Literature DB >> 8771917

Do smog advisories work? Results of an evaluation of the Canadian Smog Advisory Program.

D M Stieb1, J Paola, K Neuman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of the Canadian Smog Advisory Program.
METHODS: Telephone interviews covering perceptions, knowledge, recall of and response to advisories, and general views on their usefulness and effectiveness were conducted with 1,474 randomly selected individuals in four geographic areas. Multiple logistic regression was used to model advisory recall as a function of explanatory variables.
RESULTS: Recall of advisories was higher (72%; 95% CI 68-77%) when measured immediately following an advisory in southern New Brunswick. Recall was lower when measured at the end of the smog "season", and varied significantly between Toronto (46%; 42-51%), Haldimand-Norfolk (18%; 14-24%) and Vancouver (61%; 56-65%). Education and geographic area (urban versus rural) were the strongest explanatory variables in two final multiple logistic regression models. A minority of those who recalled an advisory reported taking action.
CONCLUSIONS: Smog advisories were partially successful in generating awareness, but only marginally effective in promoting action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8771917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Public Health        ISSN: 0008-4263


  9 in total

1.  An urban survey of paediatric environmental health concerns: Perceptions of parents, guardians and health care professionals.

Authors:  Irena Buka; W Todd Rogers; Alvaro R Osornio-Vargas; Harold Hoffman; Marni Pearce; Yuen Yee Li
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.253

2.  Ambient air conditions and variation in urban trail use.

Authors:  Ann M Holmes; Greg Lindsey; Chenchen Qiu
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 3.671

3.  Public engagement on urban air pollution: an exploratory study of two interventions.

Authors:  Christian Oltra; Roser Sala; Àlex Boso; Sergi López Asensio
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Identifying and managing adverse environmental health effects: 2. Outdoor air pollution.

Authors:  Alan Abelsohn; David Stieb; Margaret D Sanborn; Erica Weir
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of the relationship between air pollution and children's respiratory health in Shanghai, China.

Authors:  Rui Wang; Yingying Yang; Renjie Chen; Haidong Kan; Jinyi Wu; Keran Wang; Jay E Maddock; Yuanan Lu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Knowledge and perceptions of air pollution in Ningbo, China.

Authors:  Xujun Qian; Guozhang Xu; Li Li; Yueping Shen; Tianfeng He; Yajun Liang; Zuyao Yang; Wan Wei Zhou; Jiaying Xu
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 7.  Psychosocial and demographic predictors of adherence and non-adherence to health advice accompanying air quality warning systems: a systematic review.

Authors:  Donatella D'Antoni; Louise Smith; Vivian Auyeung; John Weinman
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 5.984

8.  Use of a remote car starter in relation to smog and climate change perceptions: a population survey in Québec (Canada).

Authors:  Diane Bélanger; Pierre Gosselin; Pierre Valois; Stéphane Germain; Belkacem Abdous
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2009-02-16       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Effects of age, season, gender and urban-rural status on time-activity: CanadianHuman Activity Pattern Survey 2 (CHAPS 2).

Authors:  Carlyn J Matz; David M Stieb; Karelyn Davis; Marika Egyed; Andreas Rose; Benedito Chou; Orly Brion
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.