Literature DB >> 23561057

Assessment of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the differentiation of malignant from benign orbital masses.

Ying Yuan1, Xin-Ping Kuai, Xiao-Song Chen, Xiao-Feng Tao.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging (DCE-MRI) allows imaging of the physiology of the microcirculation. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic efficacy of time intensity curve (TIC) and DCE parameters for characterization of orbital masses.
METHODS: Fifty-nine patients with untreated orbital lesions underwent DCE-MRI before surgery. For each lesion, peak height (PH), maximum enhancement ratio (ERmax), time of peak enhancement (Tpeak) and maximum rise slope (Slopemax) were plotted and calculated. Receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analysis was conducted to assess the appropriate cut-off value.
RESULTS: All 26 lesions that demonstrated persistent pattern (type-I) TICs were benign. Most of the masses with the washout pattern (type-III) TIC were malignant (10/14), including lymphoma (n=6) and melanoma (n=4). The Slopemax of benign lesions was statistically lower than malignant ones, while the ERmax and Tpeak values of benign lesions were significantly higher. No statistical difference was found in PH (P=0.121). The AUC for ERmax, Tpeak and Slopemax in differentiating benign orbital lesions from malignant ones were 0.683, 0.837 and 0.738, respectively. In the three DCE parameters, Slopemax cut-off value of 1.10 provided the highest sensitivity of 93.8%; however, the corresponding specificity was low (58.1%). The ERmax cut-off value of 1.37 and Tpeak cut-off value of 35.14 respectively offered the best diagnostic performances.
CONCLUSION: DCE-MRI, especially the qualitative TIC pattern and quantitative value of Slopemax, ERmax and Tpeak, could be a complementary investigation in distinguishing malignant orbital tumor from benign ones.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE); MRI; Orbital; Time intensity curve (TIC)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23561057     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  19 in total

1.  Differential diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in non-cystic lesions in floor of the mouth.

Authors:  Ying Yuan; Mengda Jiang; Lizhong Wu; Xiaofeng Tao
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  The Use of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MRI in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules.

Authors:  Muhammed Sedat Sakat; Recep Sade; Korhan Kilic; Mustafa Sıtkı Gözeler; Osman Pala; Gökhan Polat; Mecit Kantarcı
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-10-15

Review 3.  Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging in Head and Neck Cancer: Techniques and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  S Gaddikeri; R S Gaddikeri; T Tailor; Y Anzai
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Parotid gland lesions: separate and combined diagnostic value of conventional MRI, diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Ying Yuan; Weiqing Tang; Xiaofeng Tao
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Quantitative multiparametric MRI in uveal melanoma: increased tumor permeability may predict monosomy 3.

Authors:  Mitchell Kamrava; Ali R Sepahdari; Kevin Leu; Pin-Chieh Wang; Kristofer Roberts; D Jeffrey Demanes; Tara McCannel; Benjamin M Ellingson
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Orbital malignant lesions in adults: multiparametric MR imaging.

Authors:  Bo Sun; Liyuan Song
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 2.374

7.  T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced brain magnetic resonance imaging: A preliminary study with low infusion rate in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Bruno-Bernard Rochetams; Bénédicte Marechal; Jean-Philippe Cottier; Kathleen Gaillot; Catherine Sembely-Taveau; Dominique Sirinelli; Baptiste Morel
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2017-05-30

8.  Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) 3 T MRI for orbital lesion characterization.

Authors:  Augustin Lecler; Loïc Duron; Mathieu Zmuda; Kevin Zuber; Olivier Bergès; Marc Putterman; Julien Savatovsky; Laure Fournier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Comparison of Glioblastomas and Brain Metastases using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MRI.

Authors:  Brian C Jung; Julio Arevalo-Perez; John K Lyo; Andrei I Holodny; Sasan Karimi; Robert J Young; Kyung K Peck
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 2.486

10.  Golden-Angle Radial Sparse Parallel (GRASP) MRI differentiates head & neck paragangliomas from schwannomas.

Authors:  T Demerath; K Blackham; C Anastasopoulos; K T Block; B Stieltjes; T Schubert
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 2.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.