Mitsuru Yagi1, Hideaki Ohne2, Shinjiro Kaneko2, Masafumi Machida2, Yoshiyuki Yato2, Takashi Asazuma2. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Murayama Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. Electronic address: yagiman@gmail.com. 2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Murayama Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The effect of corrective spine surgery on standing stability in adult spinal deformity (ASD) has not been fully documented. PURPOSE: To compare pre- and postoperative standing balance and posture in patients with ASD. STUDY DESIGN/ SETTING: This study is a prospective case series. PATIENT SAMPLE: Standing balance before and after corrective spine surgery was compared in 35 consecutive female patients with ASD (65.6±6.9 years, body mass index 22.3±2.7 kg/m2, Cobb angle 50.2±19.2°, C7 plumb line 9.3±5.6 cm, and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch 40.8±23.3°). OUTCOME MEASURES: The Scoliosis Research Society Patient Questionnaire, the Oswestry Disability Index, and force-plate analysis were used to evaluate the patient outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed patient charts and X-rays and compared standing balance before and after corrective spine surgery. All subjects were assessed by force-plate analysis using optical markers while standing naturally on a custom-built force platform. The spinal tilt, pelvic obliquity, pelvic tilt, and joint angle were calculated. The lower leg lean volume was obtained by whole-body dual X-ray absorptiometry to assess muscle strength. RESULTS: ASD patients showed significant differences between the left and right sides in ground reaction force (dGRFs), hip (dHip), and knee angle (dKnee) while standing (dGRF 15.1±8.7%, dHip 7.1±6.6°, dKnee 5.9±5.5°). The recorded center-of-gravity (CoG) area was not improved after surgery, whereas the dGRF, dHip, and dKnee all decreased. The spinal tilt, pelvic obliquity, and pelvic tilt were all significantly improved after surgery. We found significant correlations between the radiographic trunk shift and the postoperative coronal CoG distance and recorded CoG area, and between the sagittal CoG distance and the age and the lean volume of the lower extremities (trunk shift R=0.33, 0.45; age R=0.32; lean volume R=0.31). CONCLUSIONS: Corrective spinal surgery improved the spinal alignment and joint angles in patients with ASD but did not improve the standing stability. A correlation found between the sagittal CoG distance and the lean volume of the lower extremities indicated the importance of the leg muscles for stability when standing, whereas a correlation found between the coronal CoG distance and trunk shift reflected the attenuated postural response in the ASD patients.
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The effect of corrective spine surgery on standing stability in adult spinal deformity (ASD) has not been fully documented. PURPOSE: To compare pre- and postoperative standing balance and posture in patients with ASD. STUDY DESIGN/ SETTING: This study is a prospective case series. PATIENT SAMPLE: Standing balance before and after corrective spine surgery was compared in 35 consecutive female patients with ASD (65.6±6.9 years, body mass index 22.3±2.7 kg/m2, Cobb angle 50.2±19.2°, C7 plumb line 9.3±5.6 cm, and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch 40.8±23.3°). OUTCOME MEASURES: The Scoliosis Research Society Patient Questionnaire, the Oswestry Disability Index, and force-plate analysis were used to evaluate the patient outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed patient charts and X-rays and compared standing balance before and after corrective spine surgery. All subjects were assessed by force-plate analysis using optical markers while standing naturally on a custom-built force platform. The spinal tilt, pelvic obliquity, pelvic tilt, and joint angle were calculated. The lower leg lean volume was obtained by whole-body dual X-ray absorptiometry to assess muscle strength. RESULTS:ASDpatients showed significant differences between the left and right sides in ground reaction force (dGRFs), hip (dHip), and knee angle (dKnee) while standing (dGRF 15.1±8.7%, dHip 7.1±6.6°, dKnee 5.9±5.5°). The recorded center-of-gravity (CoG) area was not improved after surgery, whereas the dGRF, dHip, and dKnee all decreased. The spinal tilt, pelvic obliquity, and pelvic tilt were all significantly improved after surgery. We found significant correlations between the radiographic trunk shift and the postoperative coronal CoG distance and recorded CoG area, and between the sagittal CoG distance and the age and the lean volume of the lower extremities (trunk shift R=0.33, 0.45; age R=0.32; lean volume R=0.31). CONCLUSIONS: Corrective spinal surgery improved the spinal alignment and joint angles in patients with ASD but did not improve the standing stability. A correlation found between the sagittal CoG distance and the lean volume of the lower extremities indicated the importance of the leg muscles for stability when standing, whereas a correlation found between the coronal CoG distance and trunk shift reflected the attenuated postural response in the ASDpatients.
Authors: Joseph L Laratta; Steven D Glassman; Abiola A Atanda; John R Dimar; Jeffrey L Gum; Charles H Crawford; Kelly Bratcher; Leah Y Carreon Journal: J Spine Surg Date: 2019-12
Authors: Maxime St-Georges; Alisson R Teles; Oded Rabau; Neil Saran; Jean A Ouellet; Catherine E Ferland Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2020-07-16 Impact factor: 2.362