Literature DB >> 28545841

Oncologic Outcomes for Patients with Residual Cancer at Cystectomy Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Pathologic Stage-matched Analysis.

Bimal Bhindi1, Igor Frank1, Ross J Mason1, Robert F Tarrell2, Prabin Thapa2, John C Cheville3, Brian A Costello4, Lance C Pagliaro4, R Jeffrey Karnes1, R Houston Thompson1, Matthew K Tollefson1, Stephen A Boorjian5.   

Abstract

While it has been demonstrated that receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) before radical cystectomy (RC) improves survival compared to RC alone, the driving factor for this benefit may be from patients with ypT0 status at surgery. Meanwhile, the implications of having residual urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (rUCB) at RC after NAC are less clear. We therefore evaluated whether survival differed between patients with rUCB at RC after NAC and stage-matched controls who underwent RC alone. Patients who underwent NAC + RC (n = 180) were matched to controls who underwent RC alone (n=324) on the basis of pT and pN stage, margin status, and year of RC. The 5-yr recurrence-free survival (RFS; 90% vs 94%; p=1), cancer-specific survival (CSS; 82% vs 93%; p=0.4), and overall survival (OS; 82% vs 82%; p=0.5) were not significantly different between the NAC and control groups for patients with ypT0N0/pT0N0 disease (n=103). Conversely, among patients with rUCB at RC (n=401), patients who received NAC had significantly worse 5-yr RFS (50% vs 63%; p=0.01), CSS (40% vs 59%; p=0.003), and OS (33% vs 48%; p=0.02). On multivariable analysis for patients with rUCB, NAC receipt remained independently associated with worse RFS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-2.66; p=0.001), CSS (HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.30-2.52; p<0.001), and OS (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.18-2.08; p=0.002). Limitations include potential for selection bias owing to the retrospective observational design. Thus, while patients who achieve a complete response to NAC have excellent survival outcomes, those with rUCB after NAC have a worse prognosis compared to stage-matched controls undergoing RC alone. It may be worthwhile considering these patients for clinical trials evaluating the role of additional treatments after RC using newer agents while we await further research on predicting which patients achieve ypT0 status from NAC before RC. PATIENT
SUMMARY: On surgical removal of the bladder, patients without residual bladder cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy have excellent survival outcomes. However, patients with residual cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery have worse outcomes compared to patients undergoing surgery alone. These patients should therefore be considered for additional treatments after surgery using newer agents while we await further research on predicting which patients will benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy before bladder removal for cancer.
Copyright © 2017 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antineoplastic agents; Cisplatin; Cystectomy; Neoadjuvant therapy; Urinary bladder neoplasms

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28545841     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.05.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  15 in total

1.  Should every patient with muscle-invasive bladder cancer receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy?

Authors:  Moritz Maas; Arnulf Stenzl
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-07

2.  Should we spare neoadjuvant chemotherapy in low-risk muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients scheduled for radical cystectomy?

Authors:  Günter Niegisch
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-07

3.  Modeling 1-year Relapse-free Survival After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Radical Cystectomy in Patients with Clinical T2-4N0M0 Urothelial Bladder Carcinoma: Endpoints for Phase 2 Trials.

Authors:  Marco Bandini; Alberto Briganti; Elizabeth R Plimack; Günter Niegisch; Evan Y Yu; Aristotelis Bamias; Neeraj Agarwal; Srikala S Sridhar; Cora N Sternberg; Ulka Vaishampayan; Christine Théodore; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Joaquim Bellmunt; Matthew D Galsky; Francesco Montorsi; Andrea Necchi
Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol       Date:  2018-09-07

4.  Nomogram based on baseline clinicopathological characteristics for predicting bladder cancer-specific survival to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Albert Font; Montserrat Domenech; Oscar Buisan; Hector Lopez; Andrea González; Olatz Etxaniz; Marta Matas; Xavier Elias; Maica Gomez; Mariona Figols; Judith Horneros; Juan Carlos Pardo; Lucia Notario; Vicenç Ruiz de Porras; Ignacio Perez; Joan Areal; Anna Esteve
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 3.661

5.  Overall survival in patients with residual disease after radical cystectomy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Izak Faiena; Amirali Salmasi; Neil Mendhiratta; Andrew T Lenis; Aydin Pooli; Alexandra Drakaki; Kiran Gollapudi; Jeremy Blumberg; Allan J Pantuck; Karim Chamie
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Modelling cost-effectiveness of a biomarker-based approach to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Yair Lotan; Solomon L Woldu; Oner Sanli; Peter Black; Matthew I Milowsky
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Predictive value of phenotypic signatures of bladder cancer response to cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Patrick J Hensley; Natasha Kyprianou; Matthew S Purdom; Daheng He; Vincent DiCarlo; Chi Wang; Andrew C James
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 2.954

Review 8.  Peri-operative chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: status-quo in 2017.

Authors:  Benjamin Pradère; Constance Thibault; Malte W Vetterlein; Jeffrey J Leow; Benoit Peyronnet; Morgan Rouprêt; Thomas Seisen
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-12

9.  Adjuvant chemotherapy versus observation after radical cystectomy in patients with node-positive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Sahyun Pak; Dalsan You; In Gab Jeong; Cheryn Song; Jae-Lyun Lee; Bumsik Hong; Jun Hyuk Hong; Choung-Soo Kim; Hanjong Ahn
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Changes in neoadjuvant chemotherapy utilization in muscle invasive bladder cancer treatment: a tertiary center retrospective study.

Authors:  Katarzyna Gronostaj; Anna Katarzyna Czech; Jakub Fronczek; Tomasz Wiatr; Mikołaj Przydacz; Przemysław Dudek; Łukasz Curyło; Wojciech Szczeklik; Piotr Chłosta
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2020-02-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.