Literature DB >> 35360471

The Prevalence of Hip Pathologies in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Cole Bortz1, Tyler K Williamson1, Ammar Adenwalla2, Sara Naessig1, Bailey Imbo1, Lara Passfall1, Oscar Krol1, Peter Tretiakov1, Rachel Joujon-Roche1, Kevin Moattari1, Navraj Sagoo2, Salman Ahmad3, Vivek Singh3, Stephane Owusu-Sarpong3, Shaleen Vira2, Bassel Diebo4, Peter G Passias1.   

Abstract

Background: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is the most common form of abnormal spine curvature observed in patients age 10 to 18. Typically characterized by shoulder height and waistline asymmetry, AIS may drive uneven distribution of force in the hips, leading to increased rates of concurrent hip diagnoses. The relationship between AIS and concurrent hip diagnoses is underexplored in the literature, and to date, there has been little research comparing rates of hip diagnoses between patients with AIS and those unaffected. Purpose: Assess differences in rates and clusters of hip diagnoses between patients with AIS and those unaffected. Study design: Retrospective review of Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's (HCUP) Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). Patient sample: 224,504 weighted inpatient discharges. Outcome measures: Rates of hip diagnoses.
Methods: Patients in the NIS database (2005-2013) ages 10-18 years were isolated. Patients were grouped by those diagnosed with AIS (ICD-9: 737.30) and those unaffected. Patient groups were propensity score matched (PSM) for age. Means comparison tests assessed differences in demographic, comorbidity, and diagnosis profiles between patient groups for corresponding age categories. ICD-9 codes were used to identify specific hip diagnoses.
Results: Following PSM, 24,656 AIS and 24,656 unaffected patients were included. The AIS patient group was comprised of more females (66% vs 59%) and had lower rates of obesity (2.4% vs 3.5%, both p < 0.001). Overall, 1.1% of patients had at least one hip diagnosis: congenital deformity (0.31%), developmental dysplasia (0.24%), recurrent dislocation (0.18%), isolated dislocation (0.09%), osteonecrosis (0.08%), osteochondrosis (0.07%), acquired deformity (0.03%), and osteoarthritis (0.02%). AIS patients had lower rates of osteonecrosis (0.04% vs 0.12%, p = 0.003), but higher rates of all other hip diagnoses, including dysplasia (0.41% vs 0.07%, p < 0.001), recurrent dislocation (0.32% vs 0.03%, p < 0.001), isolated dislocation (0.13% vs 0.06%, p < 0.001), and osteoarthritis (0.04% vs 0.01%, p = 0.084. Co-occurrences of hip diagnoses were relatively rare, with 0.03% patients having more than one hip diagnosis. Rates of co-occurring hip diagnoses did not differ between AIS and unaffected groups (0.04% vs 0.02%, p = 0.225). Conclusions: Compared to unaffected patients of similar ages, patients with AIS had higher overall rates of hip diagnoses, including dysplasia and recurrent dislocation. A higher trend of precocious osteoarthritis was also observed at a higher rate in AIS patients, although this difference was not statistically significant. Our results present an argument for surgical realignment in the coronal and sagittal planes to neutralize asymmetrical forces in the hips, and suggest the need for increased awareness and clinical screening for hip-related disorders in AIS patients. Level of Evidence: III.
© 2022 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS); Hip-spine; Pediatric spine; Scoliosis; Spine

Year:  2022        PMID: 35360471      PMCID: PMC8961074          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.02.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  22 in total

Review 1.  Sagittal plane considerations and the pelvis in the adult patient.

Authors:  Frank Schwab; Virginie Lafage; Ashish Patel; Jean-Pierre Farcy
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Sagittal balance and idiopathic scoliosis: does final sagittal alignment influence outcomes, degeneration rate or failure rate?

Authors:  Brice Ilharreborde
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  A meta-analysis of gait in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Dong Suk Kim; Shi Hwan Park; Tae Sik Goh; Seung Min Son; Jung Sub Lee
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 1.961

4.  Classification of coronal imbalance in adult scoliosis and spine deformity: a treatment-oriented guideline.

Authors:  Ibrahim Obeid; Pedro Berjano; Claudio Lamartina; Daniel Chopin; Louis Boissière; Anouar Bourghli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Walking balance and compensatory gait mechanisms in surgically treated patients with adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Mitsuru Yagi; Hideaki Ohne; Tsunehiko Konomi; Kanehiro Fujiyoshi; Shinjiro Kaneko; Masakazu Takemitsu; Masafumi Machida; Yoshiyuki Yato; Takashi Asazuma
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  Does corrective spine surgery improve the standing balance in patients with adult spinal deformity?

Authors:  Mitsuru Yagi; Hideaki Ohne; Shinjiro Kaneko; Masafumi Machida; Yoshiyuki Yato; Takashi Asazuma
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  Analysis of spinal alignment and pelvic parameters on upright radiographs: implications for acetabular development.

Authors:  Andrew Pytiak; James D Bomar; Jonathan B Peterson; Matthew R Schmitz; Andrew T Pennock; Dennis R Wenger; Vidyadhar V Upasani
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2016-04-04

8.  Adolescent spine patients have an increased incidence of acetabular overcoverage.

Authors:  Ena Nielsen; Rachel Y Goldstein
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2018-03-09

9.  Association between adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and sacroiliac joint dysfunction in young athletes: A case control study.

Authors:  Zoran Šarčević; Andreja Tepavčević
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Measurement of scoliosis Cobb angle by end vertebra tilt angle method.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Jin Zhang; Rui Xu; Tie Ge Chen; Kai Sheng Zhou; Hai Hong Zhang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 2.359

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Clinical significance of concomitant pectus deformity and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: systematic review with best evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Laurian J M van Es; Barend J van Royen; Matthijs W N Oomen
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2022-06-25
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.