Literature DB >> 28551885

Public engagement on urban air pollution: an exploratory study of two interventions.

Christian Oltra1, Roser Sala2, Àlex Boso3, Sergi López Asensio2.   

Abstract

The use of portable sensors to measure air quality is a promising approach for the management of urban air quality given its potential to improve public participation in environmental issues and to promote healthy behaviors. However, not all the projects that use air quality mobile sensors consider the potential effects of their use on the attitudes and behaviors of non-expert individuals. This study explores the experiences, perceptions, attitudes, and behavioral intentions of 12 participants who used a real-time NO2 sensor over a period of 7 days in the metropolitan area of Barcelona and compares them with 16 participants who did not have access to the device but rather to documentary information. The study design is based on recombined focus groups who met at the beginning and end of a 7-day activity. The results suggest that the experience with the sensors, in comparison with the traditional information, generates greater motivation among participants. Also, that the use of the sensor seems to support a more specific awareness of the problem of air pollution. In relation to risk perception, the textual and visual information seems to generate stronger beliefs of severity among participants. In both groups, beliefs of low controllability and self-efficacy are observed. Neither using the sensor nor reading the documentary information seems to contribute positively in this sense. The results of the study aim to contribute to the design of public involvement strategies in urban air pollution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Air pollution; Attitudes; Focus groups; Portable sensors; Public engagement

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28551885     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-017-6011-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  12 in total

1.  Communicating air quality information: experimental evaluation of alternative formats.

Authors:  Branden B Johnson
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.000

Review 2.  A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities.

Authors:  Cathy C Conrad; Krista G Hilchey
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Modifications of health behaviour in response to air pollution notifications in Copenhagen.

Authors:  T Skov; T Cordtz; L K Jensen; P Saugman; K Schmidt; P Theilade
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Public perception and behavior change in relationship to hot weather and air pollution.

Authors:  Jan C Semenza; Daniel J Wilson; Jeremy Parra; Brian D Bontempo; Melissa Hart; David J Sailor; Linda A George
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 6.498

5.  Experience with urban air pollution in Paterson, New Jersey and implications for air pollution communication.

Authors:  Branden B Johnson
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 4.000

6.  Do smog advisories work? Results of an evaluation of the Canadian Smog Advisory Program.

Authors:  D M Stieb; J Paola; K Neuman
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  1996 May-Jun

7.  Knowledge gain and behavioral change in citizen-science programs.

Authors:  Rebecca C Jordan; Steven A Gray; David V Howe; Wesley R Brooks; Joan G Ehrenfeld
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 6.560

8.  Use of real-time sensors to characterise human exposures to combustion related pollutants.

Authors:  Juana Maria Delgado-Saborit
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2012-04-19

9.  Community-based participatory research as a tool to advance environmental health sciences.

Authors:  Liam R O'Fallon; Allen Dearry
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Activity change in response to bad air quality, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2007-2010.

Authors:  Ellen M Wells; Dorr G Dearborn; Leila W Jackson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

1.  Out of sight, out of mind: participatory sensing for monitoring indoor air quality.

Authors:  Àlex Boso; Boris Álvarez; Christian Oltra; Jaime Garrido; Carlos Muñoz; Álvaro Hofflinger
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 2.  Public engagement with air quality data: using health behaviour change theory to support exposure-minimising behaviours.

Authors:  Amy McCarron; Sean Semple; Christine F Braban; Vivien Swanson; Colin Gillespie; Heather D Price
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 6.371

3.  Perception of worry of harm from air pollution: results from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS).

Authors:  Samantha Ammons; Hayley Aja; Armen A Ghazarian; Gabriel Y Lai; Gary L Ellison
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 4.135

4.  Interpreting Mobile and Handheld Air Sensor Readings in Relation to Air Quality Standards and Health Effect Reference Values: Tackling the Challenges.

Authors:  George M Woodall; Mark D Hoover; Ronald Williams; Kristen Benedict; Martin Harper; Jhy-Charm Soo; Annie M Jarabek; Michael J Stewart; James S Brown; Janis E Hulla; Motria Caudill; Andrea L Clements; Amanda Kaufman; Alison J Parker; Martha Keating; David Balshaw; Kevin Garrahan; Laureen Burton; Sheila Batka; Vijay S Limaye; Pertti J Hakkinen; Bob Thompson
Journal:  Atmosphere (Basel)       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  Can portable air quality monitors protect children from air pollution on the school run? An exploratory study.

Authors:  James Heydon; Rohit Chakraborty
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Community-Engaged Air Monitoring to Build Resilience Near the US-Mexico Border.

Authors:  Michelle Wong; Alexa Wilkie; Catalina Garzón-Galvis; Galatea King; Luis Olmedo; Esther Bejarano; Humberto Lugo; Dan Meltzer; Daniel Madrigal; Mariana Claustro; Paul English
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-02-09       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 7.  Can Air Quality Citizen-Sensors Turn into Clean Air Ambassadors? Insights from a Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Guilhem Dardier; Françoise Jabot; Flora Pouliquen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Personal strategies to minimise effects of air pollution on respiratory health: advice for providers, patients and the public.

Authors:  Christopher Carlsten; Sundeep Salvi; Gary W K Wong; Kian Fan Chung
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 16.671

9.  Evaluate Air Pollution by Promethee Ranking in Yangtze River Delta of China.

Authors:  Xiaobing Yu; Chenliang Li; Hong Chen; Zhonghui Ji
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.