Literature DB >> 28543134

"Real life" longevity of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator devices.

Antonis S Manolis1, Themistoklis Maounis2, Spyridon Koulouris3, Vassilios Vassilikos4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Manufacturers of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) promise a 5- to 9-year projected longevity; however, real-life data indicate otherwise. The aim of the present study was to assess ICD longevity among 685 consecutive patients over the last 20 years. HYPOTHESIS: Real-life longevity of ICDs may differ from that stated by the manufacturers.
METHODS: The study included 601 men and 84 women (mean age, 63.1 ± 13.3 years). The underlying disease was coronary (n = 396) or valvular (n = 15) disease, cardiomyopathy (n = 220), or electrical disease (n = 54). The mean ejection fraction was 35%. Devices were implanted for secondary (n = 562) or primary (n = 123) prevention. Single- (n = 292) or dual-chamber (n = 269) or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices (n = 124) were implanted in the abdomen (n = 17) or chest (n = 668).
RESULTS: Over 20 years, ICD pulse generator replacements were performed in 238 patients (209 men; age 63.7 ± 13.9 years; ejection fraction, 37.7% ± 14.0%) who had an ICD for secondary (n = 210) or primary (n = 28) prevention. The mean ICD longevity was 58.3 ± 18.7 months. In 20 (8.4%) patients, devices exhibited premature battery depletion within 36 months. Most (94%) patients had none, minor, or modest use of ICD therapy. Longevity was longest for single-chamber devices and shortest for CRT devices. Latest-generation devices replaced over the second decade lasted longer compared with devices replaced during the first decade. When analyzed by manufacturer, Medtronic devices appeared to have longer longevity by 13 to 18 months.
CONCLUSIONS: ICDs continue to have limited longevity of 4.9 ± 1.6 years, and 8% demonstrate premature battery depletion by 3 years. CRT devices have the shortest longevity (mean, 3.8 years) by 13 to 17 months, compared with other ICD devices. These findings have important implications, particularly in view of the high expense involved with this type of electrical therapy.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Defibrillator Battery Depletion; Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator; Pulse Generator Replacement; Sudden Cardiac Death; Ventricular Fibrillation; Ventricular Tachycardia

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28543134      PMCID: PMC6490531          DOI: 10.1002/clc.22729

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cardiol        ISSN: 0160-9289            Impact factor:   2.882


  31 in total

1.  The growing mismatch between patient longevity and the service life of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

Authors:  Robert G Hauser
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-06-21       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Transvenous defibrillator systems implanted by electrophysiologists in the catheterization laboratory.

Authors:  A S Manolis; V Vassilikos; T Maounis; J Chiladakis; D V Cokkinos
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.882

3.  Significant differences in the expected versus observed longevity of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs).

Authors:  Tali Shafat; Yael Baumfeld; Victor Novack; Yuval Konstantino; Guy Amit
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2012-07-14       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 4.  Estimating the Risks and Benefits of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Generator Replacement: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Krystina B Lewis; Dawn Stacey; Sandra L Carroll; Laura Boland; Lindsey Sikora; David Birnie
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 5.  The cardiac implantable electronic device power source: evolution and revolution.

Authors:  Harry G Mond; Gary Freitag
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 1.976

6.  Electrophysiologist-implanted transvenous cardioverter defibrillators using local versus general anesthesia.

Authors:  A S Manolis; T Maounis; V Vassilikos; J Chiladakis; D V Cokkinos
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.976

7.  Prevention of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections: Single Operator Technique with Use of Povidone-Iodine, Double Gloving, Meticulous Aseptic/Antiseptic Measures and Antibiotic Prophylaxis.

Authors:  Antonis S Manolis; Helen Melita
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 1.976

8.  "Real life" longevity of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator devices.

Authors:  Antonis S Manolis; Themistoklis Maounis; Spyridon Koulouris; Vassilios Vassilikos
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 2.882

9.  The effect of duration of follow-up and presence of competing risk on lifespan-gain from implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy: who benefits the most?

Authors:  Claire E Raphael; Judith A Finegold; Anthony J Barron; Zachary I Whinnett; Jamil Mayet; Cecilia Linde; John G F Cleland; Wayne C Levy; Darrel P Francis
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  The economic impact of battery longevity in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for cardiac resynchronization therapy: the hospital and healthcare system perspectives.

Authors:  Maurizio Landolina; Giovanni Morani; Antonio Curnis; Antonello Vado; Antonio D'Onofrio; Valter Bianchi; Giuseppe Stabile; Martino Crosato; Barbara Petracci; Carlo Ceriotti; Luca Bontempi; Martina Morosato; Gian Paolo Ballari; Maurizio Gasparini
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 5.214

View more
  6 in total

1.  "Real life" longevity of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator devices.

Authors:  Antonis S Manolis; Themistoklis Maounis; Spyridon Koulouris; Vassilios Vassilikos
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 2.882

2.  How to get the optimal defibrillation lead parameters using myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Tariel A Atabekov; Roman E Batalov; Svetlana I Sazonova; Sergey N Krivolapov; Mikhail S Khlynin; Anna I Mishkina; Konstantin V Zavadovsky; Antonio Curnis; Sergey V Popov
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Cardiac implantable electronic device lead extraction using the lead-locking device system: keeping it simple, safe, and inexpensive with mechanical tools and local anesthesia.

Authors:  Antonis S Manolis; Georgios Georgiopoulos; Sofia Metaxa; Spyridon Koulouris; Dimitris Tsiachris
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 1.596

4.  Favorable Trend of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Service Life in a Large Single-Nation Population: Insights From 10-Year Analysis of the Italian Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Registry.

Authors:  Stefano Poli; Giuseppe Boriani; Massimo Zecchin; Domenico Facchin; Maurizio Gasparini; Maurizio Landolina; Renato Pietro Ricci; Corrado Lanera; Dario Gregori; Alessandro Proclemer
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 5.501

5.  An in-silico assessment of efficacy of two novel intra-cardiac electrode configurations versus traditional anti-tachycardia pacing therapy for terminating sustained ventricular tachycardia.

Authors:  Shuang Qian; Adam Connolly; Caroline Mendonca-Costa; Fernando Campos; Steven E Williams; John Whitaker; Christopher A Rinaldi; Martin J Bishop
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2021-10-30       Impact factor: 4.589

Review 6.  Remote Monitoring of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Permanent Pacemakers: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2018-10-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.