Literature DB >> 20640506

A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities.

Cathy C Conrad1, Krista G Hilchey.   

Abstract

Worldwide, decision-makers and nongovernment organizations are increasing their use of citizen volunteers to enhance their ability to monitor and manage natural resources, track species at risk, and conserve protected areas. We reviewed the last 10 years of relevant citizen science literature for areas of consensus, divergence, and knowledge gaps. Different community-based monitoring (CBM) activities and governance structures were examined and contrasted. Literature was examined for evidence of common benefits, challenges, and recommendations for successful citizen science. Two major gaps were identified: (1) a need to compare and contrast the success (and the situations that induce success) of CBM programs which present sound evidence of citizen scientists influencing positive environmental changes in the local ecosystems they monitor and (2) more case studies showing use of CBM data by decision-makers or the barriers to linkages and how these might be overcome. If new research focuses on these gaps, and on the differences of opinions that exist, we will have a much better understanding of the social, economic, and ecological benefits of citizen science.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20640506     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-010-1582-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  18 in total

1.  Density-dependent decline of host abundance resulting from a new infectious disease.

Authors:  W M Hochachka; A A Dhondt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Establishing the Canadian Community Monitoring Network.

Authors:  Graham Whitelaw; Hague Vaughan; Brian Craig; David Atkinson
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2003 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Social capital and the collective management of resources.

Authors:  Jules Pretty
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-12-12       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Adaptive management, monitoring, and the ecological sustainability of a thermal-polluted water ecosystem: a case in SW Spain.

Authors:  J F Lavado Contador
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Why most conservation monitoring is, but need not be, a waste of time.

Authors:  Colin J Legg; Laszlo Nagy
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2005-08-19       Impact factor: 6.789

6.  Community based ecological monitoring in Nova Scotia: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Andy Sharpe; Cathy Conrad
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  Air quality survey carried out by schoolchildren: an innovative tool for urban planning.

Authors:  Cristina Nali; Giacomo Lorenzini
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Community-based monitoring frameworks: increasing the effectiveness of environmental stewardship.

Authors:  Catherine T Conrad; Tyson Daoust
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.266

9.  Volunteers and the NBS.

Authors:  T L Root; P Alpert
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-03-04       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Public participation and volunteer help in monitoring programs: An assessment.

Authors:  P Stokes; M Havas; T Brydges
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.513

View more
  99 in total

1.  Improving invasive species management by integrating priorities and contributions of scientists and decision makers.

Authors:  Anouk N'Guyen; Philipp E Hirsch; Irene Adrian-Kalchhauser; Patricia Burkhardt-Holm
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 5.129

2.  Sampling of riverine litter with citizen scientists--findings and recommendations.

Authors:  S Rech; V Macaya-Caquilpán; J F Pantoja; M M Rivadeneira; C Kroeger Campodónico; M Thiel
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  A systems approach to modeling Community-Based Environmental Monitoring: a case of participatory water quality monitoring in rural Mexico.

Authors:  Ana Burgos; Rosaura Páez; Estela Carmona; Hilda Rivas
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Multiplexed paper analytical device for quantification of metals using distance-based detection.

Authors:  David M Cate; Scott D Noblitt; John Volckens; Charles S Henry
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 6.799

5.  Comparing volunteer and professionally collected monitoring data from the rocky subtidal reefs of Southern California, USA.

Authors:  David J Gillett; Daniel J Pondella; Jan Freiwald; Kenneth C Schiff; Jennifer E Caselle; Craig Shuman; Stephen B Weisberg
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Stakeholder opinions on the assessment of MPA effectiveness and their interests to participate at Pacific Rim National Park Reserve, Canada.

Authors:  Nadine Heck; Philip Dearden; Adrian McDonald; Steve Carver
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 7.  Community-based participatory research for the study of air pollution: a review of motivations, approaches, and outcomes.

Authors:  Adwoa Commodore; Sacoby Wilson; Omar Muhammad; Erik Svendsen; John Pearce
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Identifying Effective and Sustainable Measures for Community-Based Environmental Monitoring.

Authors:  Ariana J McKay; Chris J Johnson
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.266

9.  Public engagement on urban air pollution: an exploratory study of two interventions.

Authors:  Christian Oltra; Roser Sala; Àlex Boso; Sergi López Asensio
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 2.513

10.  Student monitoring of the ecological quality of neotropical urban streams.

Authors:  Juliana Silva França; Ricardo Solar; Robert M Hughes; Marcos Callisto
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 5.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.