Literature DB >> 28548214

The performance of MALBAC and MDA methods in the identification of concurrent mutations and aneuploidy screening to diagnose beta-thalassaemia disorders at the single- and multiple-cell levels.

WeiQiang Liu1, HuiMin Zhang1, Dan Hu1, SiJia Lu2, XiaoFang Sun1.   

Abstract

AIM: To select an optimal whole-genome amplification (WGA) method to improve the efficiency of the preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening (PGD/PGS) of beta-thalassaemia disorders.
METHODS: Fifty-seven fibroblast samples with defined beta-thalassaemia variations and forty-eight single-blastomere samples were amplified from single-, two-, and five-cell samples by multiple annealing and looping-based amplification cycles (MALBAC) and the multiple displacement amplification (MDA) method. Low-depth, high-throughput sequencing was performed to evaluate and compare the coefficiencies of the chromosomal copy number variation (CNV) detection rate and the allele dropout (ADO) rate between these two methods.
RESULTS: At the single-cell level, the success rates of the CNV detection in the fibroblast samples were 100% in the MALBAC group and 91.67% in the MDA group; the coefficient of variation in the CNV detection in the MALBAC group was significantly superior to that in the MDA group (0.15 vs 0.37). The total ADO rate in the HBB allele detection was 4.55% in the MALBAC group, which was significantly lower than the 22.5% rate observed in the MDA group. However, when five or more cells were used as the starting template, the ADO rate significantly decreased, and these two methods did not differ significantly.
CONCLUSIONS: For the genetic diagnosis of HBB gene variation at the single-cell level, MALBAC is a more suitable method due to its higher level of uniformity and specificity. When five or more cells are used as the starting template, both methods exhibit similar efficiency, increased accuracy, and a similar success rate in PGD/PGS.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  beta-thalassaemia; multiple annealing and looping-based amplification cycles; multiple displacement amplification; whole-genome amplification efficiency

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28548214      PMCID: PMC6817139          DOI: 10.1002/jcla.22267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal        ISSN: 0887-8013            Impact factor:   2.352


  33 in total

1.  Rapid amplification of plasmid and phage DNA using Phi 29 DNA polymerase and multiply-primed rolling circle amplification.

Authors:  F B Dean; J R Nelson; T L Giesler; R S Lasken
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Single-cell sequencing in its prime.

Authors:  Roger S Lasken
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Genome-wide detection of single-nucleotide and copy-number variations of a single human cell.

Authors:  Chenghang Zong; Sijia Lu; Alec R Chapman; X Sunney Xie
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Single-neuron sequencing analysis of L1 retrotransposition and somatic mutation in the human brain.

Authors:  Gilad D Evrony; Xuyu Cai; Eunjung Lee; L Benjamin Hills; Princess C Elhosary; Hillel S Lehmann; J J Parker; Kutay D Atabay; Edward C Gilmore; Annapurna Poduri; Peter J Park; Christopher A Walsh
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  A New Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Assay for Concurrent Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis of Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Type 1A and Aneuploidy Screening.

Authors:  Baoheng Gui; Pu Yang; Zhongyuan Yao; Yanping Li; Donge Liu; Nenghui Liu; Sijia Lu; Desheng Liang; Lingqian Wu
Journal:  J Genet Genomics       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 4.275

6.  Fetal loss rate after chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: an 11-year national registry study.

Authors:  A Tabor; C H F Vestergaard; Ø Lidegaard
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 7.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis guided by single-cell genomics.

Authors:  Niels Van der Aa; Masoud Zamani Esteki; Joris R Vermeesch; Thierry Voet
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 11.117

8.  Comparison of variations detection between whole-genome amplification methods used in single-cell resequencing.

Authors:  Yong Hou; Kui Wu; Xulian Shi; Fuqiang Li; Luting Song; Hanjie Wu; Michael Dean; Guibo Li; Shirley Tsang; Runze Jiang; Xiaolong Zhang; Bo Li; Geng Liu; Niharika Bedekar; Na Lu; Guoyun Xie; Han Liang; Liao Chang; Ting Wang; Jianghao Chen; Yingrui Li; Xiuqing Zhang; Huanming Yang; Xun Xu; Ling Wang; Jun Wang
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 6.524

Review 9.  Single cell genomics: advances and future perspectives.

Authors:  Iain C Macaulay; Thierry Voet
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Consistent and reproducible outcomes of blastocyst biopsy and aneuploidy screening across different biopsy practitioners: a multicentre study involving 2586 embryo biopsies.

Authors:  Antonio Capalbo; Filippo Maria Ubaldi; Danilo Cimadomo; Roberta Maggiulli; Cristina Patassini; Ludovica Dusi; Federica Sanges; Laura Buffo; Roberta Venturella; Laura Rienzi
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  9 in total

1.  PaSD-qc: quality control for single cell whole-genome sequencing data using power spectral density estimation.

Authors:  Maxwell A Sherman; Alison R Barton; Michael A Lodato; Carl Vitzthum; Michael E Coulter; Christopher A Walsh; Peter J Park
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  ART strategies in Klinefelter syndrome.

Authors:  Wei Chen; Ming Zhu Bai; Yixia Yang; Di Sun; Sufang Wu; Jian Sun; Yu Wu; Youji Feng; Youheng Wei; Zijiang Chen; Zhenbo Zhang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  The performance of MALBAC and MDA methods in the identification of concurrent mutations and aneuploidy screening to diagnose beta-thalassaemia disorders at the single- and multiple-cell levels.

Authors:  WeiQiang Liu; HuiMin Zhang; Dan Hu; SiJia Lu; XiaoFang Sun
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 2.352

Review 4.  Overview and recent developments in cell-based noninvasive prenatal testing.

Authors:  Liesbeth Vossaert; Imen Chakchouk; Roni Zemet; Ignatia B Van den Veyver
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.242

5.  Improved clinical outcomes of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy using MALBAC-NGS compared with MDA-SNP array.

Authors:  Wenbin Niu; Linlin Wang; Jiawei Xu; Ying Li; Hao Shi; Gang Li; Haixia Jin; Wenyan Song; Fang Wang; Yingpu Sun
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Comparison of Multiple Displacement Amplification (MDA) and Multiple Annealing and Looping-Based Amplification Cycles (MALBAC) in Limited DNA Sequencing Based on Tube and Droplet.

Authors:  Xiaoxiang Zhou; Ying Xu; Libo Zhu; Zhen Su; Xiaoming Han; Zhen Zhang; Yan Huang; Quanjun Liu
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 2.891

7.  A Rapid NGS-Based Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Chromosomal Abnormalities in Day-3 Blastomere Biopsy Allows Embryo Transfer Within the Same Treatment Cycle.

Authors:  Yinghui Ye; Jieliang Ma; Long Cui; Sijia Lu; Fan Jin
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 8.  Recent advances and application of whole genome amplification in molecular diagnosis and medicine.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Wang; Yapeng Liu; Hongna Liu; Wenjing Pan; Jie Ren; Xiangming Zheng; Yimin Tan; Zhu Chen; Yan Deng; Nongyue He; Hui Chen; Song Li
Journal:  MedComm (2020)       Date:  2022-02-03

Review 9.  Advances in Genetic Diagnosis of Kallmann Syndrome and Genetic Interruption.

Authors:  Yujun Liu; Xu Zhi
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 2.924

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.