | Air Drying (AD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aspartic acid | 3.18 a ± 0.13 | 1.85 b ± 0.19 | 2.10 c ± 0.11 |
| Glutamic acid | 9.33 a ± 0.18 | 4.32 b ± 0.03 | 4.59 b ± 0.32 |
| Serine | 2.33 a ± 0.14 | 0.98 b ± 0.09 | 0.95 b ± 0.14 |
| Glycine | 2.10 a ± 0.16 | 0.91 b ± 0.06 | 0.97 b ± 0.09 |
| Histidine | 1.24 a ± 0.10 | 0.56 b ± 0.18 | 0.42 c ± 0.02 |
| Arginine | 2.48 a ± 0.03 | 1.48 b ± 0.33 | 0.69 c ± 0.08 |
| Threonine | 1.55 a ± 0.03 | 0.61 b ± 0.24 | 0.71 b ± 0.02 |
| Alanine | 2.48 a ± 0.11 | 1.50 b ± 0.19 | 1.46 b ± 0.30 |
| Proline | 2.05 a ± 0.06 | 1.20 b ± 0.04 | 2.88 c ± 0.05 |
| Tyrosine | 1.00 a ± 0.10 | 0.24 b ± 0.03 | 0.34 b ± 0.05 |
| Valine | 2.60 a ± 0.10 | 1.15 b ± 0.03 | 1.08 b ± 0.09 |
| Methionine | 0.34 a ± 0.06 | 0.19 b ± 0.04 | 0.11 b ± 0.01 |
| Cystine | 9.50 a ± 0.54 | 4.17 b ± 0.22 | 4.79 b ± 0.52 |
| Isoleucine | 2.08 a ± 0.04 | 0.87 b ± 0.02 | 0.82 b ± 0.08 |
| Leucine | 3.49 a ± 0.08 | 1.43 b ± 0.02 | 1.34 b ± 0.08 |
| Phenylalanine | 4.01 a ± 0.42 | 2.89 b ± 0.06 | 2.84 b ± 0.16 |
| Lysine | 14.10 a ± 0.32 | 5.76 b ± 0.06 | 6.42 b ± 0.58 |
Represented values are the means ± standard deviations; Different superscript letters for the same amino acid comparing the three drying methods showed significant (p < 0.05) difference.
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) characteristic signals of identified metabolites in Phyllanthus niruri extracts.
| Metabolites | 1H-NMR Characteristic Signals |
|---|---|
|
| |
| β glucose | δ 4.59 (d, |
| α glucose | δ 5.19 (d, |
| Sucrose | δ 5.41 (d, |
| Fructose | δ 4.18 (d, |
| Fatty acid | δ 1.33–1.25 (m) |
| Formic acid | δ 8.47 (s) |
| Acetic acid | δ 1.93 (s) |
| Choline | δ 3.21 (s) |
| Alanine | δ 1.49 (d, |
| δ 1.07 (d, | |
| Leucine or isoleucine | δ 0.98 (d, |
|
| |
| Quercetin 3- | δ 6.45 (d, |
| Catechin | δ 6.45 (d, |
| Quercetin 3- | δ 6.45 (d, |
| Epicatechin | δ 6.45 (d, |
| Rutin | δ 6.51 (d, |
| Chlorogenic acid | δ 7.20 (s), signal for caffeoyl δ 7.62 (d, |
| Gallic acid | δ 7.07 (s), 7.15 (s) |
| Ellagic acid | δ 7.46 (s), 7.69 (s) |
| Malic acid | δ 2.72 (d, |
| Quinic acid | δ 4.09 (m), δ 2.63 (dd, |
| Caffeic acid | δ 7.13 (d, |
| Phyllanthin | δ 2.05 (m), δ 2.70 (d, |
| Hypophyllanthin | δ 1.93 (m), δ 2.79 (d, |
Run with deuterated methanol-d4 (CH3OH-d4) and deuterium oxide (D2O) buffer.
Figure 1The principal component analysis (PCA) score (A) and loading (B) plots (PC1 vs. PC2) of the discrimination of P. niruri extracts with various ethanol ratios (0%, 50%, 70%, 80%, 100%); The numbers refer to the ethanol/water ratio; 100:100%, 80:80%, 70:70%, and 50:50%.
Figure 2The PCA score plot (PC1 vs. PC2, (A)) and PC1 and PC2 loading column plots (B) of the discrimination among freeze drying (FD), oven drying (OD) and air drying (AD) of P. niruri extracts.
Figure 3Relative quantification of identified metabolites of different dried P. Niruri based on the mean peak area of the 1H-NMR signals. The characteristic binned signals of epicatechin at δ 7.00 (s), quercetin at δ 7.36 (d), chlorogenic acid at δ 7.20 (s), catechin at δ 2.56 (dd), rutin at δ 6.52 (d), gallic acid at δ 7.08 (s), ellagic acid at δ 7.48 (s), formic acid at δ 8.48 (s), acetic acid at δ 1.92 (s), choline at δ 3.24 (s), α-glucose at δ 5.20 (d), β-glucose at δ 4.60 (d), sucrose at δ 5.40 (d), fructose at δ 4.18 (d), valine at δ 1.52 (d), alanine at δ 1.48 (d), leucine at δ 0.96 (d), phyllanthin at δ 6.84 (d), hypophyllanthin at δ 5.62 (d), malic acid atδ 2.72 (d) and caffeic acid at δ 7.12 (d). a,b,c Different letter above every columns indicates that the results showed statistically significant (p < 0.05; n = 6) differences.
Figure 4The biplot obtained from partial least square (PLS) describing the correlation among the phytochemical constituents of different ethanol extracts (A) of various dried (B) P. niruri total phenolic content (TPC), ferric ion reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical scavenging (DPPH), and α-glucosidase inhibitory activities. The numbers refer to the ethanol/water ratio; 100:100%, 80:80%, 70:70%, and 50:50%. AD—Air drying; OD—Oven drying; FD—Freeze drying.