Literature DB >> 28556691

T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced brain magnetic resonance imaging: A preliminary study with low infusion rate in pediatric patients.

Bruno-Bernard Rochetams1, Bénédicte Marechal2,3, Jean-Philippe Cottier4,5, Kathleen Gaillot4,5, Catherine Sembely-Taveau1, Dominique Sirinelli1,5, Baptiste Morel1,5.   

Abstract

Background The aim of this preliminary study is to evaluate the results of T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in pediatric patients at 1.5T, with a low peripheral intravenous gadoteric acid injection rate of 1 ml/s. Materials and methods Children with neurological symptoms were examined prospectively with conventional MRI and T1-weighted DCE MRI. An magnetic resonance perfusion analysis method was used to obtain time-concentration curves (persistent pattern, type-I; plateau pattern, type-II; washout pattern, type-III) and to calculate pharmacokinetic parameters. A total of two radiologists manually defined regions of interest (ROIs) in the part of the lesion exhibiting the greatest contrast enhancement and in the surrounding normal or contralateral tissue. Lesion/surrounding tissue or contralateral tissue pharmacokinetic parameter ratios were calculated. Tumors were categorized by grade (I-IV) using the World Health Organization (WHO) Grade. Mann-Whitney testing and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed. Results A total of nine boys and nine girls (mean age 10.5 years) were included. Lesions consisted of 10 brain tumors, 3 inflammatory lesions, 3 arteriovenous malformations and 2 strokes. We obtained analyzable concentration-time curves for all patients (6 type-I, 9 type-II, 3 type-III). Ktrans between tumor tissue and surrounding or contralateral tissue was significantly different ( p = 0.034). Ktrans ratios were significantly different between grade I tumors and grade IV tumors ( p = 0.027) and a Ktrans ratio value superior to 0.63 appeared to be discriminant to determine a grade IV of malignancy. Conclusions Our results confirm the feasibility of pediatric T1-weighted DCE MRI at 1.5T with a low injection rate, which could be of great value in differentiating brain tumor grades.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI; brain; children; pediatric radiology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28556691      PMCID: PMC5602334          DOI: 10.1177/1971400917709626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiol J        ISSN: 1971-4009


  23 in total

1.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?

Authors:  C K Kuhl; P Mielcareck; S Klaschik; C Leutner; E Wardelmann; J Gieseke; H H Schild
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging.

Authors:  P S Tofts
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Assessment of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the differentiation of malignant from benign orbital masses.

Authors:  Ying Yuan; Xin-Ping Kuai; Xiao-Song Chen; Xiao-Feng Tao
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 4.  Adult Brain Tumors: Clinical Applications of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Lara A Brandão; Mauricio Castillo
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.266

5.  Usefulness of quantitative peritumoural perfusion and proton spectroscopic magnetic resonance imaging evaluation in differentiating brain gliomas from solitary brain metastases.

Authors:  Gianvincenzo Sparacia; Judith A Gadde; Alberto Iaia; Benedetta Sparacia; Massimo Midiri
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2016-03-17

6.  Arterial spin-labeled perfusion of pediatric brain tumors.

Authors:  K W Yeom; L A Mitchell; R M Lober; P D Barnes; H Vogel; P G Fisher; M S Edwards
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 7.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols.

Authors:  P S Tofts; G Brix; D L Buckley; J L Evelhoch; E Henderson; M V Knopp; H B Larsson; T Y Lee; N A Mayr; G J Parker; R E Port; J Taylor; R M Weisskoff
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Feasibility and applicability of diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in routine assessments of children with high-grade gliomas.

Authors:  Fernando Carceller; Neil P Jerome; Keiko Miyazaki; David J Collins; Matthew R Orton; James A d'Arcy; Toni Wallace; Lucas Moreno; Andrew D J Pearson; Stergios Zacharoulis; Martin O Leach; Lynley V Marshall; Dow-Mu Koh
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 3.167

9.  Demonstration of the reproducibility of free-breathing diffusion-weighted MRI and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in children with solid tumours: a pilot study.

Authors:  Keiko Miyazaki; Neil P Jerome; David J Collins; Matthew R Orton; James A d'Arcy; Toni Wallace; Lucas Moreno; Andrew D J Pearson; Lynley V Marshall; Fernando Carceller; Martin O Leach; Stergios Zacharoulis; Dow-Mu Koh
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  Assessment of blood-brain barrier disruption using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. A systematic review.

Authors:  Anna K Heye; Ross D Culling; Maria Del C Valdés Hernández; Michael J Thrippleton; Joanna M Wardlaw
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 4.881

View more
  1 in total

1.  Injection rate of contrast medium affects diagnostic ability of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for endometrial carcinoma: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Donghui Xu; Aiping Jin; Yongqian Ge; Yanmei Zhang
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.