Literature DB >> 28549010

A Clinical Feasibility Trial for Identification of Exceptional Responders in Whom Breast Cancer Surgery Can Be Eliminated Following Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy.

Henry M Kuerer1, Gaiane M Rauch2, Savitri Krishnamurthy3, Beatriz E Adrada2, Abigail S Caudle1, Sarah M DeSnyder1, Dalliah M Black1, Lumarie Santiago2, Brian P Hobbs4, Anthony Lucci1, Michael Gilcrease3, Rosa F Hwang1, Rosalind P Candelaria2, Mariana Chavez-MacGregor5,6, Benjamin D Smith7, Elsa Arribas2, Tanya Moseley2, Mediget Teshome1, Makesha V Miggins1, Vicente Valero6, Kelly K Hunt1, Wei T Yang2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and vacuum-assisted core biopsy (VACB) in assessing the presence of residual cancer in the breast after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Pathologic complete response (pCR) rates after NST have improved dramatically, suggesting that surgery might be avoided in some patients. Safe avoidance of surgery would require accurate confirmation of no residual invasive/in situ carcinoma.
METHODS: Forty patients with T1-3N0-3 triple-negative or HER2-positive cancer receiving NST were enrolled in this single-center prospective trial. Patients underwent ultrasound-guided or mammography-guided FNA and VACB of the initial breast tumor region before surgery. Findings were compared with findings on pathologic evaluation of surgical specimens to determine the performance of biopsy in predicting residual breast disease after NST.
RESULTS: Median initial clinical tumor size was 3.3 cm (range, 1.2-7.0 cm); 16 patients (40%) had biopsy-proven nodal metastases. After NST, median clinical tumor size was 1.1 cm (range, 0-4.2 cm). Nineteen patients (47.5%) had a breast pCR and were concordant with pathologic nodal status in 97.5%. Combined FNA/VACB demonstrated an accuracy of 98% (95% CI, 87%-100%), false-negative rate of 5% (95% CI, 0%-24%), and negative predictive value of 95% (95% CI, 75%-100%) in predicting residual breast cancer. VACB alone was more accurate than FNA alone (P = 0.011).
CONCLUSIONS: After NST, image-guided FNA/VACB can accurately identify patients with a breast pCR. Based on these results, a prospective clinical trial has commenced in which breast surgery is omitted in patients with a breast pCR after NST according to image-guided biopsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28549010      PMCID: PMC6051523          DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  14 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of pathologic response in patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic treatment for operable breast cancer. Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium trial 017.

Authors:  Jennifer F De Los Santos; Alan Cantor; Keith D Amos; Andres Forero; Mehra Golshan; Janet K Horton; Clifford A Hudis; Nola M Hylton; Kandace McGuire; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Ingrid M Meszoely; Rita Nanda; E Shelley Hwang
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Identification of Patients With Documented Pathologic Complete Response in the Breast After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Omission of Axillary Surgery.

Authors:  Audree B Tadros; Wei T Yang; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Gaiane M Rauch; Benjamin D Smith; Vicente Valero; Dalliah M Black; Anthony Lucci; Abigail S Caudle; Sarah M DeSnyder; Mediget Teshome; Carlos H Barcenas; Makesha Miggins; Beatriz E Adrada; Tanya Moseley; Rosa F Hwang; Kelly K Hunt; Henry M Kuerer
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 3.  Meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting residual breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Michael L Marinovich; Nehmat Houssami; Petra Macaskill; Francesco Sardanelli; Les Irwig; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Gunter von Minckwitz; Meagan E Brennan; Stefano Ciatto
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Locoregional Control According to Breast Cancer Subtype and Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Breast-conserving Therapy.

Authors:  Shannon K Swisher; Jose Vila; Susan L Tucker; Isabelle Bedrosian; Simona F Shaitelman; Jennifer K Litton; Benjamin D Smith; Abigail S Caudle; Henry M Kuerer; Elizabeth A Mittendorf
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Recommended tests and confidence intervals for paired binomial proportions.

Authors:  Morten W Fagerland; Stian Lydersen; Petter Laake
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Can Routine Imaging After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Predict Pathologic Complete Response?

