| Literature DB >> 28547247 |
Sebastian Żmudzki1, Natnael T Hamda2, Patrycja Gibas-Tybur3.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to determine the influence of migration on copper (Cu) kinetics of male Tribolium castaneum after 25 generations of exposure for Cu-adapted and non-Cu-adapted inbred lines. Adapted lines were kept on a flour medium contaminated with 1000 mg Cu kg-1. A medium contaminated with 2000 mg Cu kg-1 of copper was used during the intoxication phase. Based on our data and literature reports, we introduced a new two-phase four-stage toxicokinetics (TK) model. The intoxication phase was successfully divided into three stages with separate assimilation rate constant (ka) and elimination rate constant (ke) values. The influence of migration was examined by comparing ka and ke parameters confidence intervals. In non-contaminated environments, migrants significantly increased ka and ke values in the second stage. Migrants decreased the maximum Cu accumulation observed in the experiment. The results indicated that the TK model must show high goodness-of-fit to be a useful tool for comparing treatments.Entities:
Keywords: Copper adaptation; Copper tolerance; Midgut physiology; TK model
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28547247 PMCID: PMC5487540 DOI: 10.1007/s00128-017-2093-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bull Environ Contam Toxicol ISSN: 0007-4861 Impact factor: 2.151
Fig. 1Design of the migration experiment. After-migration lines (AML): NM no migrations, IM50 internal migrations (50% migrants from the same selection environment), EM20 external migrations (20% migrants from different selection environment), EM50 external migrations (50% migrants from different selection environment)
Fig. 2Copper kinetics in T. castaneum described by a two-phase, four-stage model in the experiment simulating migration between Cu-adapted and non-adapted populations
Kinetics parameters [accumulation rate constant (ka), elimination rate constant (ke)] related to Cu total concentrations in T. castaneum from the migration experiment (selection environment: non-contaminated medium)
| Phase | Stage | NM | IM50 | EM20 | EM50 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I Intoxication | 1 Accumulation | ka1(day−1) | 1.439 × 10−5A | 13.14 × 10−5A | 1.612 × 10−5A | 1.562 × 10−5A |
| (2.122 × 10−6–2.667 × 10−5) | (0–0.199) | (0–1.126 × 10−4) | (0–3.23 × 10−5) | |||
| ke1(day−1) | 1.146 × 10−5A | 1.093 × 10−5A | 0.467 × 10−5A | 0.191 A | ||
| (0–0.355) | (5.331 × 10−6–1.654 × 10−5) | (0–3.872) | (0–0.755) | |||
| R2 1 | 93.8% | 98.6% | 70.9% | 91% | ||
| 2 Depuration | ka2(day−1) | 5.792 × 10−6B | 15.78 × 10−6A | 2.239 × 10−6B | 6.308 × 10−6AB | |
| (5.785 × 10−6–5.999 × 10−6) | (15.78 × 10−6–15.79 × 10−6) | (0–6.844 × 10−6) | (0–2.397 × 10−5) | |||
| ke2(day−1) | 0.297B | 0.589A | 0.160C | 0.214ABC | ||
| (0.297–0.297) | (0.589–0.589) | (0.051–0.269) | (0–0.672) | |||
| R2 2 | 100% | 100% | 99.9% | 96.6% | ||
| 3 Stabilization | ka3(day−1) | 1.343 × 10−5A | 2.189 × 10−6A | 8.425 × 10−4A | 6.042 × 10−6A | |
| (0–5.346) | (0–1.099 × 10−5) | (0–6.147 × 10−4) | (0–1.946 × 10−5) | |||
| ke3(day−1) | 0.309 A | 4.094 × 10−2A | 21.61 A | 0.13 A | ||
| (0–1.256) | (0–0.282) | (0–1576 × 106) | (0–0.459) | |||
| R2 3 | 28.6% | 76.7% | 31.7% | 87.8% | ||
| II Elimination | 4 Elimination | ka4(day−1) | 8.157 × 10−4A | 3.102 × 10−7A | 9.908 × 10−4A | 8.116 × 10−4A |
| (0–5.54 × 10−3) | (0–9.139 × 10−7) | (0–7.103 × 10−3) | (0–1.108 × 10−2) | |||
| ke4(day−1) | 0.122 | 0.072 | 0.113 | 0.118 | ||
