| Literature DB >> 28545487 |
Alex P Carll1,2, Samir M Crespo3,4, Mauricio S Filho3,4, Douglas H Zati3,4, Brent A Coull3, Edgar A Diaz3, Rodrigo D Raimundo3,5, Thomas N G Jaeger3,4, Ana Laura Ricci-Vitor3,6, Vasileios Papapostolou3, Joy E Lawrence3, David M Garner7, Brigham S Perry3, Jack R Harkema8, John J Godleski3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies have linked exposures to ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and traffic with autonomic nervous system imbalance (ANS) and cardiac pathophysiology, especially in individuals with preexisting disease. It is unclear whether metabolic syndrome (MetS) increases susceptibility to the effects of PM2.5. We hypothesized that exposure to traffic-derived primary and secondary organic aerosols (P + SOA) at ambient levels would cause autonomic and cardiovascular dysfunction in rats exhibiting features of MetS. Male Sprague Dawley (SD) rats were fed a high-fructose diet (HFrD) to induce MetS, and exposed to P + SOA (20.4 ± 0.9 μg/m3) for 12 days with time-matched comparison to filtered-air (FA) exposed MetS rats; normal diet (ND) SD rats were separately exposed to FA or P + SOA (56.3 ± 1.2 μg/m3).Entities:
Keywords: Arrhythmia; Autonomic; Baroreflex; Cardiopulmonary; Heart rate variability; Particulate matter; Respiratory; Secondary organic aerosol; Traffic
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28545487 PMCID: PMC5445437 DOI: 10.1186/s12989-017-0196-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Part Fibre Toxicol ISSN: 1743-8977 Impact factor: 9.400
Baseline cardiovascular physiology in control-fed (n = 8) and MetS (n = 12) rats
| ND | MetS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 121 | ± 1.9 |
|
|
| Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 86.6 | ± 1.3 |
|
|
|
| 1487 | ± 49 |
|
|
| Heart Rate (beats/min) | 333.3 | ± 5.1 | 328.6 | ± 5.8 |
| BRS slope (ms/mmHg) | 1.81 | ± 0.28 | 1.65 | ± 0.23 |
| RMSSD (ms) | 4.1 | ± 0.34 | 5.05 | ± 0.68 |
| SDNN (ms) | 6.85 | ± 0.47 |
|
|
| HF (ms2)a | 1.37 | ± 0.22 | 2.55 | ± 0.73 |
| LF (ms2)a | 0.90 | ± 0.20 | 0.98 | ± 0.35 |
| LF/HF† | 0.64 | ± 0.05 | 0.50 | ± 0.06 |
Means ± SE from baseline FA exposure. aindicates values from ECG + BP telemetered ND rats under the same baseline monitoring and FA conditions (n = 14). * and *** indicate P < 0.05 and <0.001, respectively
Characteristics of P + SOA exposure
| Pollutant | ND | MetS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 Mass (μg/m3) | 56.3 | ± 1.2 | 20.4 | ± 0.9 |
| PM2.5 Count (thousand/cm3) | 9.0 | ± 0.2 | 6.6 | ± 0.2 |
| PM2.5 MMD (nm) | 297.0 | ± 6 | 262.7 | ± 2 |
| PM2.5 CMD (nm) | 135.0 | ± 2 | 95.2 | ± 2 |
| NO (ppb) | 1.0 | ± 0 | 3.2 | ± 1.2 |
| NOx (ppb) | 2.6 | ± 0.5 | 11.3 | ± 1 |
| O3 (ppb) | - | - | 22.7 | ± 2.1 |
| CO (ppm) | - | - | 1.0 | ±0 |
Means ± SE over entire 12-day exposure period. PM2.5 MMD and CMD denote mass and count median diameters ± geometric standard deviation. P + SOA exposure of ND rats applied the same parallel gas denuders as for MetS, but CO and O3 were not measured. FA was not monitored
Overall Effects of P + SOA exposure on ND and MetS rats
| ND | MetS | MetS vs. ND | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Diastolic Pressure (mmHg) | -0.45 | 0.874 | −0.532 | 0.830 | 0.1073 | |
| Systolic Pressure (mmHg) |
|
| −1.26 | 0.692 |
| |
| Aortic |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Pulse Pressure (mmHg) |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Rate × Pressure (BPM*mmHg/1000) | 0.098 | 0.927 | −0.860 | 0.654 |
| |
| Heart Rate (BPM) | 4.70 | 0.660 | −1.74 | 0.814 | 0.458 | |
| BRS (ms/mmHg) | 0.167 | 0.807 | −0.338 | 0.095 |
| |
| HRV | RMSSD (ms) | −0.023 | 0.946 |
|
| 0.076 |
| SDNN (ms) | −0.101 | 0.855 | −0.245 | 0.729 | 0.913 | |
| HF (ms2) | −0.921 | 0.068 | ||||
| LF (ms2) | 0.116 | 0.630 | ||||
| ECG | PR Interval (ms) |
|
| |||
| QTc Interval (ms) |
|
| ||||
Overall differences between diet-matched P + SOA- and FA-exposed groups in cardiovascular physiologic deltas from baseline or between opposing diets with exposure to P + SOA (right column, significance only). *indicates P < 0.05 by linear mixed model analysis
The italic font indicated significant differences
Fig. 1Daily time-domain HRV in ND and MetS rats. Values represent mean daily difference from diet-matched air-exposed group in change from baseline (±SE, n = 4–6/group) *—P < 0.05 vs. Air same diet. **—P < 0.05 vs. P + SOA other diet. Vertical lines indicate weekends
Fig. 2Hemodynamics in ND and MetS rats. Values represent mean daily difference from diet-matched air-exposed group in change from baseline (± SE, n = 4–6/group). *—P < 0.05 vs. Air same diet. **—P < 0.05 vs. P + SOA other diet. Vertical lines indicate weekends.