Authors:  B Schaefgen; M Mati; H P Sinn; M Golatta; A Stieber; G Rauch; A Hennigs; H Richter; C Domschke; F Schuetz; C Sohn; A Schneeweiss; Joerg Heil
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in women with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early HER2-positive breast cancer (NeoSphere): a randomised multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Luca Gianni; Tadeusz Pienkowski; Young-Hyuck Im; Laslo Roman; Ling-Ming Tseng; Mei-Ching Liu; Ana Lluch; Elżbieta Staroslawska; Juan de la Haba-Rodriguez; Seock-Ah Im; Jose Luiz Pedrini; Brigitte Poirier; Paolo Morandi; Vladimir Semiglazov; Vichien Srimuninnimit; Giulia Bianchi; Tania Szado; Jayantha Ratnayake; Graham Ross; Pinuccia Valagussa
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Cytologically proven axillary lymph node metastases are eradicated in patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy with concurrent trastuzumab for HER2-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura S Dominici; Viviana M Negron Gonzalez; Aman U Buzdar; Anthony Lucci; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Huong T Le-Petross; Gildy V Babiera; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Kelly K Hunt; Henry M Kuerer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Predictors of locoregional recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: results from combined analysis of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18 and B-27.

Authors:  Eleftherios P Mamounas; Stewart J Anderson; James J Dignam; Harry D Bear; Thomas B Julian; Charles E Geyer; Alphonse Taghian; D Lawrence Wickerham; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  Selective elimination of breast cancer surgery in exceptional responders: historical perspective and current trials.

Authors:  Raquel F D van la Parra; Henry M Kuerer
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  46 in total

1.  Association of Low Nodal Positivity Rate Among Patients With ERBB2-Positive or Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and Breast Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Alison U Barron; Tanya L Hoskin; Courtney N Day; E Shelley Hwang; Henry M Kuerer; Judy C Boughey
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 14.766

2.  Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Evaluation of Pathologic Complete Response in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-Positive Breast Cancer After HER2-Targeted Therapy.

Authors:  Laura Heacock; Alana Lewin; Abimbola Ayoola; Melanie Moccaldi; James S Babb; Sungheon G Kim; Linda Moy
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Concerning Dediu M, Zielinski A: A Proposal to Redefine Pathologic Complete Remission as Endpoint following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Early Breast Cancer. Breast Care 2019; Doi 10.1159/000500620.

Authors:  Michael Untch; Sibylle Loibl; Peter A Fasching
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 4.  Locoregional Management After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Monica Morrow; Atif J Khan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Baseline factors predicting a response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with implications for non-surgical management of triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  R F D van la Parra; A B Tadros; C M Checka; G M Rauch; A Lucci; B D Smith; S Krishnamurthy; V Valero; W T Yang; H M Kuerer
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  MRI does not predict pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Stephen F Sener; Rachel E Sargent; Connie Lee; Tejas Manchandia; Vivian Le-Tran; Yuliya Olimpiadi; Nicole Zaremba; Andrew Alabd; Maria Nelson; Julie E Lang
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.454

7.  Optimal Selection of Breast Cancer Patients for Elimination of Surgery Following Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy.

Authors:  Henry M Kuerer; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Gaiane M Rauch; Wei T Yang; Benjamin D Smith; Vicente Valero
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Prediction of Pathologic Complete Response in Breast Cancer Patients Comparing Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Ultrasound in Neoadjuvant Setting.

Authors:  Frederik Knude Palshof; Charlotte Lanng; Niels Kroman; Cemil Benian; Ilse Vejborg; Anne Bak; Maj-Lis Talman; Eva Balslev; Tove Filtenborg Tvedskov
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Contrast-enhanced MRI after neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer: lesion-to-background parenchymal signal enhancement ratio for discriminating pathological complete response from minimal residual tumour.

Authors:  Soo-Yeon Kim; Nariya Cho; Sung Ui Shin; Han-Byoel Lee; Wonshik Han; In Ae Park; Bo Ra Kwon; Soo Yeon Kim; Su Hyun Lee; Jung Min Chang; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  The Clinical Significance of Breast-only and Node-only Pathologic Complete Response (pCR) After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NACT): A Review of 20,000 Breast Cancer Patients in the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB).

Authors:  Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Yi Ren; Samantha M Thomas; Rachel A Greenup; Jennifer K Plichta; Laura H Rosenberger; Nina Tamirisa; Jeremy Force; Judy C Boughey; Terry Hyslop; E Shelley Hwang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.