Albert Font1,2, Montserrat Domenech3, Oscar Buisan4, Hector Lopez5, Andrea González6, Olatz Etxaniz6,7, Marta Matas3, Xavier Elias4, Maica Gomez8, Mariona Figols3, Judith Horneros9, Juan Carlos Pardo6,7, Lucia Notario6,7, Vicenç Ruiz de Porras6,7, Ignacio Perez3, Joan Areal4, Anna Esteve6. 1. Medical Oncology Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, 08972, Barcelona, Spain. afont@iconcologia.net. 2. Badalona Applied Research Group in Oncology (B-ARGO), Institut Català d'Oncologia - Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain. afont@iconcologia.net. 3. Medical Oncology Department, Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa, Barcelona, Spain. 4. Urology Department, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain. 5. Urology Department, Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa, Barcelona, Spain. 6. Medical Oncology Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, 08972, Barcelona, Spain. 7. Badalona Applied Research Group in Oncology (B-ARGO), Institut Català d'Oncologia - Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain. 8. Pathology Department, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain. 9. Radiology Department, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To develop a risk score based on a prognostic model and a nomogram integrating baseline clinicopathological variables to predict bladder cancer-specific survival (BCSS) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients. METHODS: We retrospectively identified a consecutive sample of 247 MIBC patients treated with cisplatin-based NAC-plus-cystectomy in two Spanish hospitals between 2000 and 2019. Age at MIBC diagnosis, sex, histology, lymphovascular invasion, previous non-MIBC, hydronephrosis, and clinical TNM were included in the initial Cox regression model. A risk score was computed based on the final prognostic model and a nomogram was used to estimate BCSS at 2 and 5 years. RESULTS: Median age was 66 years; 89% were males; 83% had pure urothelial carcinoma; 16.2% had previous non-MIBC. Clinical stage was T2N0, T3-4aN0, and Tx-4N + in 24%, 57%, and 19% of patients, respectively. Complete pathological response was seen in 29.4% and downstaging to non-MIBC (ypT1, ypTa, ypTis) in 12.5% of patients. Overall 5-year BCSS was 59%. Four prognostic factors were identified: variant histology, previous non-MIBC, female sex and hydronephrosis. By adding the points attributed to each of these factors, we categorized patients in three groups: low-risk (0 points); intermediate-risk (1-9 points); high-risk (≥ 10 points). Five-year BCSS was 72%, 53%, and 15%, respectively (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: We developed a nomogram and risk score based on four baseline clinicopathological characteristics to predict BCSS to NAC-plus-cystectomy in MIBC patients. If validated in prospective studies, this nomogram can be useful for selecting patients likely to benefit from NAC.
PURPOSE: To develop a risk score based on a prognostic model and a nomogram integrating baseline clinicopathological variables to predict bladder cancer-specific survival (BCSS) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients. METHODS: We retrospectively identified a consecutive sample of 247 MIBC patients treated with cisplatin-based NAC-plus-cystectomy in two Spanish hospitals between 2000 and 2019. Age at MIBC diagnosis, sex, histology, lymphovascular invasion, previous non-MIBC, hydronephrosis, and clinical TNM were included in the initial Cox regression model. A risk score was computed based on the final prognostic model and a nomogram was used to estimate BCSS at 2 and 5 years. RESULTS: Median age was 66 years; 89% were males; 83% had pure urothelial carcinoma; 16.2% had previous non-MIBC. Clinical stage was T2N0, T3-4aN0, and Tx-4N + in 24%, 57%, and 19% of patients, respectively. Complete pathological response was seen in 29.4% and downstaging to non-MIBC (ypT1, ypTa, ypTis) in 12.5% of patients. Overall 5-year BCSS was 59%. Four prognostic factors were identified: variant histology, previous non-MIBC, female sex and hydronephrosis. By adding the points attributed to each of these factors, we categorized patients in three groups: low-risk (0 points); intermediate-risk (1-9 points); high-risk (≥ 10 points). Five-year BCSS was 72%, 53%, and 15%, respectively (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: We developed a nomogram and risk score based on four baseline clinicopathological characteristics to predict BCSS to NAC-plus-cystectomy in MIBC patients. If validated in prospective studies, this nomogram can be useful for selecting patients likely to benefit from NAC.
Authors: Ming Yin; Monika Joshi; Richard P Meijer; Michael Glantz; Sheldon Holder; Harold A Harvey; Matthew Kaag; Elisabeth E Fransen van de Putte; Simon Horenblas; Joseph J Drabick Journal: Oncologist Date: 2016-04-06
Authors: Nawar Hanna; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Thomas Seisen; Malte W Vetterlein; Jesse Sammon; Mark A Preston; Stuart R Lipsitz; Joaquim Bellmunt; Mani Menon; Toni K Choueiri; Firas Abdollah Journal: Eur Urol Oncol Date: 2018-05-15
Authors: Albert Font; Raquel Luque; José Carlos Villa; Montse Domenech; Sergio Vázquez; Enrique Gallardo; Juan Antonio Virizuela; Carmen Beato; Rafael Morales-Barrera; Antoni Gelabert; Sonia Maciá; Javier Puente; Gustavo Rubio; Xavier Maldonado; Begoña Perez-Valderrama; Alvaro Pinto; Ovidio Fernández Calvo; Enrique Grande; Javier Garde-Noguera; Eva Fernández-Parra; José Ángel Arranz Journal: Target Oncol Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 4.493
Authors: Bimal Bhindi; Igor Frank; Ross J Mason; Robert F Tarrell; Prabin Thapa; John C Cheville; Brian A Costello; Lance C Pagliaro; R Jeffrey Karnes; R Houston Thompson; Matthew K Tollefson; Stephen A Boorjian Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2017-05-22 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: A Font; M Taron; J L Gago; C Costa; J J Sánchez; C Carrato; M Mora; P Celiz; L Perez; D Rodríguez; A Gimenez-Capitan; V Quiroga; S Benlloch; L Ibarz; R Rosell Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2010-07-05 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Woonyoung Choi; Sima Porten; Seungchan Kim; Daniel Willis; Elizabeth R Plimack; Jean Hoffman-Censits; Beat Roth; Tiewei Cheng; Mai Tran; I-Ling Lee; Jonathan Melquist; Jolanta Bondaruk; Tadeusz Majewski; Shizhen Zhang; Shanna Pretzsch; Keith Baggerly; Arlene Siefker-Radtke; Bogdan Czerniak; Colin P N Dinney; David J McConkey Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2014-02-10 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Eliezer M Van Allen; Kent W Mouw; Philip Kim; Gopa Iyer; Nikhil Wagle; Hikmat Al-Ahmadie; Cong Zhu; Irina Ostrovnaya; Gregory V Kryukov; Kevin W O'Connor; John Sfakianos; Ilana Garcia-Grossman; Jaegil Kim; Elizabeth A Guancial; Richard Bambury; Samira Bahl; Namrata Gupta; Deborah Farlow; Angela Qu; Sabina Signoretti; Justine A Barletta; Victor Reuter; Jesse Boehm; Michael Lawrence; Gad Getz; Philip Kantoff; Bernard H Bochner; Toni K Choueiri; Dean F Bajorin; David B Solit; Stacey Gabriel; Alan D'Andrea; Levi A Garraway; Jonathan E Rosenberg Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2014-08-05 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Zachary D Reardon; Sanjay G Patel; Harras B Zaid; C J Stimson; Matthew J Resnick; Kirk A Keegan; Daniel A Barocas; Sam S Chang; Michael S Cookson Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2014-01-23 Impact factor: 20.096