Relationship between HRV and blood pressure changes from baseline in ND and MetS rats
| Δ SBP | Δ DBP | Δ MBP | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| ND rats | Δ RMSSD | 0.05 | 0.63 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.11 | 0.31 |
| Δ SDNN | 0.04 | 0.71 | −0.08 | 0.48 | −0.01 | 0.94 | |
| MetS rats | Δ RMSSD | -0.06 | 0.51 | 0.00 | 0.99 | −0.02 | 0.83 |
| Δ SDNN | 0.05 | 0.58 | 0.10 | 0.23 | 0.07 | 0.39 |
Pearson correlation coefficients and P-values for linear regression between HRV delta and various aortic pressure deltas among all MetS and ND rats during exposure periods
Correlation between BRS and physiologic markers, PM2.5 concentrations, or gaseous components
| ND | MetS | |
|---|---|---|
| HR (beats/min) | 0.23* | -0.28** |
| RMSSD (ms) | 0.18 | 0.71*** |
| SDNN (ms) | 0.19 | 0.49*** |
| CV | 0.27** | 0.40*** |
| pNN15 | - | 0.59*** |
| HF (ms2) | - | 0.58*** |
| LF (ms2) | - | 0.71*** |
| LF/HF | - | -0.13 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 0.00 | -0.16 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 0.28** | −0.08 |
| PP (mmHg) | −0.49*** | −0.32*** |
|
| −0.41*** | −0.35*** |
| rate × P (BPM × mmHg) | −0.06 | -0.27** |
| PR (ms) | - | 0.27** |
| QTcB (ms) | - | 0.32*** |
| QTcF (ms) | - | 0.24** |
| QTe (ms) | - | −0.11 |
| S min. Slope (mV × ms) | - | 0.01 |
| ST amp (mV) | - | 0.13 |
| TpTe (ms) | - | 0.17* |
|
| - | -0.41*** |
|
| - | 0.07 |
|
| - | 0.36*** |
|
| - | 0.35*** |
| Pause (s) | - | 0.14 |
| PM2.5 mass (μg/m3) | −0.04 | -0.11 |
| PM2.5 count (#/m3) | −0.03 | −0.05 |
| NO (ppb) | 0.00 | −0.09 |
| NOx (ppb) | −0.01 | −0.12 |
| O3 (ppb) | - | 0.03 |
| CO (ppm) | - | −0.04 |
Pearson correlation coefficients for linear regression between BRS slope and various physiologic and exposure endpoints in MetS and ND-fed rats over the course of the entire exposure period, including both filtered air- and P + SOA-exposed animals. Pearson partial correlation was conducted for air pollutant concentrations. *, **, and *** indicate P < 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively. Dash alone indicates parameter was not analyzed
Fig. 3P + SOA exposure increased Atrioventricular Block Mobitz Type II arrhythmias in MetS rats on specific days relative to Air-control. Data are expressed as means ± SE (N = 6/group)
Fig. 4Daily change in ECG PR and QTc (Fridericia) interval from baseline in MetS rats during exposure to FA (Air) or P + SOA. Values represent group mean of daily change from individual rats’ values at baseline (±SE, n = 6/group). Vertical lines delineate exposure weeks. Asterisk denotes significant difference between time-matched group averages (P < 0.05)
Fig. 5Daily change from baseline in respiratory function in MetS rats during exposure to FA (Air) or P + SOA. Values represent group mean of daily change from individual rats’ values at baseline (±SE, n = 5–6/group). Vertical lines delineate exposure weeks. Asterisk denotes significant difference between time-matched group averages (P < 0.05)
Fig. 6Proposed relationship between cardiac physiology and acute particulate exposure based on susceptibility (e.g., hypertension, MetS, age, heart failure). With increasing concentration and/or exposure time, parasympathetic reflexes may counteract sympathetic dominance, dependent on antioxidant status, pulmonary clearance, vagal integrity, additional gaseous pollutants, and particulate interaction with irritant receptors