| (0–0.457) | (0.02–0.125) | (0–0.556) | (0–0.85) | |||
| R2 5 | 94.1% | 82.4% | 84.2% | 40.8% |
The 95% confidence intervals are shown in brackets
Coefficients of determination (R2) describe the proportion of variance in beetle Cu body concentrations explained by the fitted model
Subscripted numbers associated with k and R denote the four stages of the model as follows: 1 the accumulation stage, 2 the depuration stage, 3 the stabilization stage, 4 the elimination stage
Abbreviations denote after migration lines (AML): NM control lines with no migrants maintained under the same regime as in the main selection experiment, IM50 lines with 50% ‘internal’ migrants (from the same environment type), EM20 and EM50 migrants derived from a line from different selection environment; 20% or 50% of migrants respectively
Differences between the confidence intervals of kinetics parameters (ka and ke) are shown as letters (A, B, C) for a single phase, and single constant (A, B, C)
Kinetics parameters [accumulation rate constant (ka), elimination rate constant (ke)] related to total Cu concentrations in T. castaneum from the migration experiment (selection environment: Cu-contaminated medium)
| Phase | Stage | NM | IM50 | EM20 | EM50 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I Intoxication | 1 Accumulation | ka1(day−1) | 2.752 × 10−5A | 1.261 × 10−5A | 1.846 × 10−5A | 1.325 × 10−5A |
| (0–9.75 × 10−4) | (0–3.452 × 10−5) | (0–6.180 × 10−5) | (0–1.281 × 10−4) | |||
| ke1(day−1) | 4.814 × 10−6A | 9.142 × 10−2A | 1.208 × 10−5A | 5.547 × 10−6A | ||
| (0–1.986 × 10−5) | (0–0.673) | (0–15.47) | (0–3.611) | |||
| R2 1 | 84.1% | 89.9% | 77% | 79.6% | ||
| 2 Depuration | ka2(day−1) | 2.024 × 10−7A | 2.024 × 10−6AB | 1.874 × 10−5B | 1.483 × 10−4AB | |
| (0–1.089 × 10−5) | (0–2.190 × 10−5) | (1.874 × 10−5 − 1.874 × 10−5) | (0–1.061−2) | |||
| ke2(day−1) | 0.055A | 0.104A | 0.578A | 3.321A | ||
| (0–0.306) | (0–0.534) | (0.578–0.578) | (0–237.4) | |||
| R2 2(day−1) | 99.2% | 96.3% | 100% | 90.6% | ||
| 3 Stabilization | ka3(day−1) | 1.468 × 10−5A | 1.041 × 10−5A | 9.098 × 10−6A | 8.577 × 10−6A | |
| (0–6.127 × 10−5) | (0–5.927 × 10−5) | (0–5.160 × 10−5) | (7.728 × 10−6–9.385 × 10−6) | |||
| ke3(day−1) | 0.263 A | 0.214 A | 0.206 A | 0.181 A | ||
| (0–1.15) | (0–1.288) | (0–1.208) | (0.162–0.199) | |||
| R2 3 | 55.7% | 55% | 21.7% | 99.9% | ||
| II Elimination | 4 Elimination | ka4(day−1) | 2.467 × 10−3A | 5.038 × 10−8A | 5.298 × 10−8A | 4.175 × 10−3A |
| (0–1.527 × 10−2) | (0–2.732 × 10 − 7) | (0–1.775 × 10−7) | (0–0.015) | |||
| ke4(day−1) | 0.177A | 0.043A | 0.030A | 0.298A | ||
| (0–0.970) | (0–0.077) | (0.005–0.055) | (0–0.960) | |||
| R2 5 | 79.6% | 67.6% | 52.9% | 94.1% |
The 95% confidence intervals are shown in brackets
Coefficients of determination (R2) describe the proportion of variance in beetle Cu body concentrations explained by the fitted model
Subscripted numbers associated with k and R denote the four stages of the model as follows: 1 the accumulation stage, 2 the depuration stage, 3 the stabilization stage, 4 the elimination stage
Abbreviations denote after migration lines (AML): NM control lines with no migrants maintained under the same regime as in the main selection experiment, IM50 lines with 50% ‘internal’ migrants (from the same environment type), EM20 and EM50 migrants derived from a line from different selection environment; 20% or 50% of migrants respectively
Differences between the confidence intervals of kinetics parameters (ka and ke) are shown as letters (A, B, C) for a single phase, and single constant (A, B, C)