Literature DB >> 29465744

Baseline factors predicting a response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with implications for non-surgical management of triple-negative breast cancer.

R F D van la Parra1, A B Tadros1, C M Checka1, G M Rauch2, A Lucci1, B D Smith3, S Krishnamurthy4, V Valero5, W T Yang2, H M Kuerer1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and a pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be suitable for non-surgical management. The goal of this study was to identify baseline clinicopathological variables that are associated with residual disease, and to evaluate the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on both the invasive and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) components in TNBC.
METHODS: Patients with TNBC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgical resection were identified. Patients with a pCR were compared with those who had residual disease in the breast and/or lymph nodes. Clinicopathological variables were analysed to determine their association with residual disease.
RESULTS: Of the 328 patients, 36·9 per cent had no residual disease and 9·1 per cent had residual DCIS only. Patients with residual disease were more likely to have malignant microcalcifications (P = 0·023) and DCIS on the initial core needle biopsy (CNB) (P = 0·030). Variables independently associated with residual disease included: DCIS on CNB (odds ratio (OR) 2·46; P = 0·022), T2 disease (OR 2·40; P = 0·029), N1 status (OR 2·03; P = 0·030) and low Ki-67 (OR 2·41; P = 0·083). Imaging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy had an accuracy of 71·7 (95 per cent c.i. 66·3 to 76·6) per cent and a negative predictive value of 76·9 (60·7 to 88·9) per cent for identifying residual disease in the breast and lymph nodes. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not eradicate the DCIS component in 55 per cent of patients.
CONCLUSION: The presence of microcalcifications on imaging and DCIS on initial CNB are associated with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in TNBC. These variables can aid in identifying patients with TNBC suitable for inclusion in trials evaluating non-surgical management after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
© 2018 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29465744      PMCID: PMC7938811          DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  30 in total

1.  Identification of Patients With Documented Pathologic Complete Response in the Breast After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Omission of Axillary Surgery.

Authors:  Audree B Tadros; Wei T Yang; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Gaiane M Rauch; Benjamin D Smith; Vicente Valero; Dalliah M Black; Anthony Lucci; Abigail S Caudle; Sarah M DeSnyder; Mediget Teshome; Carlos H Barcenas; Makesha Miggins; Beatriz E Adrada; Tanya Moseley; Rosa F Hwang; Kelly K Hunt; Henry M Kuerer
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 14.766

2.  Prognostic value of Ki67 expression in HR-negative breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Qi-Xing Tan; Qing-Hong Qin; Wei-Ping Yang; Qin-Guo Mo; Chang-Yuan Wei
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-09-15

3.  Accuracy of the combination of mammography and sonography in predicting tumor response in breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Florentia Peintinger; Henry M Kuerer; Keith Anderson; Judy C Boughey; Funda Meric-Bernstam; S Eva Singletary; Kelly K Hunt; Gary J Whitman; Tanya Stephens; Aman U Buzdar; Marjorie C Green; W Fraser Symmans
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Clinical course of breast cancer patients with complete pathologic primary tumor and axillary lymph node response to doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  H M Kuerer; L A Newman; T L Smith; F C Ames; K K Hunt; K Dhingra; R L Theriault; G Singh; S M Binkley; N Sneige; T A Buchholz; M I Ross; M D McNeese; A U Buzdar; G N Hortobagyi; S E Singletary
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  A Clinical Feasibility Trial for Identification of Exceptional Responders in Whom Breast Cancer Surgery Can Be Eliminated Following Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy.

Authors:  Henry M Kuerer; Gaiane M Rauch; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Beatriz E Adrada; Abigail S Caudle; Sarah M DeSnyder; Dalliah M Black; Lumarie Santiago; Brian P Hobbs; Anthony Lucci; Michael Gilcrease; Rosa F Hwang; Rosalind P Candelaria; Mariana Chavez-MacGregor; Benjamin D Smith; Elsa Arribas; Tanya Moseley; Mediget Teshome; Makesha V Miggins; Vicente Valero; Kelly K Hunt; Wei T Yang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Presenting features of breast cancer differ by molecular subtype.

Authors:  Lisa Wiechmann; Michelle Sampson; Michelle Stempel; Lindsay M Jacks; Sujata M Patil; Tari King; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-07-11       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  EGFR as paradoxical predictor of chemosensitivity and outcome among triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Hiroko Nogi; Tadashi Kobayashi; Masafumi Suzuki; Isao Tabei; Kazumi Kawase; Yasuo Toriumi; Hisaki Fukushima; Ken Uchida
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.906

8.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

Authors:  E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Ki-67 can be used for further classification of triple negative breast cancer into two subtypes with different response and prognosis.

Authors:  Bhumsuk Keam; Seock-Ah Im; Kyung-Hun Lee; Sae-Won Han; Do-Youn Oh; Jee Hyun Kim; Se-Hoon Lee; Wonshik Han; Dong-Wan Kim; Tae-You Kim; In Ae Park; Dong-Young Noh; Dae Seog Heo; Yung-Jue Bang
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging after Completion of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Can Accurately Discriminate between No Residual Carcinoma and Residual Ductal Carcinoma In Situ in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Seho Park; Jung Hyun Yoon; Joohyuk Sohn; Hyung Seok Park; Hee Jung Moon; Min Jung Kim; Eun-Kyung Kim; Seung Il Kim; Byeong-Woo Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Innovative Standards in Surgery of the Breast after Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy.

Authors:  Tal Hadar; Michael Koretz; Mahmood Nawass; Tanir M Allweis
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  MRI-Based Digital Models Forecast Patient-Specific Treatment Responses to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Chengyue Wu; Angela M Jarrett; Zijian Zhou; Nabil Elshafeey; Beatriz E Adrada; Rosalind P Candelaria; Rania M M Mohamed; Medine Boge; Lei Huo; Jason B White; Debu Tripathy; Vicente Valero; Jennifer K Litton; Clinton Yam; Jong Bum Son; Jingfei Ma; Gaiane M Rauch; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 13.312

3.  Multivariable Models Based on Baseline Imaging Features and Clinicopathological Characteristics to Predict Breast Pathologic Response after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Peixian Chen; Chuan Wang; Ruiliang Lu; Ruilin Pan; Lewei Zhu; Dan Zhou; Guolin Ye
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 2.268

Review 4.  Metastatic and triple-negative breast cancer: challenges and treatment options.

Authors:  Sumayah Al-Mahmood; Justin Sapiezynski; Olga B Garbuzenko; Tamara Minko
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.617

5.  Are baseline ultrasound and mammographic features associated with rates of pathological completes response in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer?

Authors:  Sarah L Savaridas; Yee Ting Sim; Sarah J Vinnicombe; Colin A Purdie; Alastair M Thompson; Andy Evans
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 3.909

6.  Platinum is essential in neoadjuvant treatment of triple-negative breast cancer: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Junjie Li; Li Chen; Wei Tan; Fang Qi; Yang Zhang; Zhonghua Wang; Zhimin Shao
Journal:  Cancer Biol Med       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 5.347

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.