BACKGROUND: Adult spinal deformity (ASD) is a prevalent condition in individuals over the age of 65; leading to impaired standing balance and abnormal gait patterns. This functional impairment may be due to the fixed sagittal or coronal malalignment; associated spinal stenosis or deconditioning. The Berg balance scale (BBS) was developed to measure balance by assessing the performance of functional tasks. The purpose of this study is to determine if BBS is a useful metric for evaluating functional status in ASD patients. METHODS: ASD patients who required fusion from the thoracic spine to the pelvis from 2014 to 2016 were enrolled and asked to complete the BBS prior to and six months after surgery. BBS were obtained by a certified physical therapist. Standard demographic; radiographic and surgical data were collected. The Oswestry disability index (ODI), EuroQOL-5D and numeric rating scales (0 to 10) for back and leg pain were assessed at baseline and post-intervention. RESULTS: Of 21 patients enrolled; 19 completed pre- and post-surgery BBS. The mean age was 59.8±13.3 years with 14 females. There was a statistically significant improvement in all outcome scores and radiographic parameters after surgery; but no difference in BBS. Only one patient had a BBS score low enough to be considered a medium fall risk. There was no difference in the pre-op BBS scores in the four patients that had revision surgery compared to those that did not. CONCLUSIONS: In this small pilot study; BBS did not appear to be associated with measures of clinical and radiographic improvement in ASD patients. The test was also potentially problematic in that it has a ceiling effect and required significant time with a trained physical therapist for administration. Continued effort to identify a viable measure of balance dysfunction in ASD patients is warranted. 2019 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Adult spinal deformity (ASD) is a prevalent condition in individuals over the age of 65; leading to impaired standing balance and abnormal gait patterns. This functional impairment may be due to the fixed sagittal or coronal malalignment; associated spinal stenosis or deconditioning. The Berg balance scale (BBS) was developed to measure balance by assessing the performance of functional tasks. The purpose of this study is to determine if BBS is a useful metric for evaluating functional status in ASD patients. METHODS: ASD patients who required fusion from the thoracic spine to the pelvis from 2014 to 2016 were enrolled and asked to complete the BBS prior to and six months after surgery. BBS were obtained by a certified physical therapist. Standard demographic; radiographic and surgical data were collected. The Oswestry disability index (ODI), EuroQOL-5D and numeric rating scales (0 to 10) for back and leg pain were assessed at baseline and post-intervention. RESULTS: Of 21 patients enrolled; 19 completed pre- and post-surgery BBS. The mean age was 59.8±13.3 years with 14 females. There was a statistically significant improvement in all outcome scores and radiographic parameters after surgery; but no difference in BBS. Only one patient had a BBS score low enough to be considered a medium fall risk. There was no difference in the pre-op BBS scores in the four patients that had revision surgery compared to those that did not. CONCLUSIONS: In this small pilot study; BBS did not appear to be associated with measures of clinical and radiographic improvement in ASD patients. The test was also potentially problematic in that it has a ceiling effect and required significant time with a trained physical therapist for administration. Continued effort to identify a viable measure of balance dysfunction in ASD patients is warranted. 2019 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.
Authors: L Brett Babat; Robert F McLain; William Bingaman; Iain Kalfas; Phillip Young; Candace Rufo-Smith Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2004-09-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Frank Schwab; Benjamin Ungar; Benjamin Blondel; Jacob Buchowski; Jeffrey Coe; Donald Deinlein; Christopher DeWald; Hossein Mehdian; Christopher Shaffrey; Clifford Tribus; Virginie Lafage Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2012-05-20 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: J R Engsberg; K H Bridwell; A K Reitenbach; M L Uhrich; C Baldus; K Blanke; L G Lenke Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2001-09-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Todd M Chapman; Christine R Baldus; Jon D Lurie; Steven D Glassman; Frank J Schwab; Christopher I Shaffrey; Virginie Lafage; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Han J Kim; Justin S Smith; Charles H Crawford; Lawrence G Lenke; Jacob M Buchowski; Charles Edwards; Tyler Koski; Stefan Parent; Stephen Lewis; Daniel G Kang; Jamal McClendon; Lionel Metz; Lukas P Zebala; Michael P Kelly; Kevin F Spratt; Keith H Bridwell Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 3.241
Authors: Thijs Ackermans; Hannes Tytgat; Erica Beaucage-Gauvreau; Pieter Severijns; Thomas Overbergh; Kristel van de Loock; Sebastiaan Schelfaut; Karl Zabjek; Lennart Scheys; Lieven Moke Journal: Spine Deform Date: 2022-10-19
Authors: Zongpo Shi; Gang Wang; Zhen Jin; Tao Wu; Haoran Wang; Jinpeng Sun; Yap San Min Nicolas; K C Rupesh; Kaixiang Yang; Jun Liu Journal: J Orthop Surg Res Date: 2020-12-01 Impact factor: 2.359
Authors: Eddy Saad; Karl Semaan; Georges Kawkabani; Abir Massaad; Renee Maria Salibv; Mario Mekhael; Marc Fakhoury; Krystel Abi Karam; Elena Jaber; Ismat Ghanem; Virginie Lafage; Wafa Skalli; Rami Rachkidi; Ayman Assi Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol Date: 2022-01-13