| Literature DB >> 22448153 |
Heather Kirk, Dandan Cheng, Young Hae Choi, Klaas Vrieling, Peter G L Klinkhamer.
Abstract
Hybridization between plant species can have a number of biological consequences; interspecific hybridization has been tied to speciation events, biological invasions, and diversification at the level of genes, metabolites, and phenotypes. This study aims to provide evidence of transgressive segregation in the expression of primary and secondary metabolites in hybrids between Jacobaeavulgaris and J. aquaticus using an NMR-based metabolomic profiling approach. A number of F(2) hybrid genotypes exhibited metabolomic profiles that were outside the range encompassed by parental species. Expression of a number of primary and secondary metabolites, including jacaronone analogues, chlorogenic acid, sucrose, glucose, malic acid, and two amino acids was extreme in some F(2) hybrid genotypes compared to parental genotypes, and citric acid was expressed in highest concentrations in J. vulgaris. Metabolomic profiling based on NMR is a useful tool for quantifying genetically controlled differences between major primary and secondary metabolites among plant genotypes. Interspecific plant hybrids in general, and specifically hybrids between J. vulgaris and J. aquatica, will be useful for disentangling the ecological role of suites of primary and secondary metabolites in plants, because interspecific hybridization generates extreme metabolomic diversity compared to that normally observed between parental genotypes.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22448153 PMCID: PMC3291818 DOI: 10.1007/s11306-011-0301-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Metabolomics ISSN: 1573-3882 Impact factor: 4.290
Characteristics of 1H chemical shifts of metabolites in Jacobaea aquatica, J. vulgaris and their interspecific hybrids detected by one- and two-dimensional NMR spectra
| Metabolites (chemical identification numbersa) | 1H-Chemical shifts (ppm) and coupling constants (Hz) |
|---|---|
| Alanine (5950) | δ 1.48b (H-3, d, J = 7.2 Hz) |
| Aspartic acid (5960) | δ 2.80 (H-β, dd, J = 8.0 Hz, 3.2 Hz), δ 2.65 (H-β, dd, J = 8.0 Hz, 6.0 Hz) |
| Chlorogenic acid (1794427) | δ 5.33 (H-5, ddd, J = 10.8 Hz, 9.8 Hz, 5.6 Hz), δ 7.15 (H-2′, d, J = 2.1 Hz), δ 6.89 (H-5′, d, J = 8.4 Hz), δ 7.05 (H-6′, dd, J = 8.4 Hz, 2.1 Hz), δ 7.61b (H-7′, d, J = 16.0 Hz), δ 6.36 (H-8′, d, J = 16.0 Hz) |
| Citric acid (311) | δ 2.74 (H-β, d, J = 17.6 Hz), δ 2.56b (H-β′, d, J = 17.6 Hz) |
| Fructose (3426) | δ 4.09 (H-1, d, J = 3.5 Hz) |
| Glucose (5793) | δ 5.20b (H-1α, d, J = 3.8 Hz), δ 4.60 (H-1β, d, J = 7.9 Hz) |
| Glutamic acid (611) | δ 2.42 (H-3, m), δ 2.10 (H-4, m) |
| Glutamine (5961) | δ 2.39 (H-3, m), δ 2.10 (H-4, m) |
| Inositol (892) | δ 4.00 (H-2, t, J = 2.8 Hz), δ 3.44 (H-1 and H-3, dd, J = 9.9 Hz, 2.9 Hz) |
| δ 3.24 (H-5, t, J = 9.3 Hz) | |
| Jacaranone (73307) analogues | δ 6.25 (H-2 and H-6, m), δ 7.15b (H-3 and H-5, m) |
| Malic acid (525) | δ 4.29b (H-α, dd, J = 10.0 Hz, 4.0 Hz), |
| δ 2.72 (H-β, dd, J = 16.6 Hz, 4.0 Hz), | |
| δ 2.55 (H-β, dd, J = 16.6 Hz, 10.0 Hz) | |
| Mannitol (6251) | δ 3.86 (H-1, d, J = 3.0 Hz) |
| Stachyose (439531) | δ 5.45 (H-1′, d, J = 3.8 Hz) |
| Succinic acid | δ 2.54 (s) |
| Sucrose (5988) | δ 5.40b (H-1, d, J = 3.8 Hz), δ 4.17 (H-1′, d, J = 8.5 Hz) |
| Threonine (6288) | δ 1.32b (H-5, d, J = 6.6 Hz) |
Only compounds responsible for a large proportion of differentiation between genotypes are described here. Other metabolites found in this study system are reported in Kirk et al. (2005b) and Leiss et al. (2009a). No previously unreported compounds were found in this study
aCID listed in PubChem Compound of the NCBI database
bIndicates that a particular signal was used for relative quantification of the individual compound
Fig. 1Quantitative variation in the 1H NMR spectra from an interspecific hybrid Jacobaea family. Spectra are derived from ethanol–water extracts of individual samples of one F1 hybrid genotype (F1), three F2 hybrid genotypes (genotypes 70146, 60202, 60179), one Jacobaea aquatica genotype (A), and one J. vulgaris (J) genotype. TMSP: internal standard. F2 genotypes shown are extreme compared to A and J with regard to one or more PC axis (illustrated in Fig. 2)
Fig. 2PCA analysis of 1H NMR spectra of extract from the shoots of one Jacobaea vulgaris genotype (n = 3; large blue dots), one J. aquaticus genotype (n = 4; large red dots), two interspecific F1 hybrid genotypes (n = 4 for each genotype; large black dots), and 102 F2 hybrid genotypes (n = 2 for each genotype; small grey dots). Score plots of PC1 against PC2 (a), and PC3 against PC4 (b) are shown. The large central ellipse represents Hotelling T2 with 95% confidence in score plots. The 1H NMR spectra of the three extreme (relative to parents) F2 genotypes indicated in this figure are shown in Fig. 1 (Color figure online)
Fig. 3Scatter plots of loadings of PC1 plotted against PC2 (a), and of PC3 plotted against PC4 (b). Dots on the scatter plot represent the magnitude of the correlation between each PC and the signal in individual bins (n = 243) relative to the internal standard TMSP. Each compound is generally represented by multiple signals, and signals from the same compound tend to co-vary within the PCA space. Signals were assigned to their associated metabolites, and these are circled and labeled in the scatter plot
Fig. 4Histograms representing the distributions of genotypes according to relative concentration of chlorogenic acid (a), jacaronone analogues (b), citric acid (c), malic acid (d), sucrose (e), glucose (f), alanine (g), and threonine (h). Arrows above figures indicate relative concentrations of given compounds in F1 hybrids (f), Jacobaea aquaticus (a), and J. vulgaris (J)