Literature DB >> 31200838

Modeling 1-year Relapse-free Survival After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Radical Cystectomy in Patients with Clinical T2-4N0M0 Urothelial Bladder Carcinoma: Endpoints for Phase 2 Trials.

Marco Bandini1, Alberto Briganti2, Elizabeth R Plimack3, Günter Niegisch4, Evan Y Yu5, Aristotelis Bamias6, Neeraj Agarwal7, Srikala S Sridhar8, Cora N Sternberg9, Ulka Vaishampayan10, Christine Théodore11, Jonathan E Rosenberg12, Joaquim Bellmunt13, Matthew D Galsky14, Francesco Montorsi2, Andrea Necchi15.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several ongoing phase 2 trials are evaluating new neoadjuvant therapy regimens in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). The 1-yr recurrence-free survival (RFS) after radical cystectomy (RC), with or without perioperative chemotherapy, can be used to model statistical assumptions and interpret outcomes from these studies.
OBJECTIVE: To provide a benchmark for predicting 1-yr RFS in patients with cT2-4N0 MIBC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We identified 950 patients with clinical stage T2-4N0 MIBC undergoing RC at 27 centers between 1990 and 2016. We assessed 1-yr RFS rates for patients managed with no perioperative chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), or NAC followed by AC. Cox regression analyses tested for 1-yr postsurgical RFS predictors. A Cox-based nomogram was developed to estimate 1-yr RFS and its accuracy was assessed in terms of Harrell's c-index, a calibration plot, and decision curve analysis. We report 1-yr RFS rates across the nomogram tertiles. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The 1-yr RFS rates were 67.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 64-72) after no perioperative chemotherapy, 76.9% (95% CI 72-83%) after NAC, 77.8% (95% CI 71-85%) after AC, and 57% (95% CI 37-87) after NAC+AC. On multivariable analysis, positive surgical margins (p=0.002), pT stage (p<0.0001), and pN stage (p<.0001) were significantly associated with RFS, while NAC was not (p=0.6). The model including all these factors yielded a c-index of 0.76 (95% CI 0.72-0.79), good calibration, and a high net benefit. The 1-yr RFS rates across nomogram tertiles were 90.5% (95% CI 87-94%), 73.4% (95% CI 68-79%), and 51.1% (95% CI 45-58%), respectively. The results lack external validation.
CONCLUSIONS: Benchmark 1-yr RFS estimates for phase 2 design of new neoadjuvant trials are proposed and can be used for statistical assumptions, pending external validation. PATIENT
SUMMARY: Our prognostic model predicting 1-yr survival free from recurrence of bladder cancer after radical cystectomy, with or without standard chemotherapy, could provide an improvement to the quality of phase 2 clinical trial designs and interpretation of their results.
Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bladder cancer; Nomogram; Perioperative chemotherapy; Relapse-free survival; Urothelial carcinoma

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 31200838      PMCID: PMC7552889          DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol        ISSN: 2588-9311


  25 in total

Review 1.  Invasive bladder cancer: ESMO clinical recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Authors:  J Bellmunt; S Albiol; V Kataja
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Pathologic response in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Is therapeutic effect owing to chemotherapy or TURBT?

Authors:  Aaron Brant; Max Kates; Meera R Chappidi; Hiten D Patel; Nikolai A Sopko; George J Netto; Alex S Baras; Noah M Hahn; Phillip M Pierorazio; Trinity J Bivalacqua
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 3.  Systemic, perioperative management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer and future horizons.

Authors:  Samuel A Funt; Jonathan E Rosenberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Nomogram for predicting disease recurrence after radical cystectomy for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  Pierre I Karakiewicz; Shahrokh F Shariat; Ganesh S Palapattu; Amiel E Gilad; Yair Lotan; Craig G Rogers; Amnon Vazina; Amit Gupta; Patrick J Bastian; Paul Perrotte; Arthur I Sagalowsky; Mark Schoenberg; Seth P Lerner
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  P0 stage at radical cystectomy for bladder cancer is associated with improved outcome independent of traditional clinical risk factors.

Authors:  Wassim Kassouf; Philippe E Spiess; Gordon A Brown; Mark F Munsell; H Barton Grossman; Arlene Siefker-Radtke; Colin P N Dinney; Ashish M Kamat
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Postoperative nomogram predicting risk of recurrence after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Bernard H Bochner; Michael W Kattan; Kinjal C Vora
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Immediate versus deferred chemotherapy after radical cystectomy in patients with pT3-pT4 or N+ M0 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (EORTC 30994): an intergroup, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Cora N Sternberg; Iwona Skoneczna; J Martijn Kerst; Peter Albers; Sophie D Fossa; Mads Agerbaek; Herlinde Dumez; Maria de Santis; Christine Théodore; Michael G Leahy; John D Chester; Antony Verbaeys; Gedske Daugaard; Lori Wood; J Alfred Witjes; Ronald de Wit; Lionel Geoffrois; Lisa Sengelov; George Thalmann; Danielle Charpentier; Frédéric Rolland; Laurent Mignot; Santhanam Sundar; Paul Symonds; John Graham; Florence Joly; Sandrine Marreaud; Laurence Collette; Richard Sylvester
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 8.  Correlation of pathologic complete response with survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in bladder cancer treated with cystectomy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fausto Petrelli; Andrea Coinu; Mary Cabiddu; Mara Ghilardi; Ivano Vavassori; Sandro Barni
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Risk stratification of pT1-3N0 patients after radical cystectomy for adjuvant chemotherapy counselling.

Authors:  E Xylinas; E K Cha; M Sun; M Rink; Q-D Trinh; G Novara; D A Green; A Pycha; Y Fradet; S Daneshmand; R S Svatek; H-M Fritsche; W Kassouf; D S Scherr; T Faison; J J Crivelli; S T Tagawa; M Zerbib; P I Karakiewicz; S F Shariat
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Mutational patterns in chemotherapy resistant muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  David Liu; Philip Abbosh; Daniel Keliher; Brendan Reardon; Diana Miao; Kent Mouw; Amaro Weiner-Taylor; Stephanie Wankowicz; Garam Han; Min Yuen Teo; Catharine Cipolla; Jaegil Kim; Gopa Iyer; Hikmat Al-Ahmadie; Essel Dulaimi; David Y T Chen; R Katherine Alpaugh; Jean Hoffman-Censits; Levi A Garraway; Gad Getz; Scott L Carter; Joaquim Bellmunt; Elizabeth R Plimack; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Eliezer M Van Allen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  2 in total

1.  Incremental Utility of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Quantifying the Relapse Risk Associated with Therapeutic Effect.

Authors:  Filippo Pederzoli; Marco Bandini; Alberto Briganti; Elizabeth R Plimack; Günter Niegisch; Evan Y Yu; Aristotelis Bamias; Neeraj Agarwal; Srikala S Sridhar; Cora N Sternberg; Ulka N Vaishampayan; Christine Théodore; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Lauren C Harshman; Joaquim Bellmunt; Matthew D Galsky; Andrea Gallina; Andrea Salonia; Francesco Montorsi; Andrea Necchi
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 2.  The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy among patients undergoing radical cystectomy for variant histology bladder cancer: A systematic review.

Authors:  Mario Alvarez-Maestro; Francesco Chierigo; Guglielmo Mantica; J M Quesada-Olarte; D M Carrion; Juan Gomez-Rivas; Alvaro Pinto-Marin; Alfredo Aguilera Bazan; Luis Martinez-Piñeiro
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2021-11-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.