Ferenc B Sallo1,2, Irene Leung1, Traci E Clemons3, Tunde Peto4,5, Emily Y Chew6, Daniel Pauleikhoff7, Alan C Bird8. 1. Department of Research and Development, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom. 2. UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom. 3. The Emmes Corporation, Rockville, Maryland. 4. Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom. 5. NIHR Biomedical Research Center for Ophthalmology, Moorfields Eye Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom. 6. National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. 7. Department of Ophthalmology, St. Franziskus Hospital, Münster, Germany. 8. Department of Inherited Eye Disease, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Macular telangiectasia Type 2 is a bilateral, progressive, potentially blinding retinal disease characterized by both vascular and neurodegenerative signs. Both the area of the break in the ellipsoid zone seen in "en face" optical coherence tomographic (OCT) images and microperimetric focal retinal sensitivity loss have been proposed as potential measures of progression in macular telangiectasia. The authors aimed to assess the characteristics and interrelationship of these structural and functional disease markers from the data collected in a phase one clinical trial of ciliary neurotrophic factor in macular telangiectasia. METHODS: Orthogonal topographic (en face) maps of the ellipsoid zone were generated from Heidelberg Spectralis OCT volume scans (15 × 10° area, 30-μm B-scan intervals) or Zeiss Cirrus HD-OCT 4000 512 × 128 cube scans. Mesopic microperimetry was performed on CenterVue MAIA perimeters, using a Goldmann III stimulus in a custom test grid. Structural and functional data were analyzed by two methods: by calculating aggregate loss and by simple thresholding. The alignment quality of structural and functional data was also evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, the break area showed a good correlation with aggregate sensitivity loss (ρ = 0.834, P < 0.0001, 95% confidence interval 0.716-0.906) but also with the number of test points below a threshold value (e.g., <20 dB: ρ = 0.843, P < 0.0001, 95% confidence interval 0.755-0.902). Significant misalignment of the MAIA test grid was apparent in 13/48 visits of 7/14 eyes. CONCLUSION: The authors found a good correlation between ellipsoid zone break area and function loss. En face OCT mapping of the ellipsoid zone appears to demonstrate structural change before mesopic microperimetry can detect a focal loss of retinal sensitivity. Thresholding offers a quick alternative to calculating aggregate sensitivity loss.
PURPOSE: Macular telangiectasia Type 2 is a bilateral, progressive, potentially blinding retinal disease characterized by both vascular and neurodegenerative signs. Both the area of the break in the ellipsoid zone seen in "en face" optical coherence tomographic (OCT) images and microperimetric focal retinal sensitivity loss have been proposed as potential measures of progression in macular telangiectasia. The authors aimed to assess the characteristics and interrelationship of these structural and functional disease markers from the data collected in a phase one clinical trial of ciliary neurotrophic factor in macular telangiectasia. METHODS: Orthogonal topographic (en face) maps of the ellipsoid zone were generated from Heidelberg Spectralis OCT volume scans (15 × 10° area, 30-μm B-scan intervals) or Zeiss Cirrus HD-OCT 4000 512 × 128 cube scans. Mesopic microperimetry was performed on CenterVue MAIA perimeters, using a Goldmann III stimulus in a custom test grid. Structural and functional data were analyzed by two methods: by calculating aggregate loss and by simple thresholding. The alignment quality of structural and functional data was also evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, the break area showed a good correlation with aggregate sensitivity loss (ρ = 0.834, P < 0.0001, 95% confidence interval 0.716-0.906) but also with the number of test points below a threshold value (e.g., <20 dB: ρ = 0.843, P < 0.0001, 95% confidence interval 0.755-0.902). Significant misalignment of the MAIA test grid was apparent in 13/48 visits of 7/14 eyes. CONCLUSION: The authors found a good correlation between ellipsoid zone break area and function loss. En face OCT mapping of the ellipsoid zone appears to demonstrate structural change before mesopic microperimetry can detect a focal loss of retinal sensitivity. Thresholding offers a quick alternative to calculating aggregate sensitivity loss.
Authors: Anjali S Maheshwary; Stephen F Oster; Ritchie M S Yuson; Lingyun Cheng; Francesca Mojana; William R Freeman Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2010-05-10 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Emily Y Chew; Traci E Clemons; Tunde Peto; Ferenc B Sallo; Avner Ingerman; Weng Tao; Lawrence Singerman; Steven D Schwartz; Neal S Peachey; Alan C Bird Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2014-12-19 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Nalini V Rangaswamy; Hemaxi M Patel; Kirsten G Locke; Donald C Hood; David G Birch Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2010-03-10 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Ferenc B Sallo; Tunde Peto; Catherine Egan; Ute E K Wolf-Schnurrbusch; Traci E Clemons; Mark C Gillies; Daniel Pauleikhoff; Gary S Rubin; Emily Y Chew; Alan C Bird Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2012-11-29 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Gildo Y Fujii; Eugene de Juan; Janet Sunness; Mark S Humayun; Dante J Pieramici; Tom S Chang Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Tjebo F C Heeren; Diána Kitka; Daniela Florea; Traci E Clemons; Emily Y Chew; Alan C Bird; Daniel Pauleikhoff; Peter Charbel Issa; Frank G Holz; Tunde Peto Journal: Retina Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 4.256