Literature DB >> 19540168

Prospective study of iliac crest bone graft harvest site pain and morbidity.

David H Kim1, Richard Rhim, Ling Li, Juli Martha, Bryan H Swaim, Robert J Banco, Louis G Jenis, Scott G Tromanhauser.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Morbidity associated with autologous bone graft harvest is an important factor in determining the utility of expensive alternatives such as recombinant bone morphogenic protein. The most frequently reported complication associated with graft harvest is chronic pain.
PURPOSE: To prospectively determine the degree of pain and morbidity associated with autologous iliac crest bone graft harvest and its effect on activities of daily living. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: One hundred ten adult patients undergoing elective posterior lumbar spinal fusion surgery involving autologous iliac crest bone graft harvest. OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient self-reported Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores for pain and a study-specific questionnaire regarding activities of daily living.
METHODS: One hundred ten patients were prospectively enrolled. Postoperative VAS scores (0-100) for harvest site pain were obtained at 6-week, 6- and 12-month follow-up. Patients completed a 12-month questionnaire regarding the persistence of specific symptoms and resulting limitation of specific activities.
RESULTS: One hundred four patients were available for 1-year follow-up. Mean VAS pain scores (scale 0-100) at 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months were 22.7 (standard deviation [SD], 25.9), 15.9 (SD, 21.5), and 16.1 (SD, 24.6), respectively. At 12 months, 16.5% reported more severe pain from the harvest site than the primary surgical site, 29.1% reported numbness, and 11.3% found the degree of numbness bothersome, whereas 3.9% were bothered by scar appearance. With respect to activity limitations resulting from harvest site pain at 1 year, 15.1% reported some difficulty walking, 5.2% with employment, 12.9% with recreation, 14.1% with household chores, 7.6% with sexual activity, and 5.9% irritation from clothing.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant rate of persistent pain and morbidity from iliac crest bone graft harvest when associated with elective spine surgery. Mean pain scores progressively decline over the first postoperative year. Nevertheless, harvest site pain remains functionally limiting in a significant percentage of patients 1 year after surgery. Rates of functional limitation are higher than previously reported and may be because of increased sensitivity of the prospective study design and targeted investigation of these specific symptoms. Validity of these findings is necessarily limited by patient ability to discriminate harvest site pain from alternative sources of back and buttock pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19540168     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  65 in total

Review 1.  Strategies for controlled delivery of growth factors and cells for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Tiffany N Vo; F Kurtis Kasper; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 2.  Current status of bone graft options for anterior interbody fusion of the cervical and lumbar spine.

Authors:  Anthony Minh Tien Chau; Lileane Liang Xu; Johnny Ho-Yin Wong; Ralph Jasper Mobbs
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Mesenchymal stem cells derived from vertebrae (vMSCs) show best biological properties.

Authors:  Giovanni Barbanti Brodano; Silvia Terzi; Luisa Trombi; Cristiana Griffoni; Mauro Valtieri; Stefano Boriani; Maria Cristina Magli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Anatomic feasibility of a new endopelvic approach for iliac crest bone harvesting.

Authors:  S Le Pape; L Du Pouget; T Cloche; M Campana; I Obeid; L Boissiere; J-M Vital
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Cell therapy of pseudarthrosis.

Authors:  Ricardo Bastos Filho; Simone Lermontov; Radovan Borojevic; Paulo Cezar Schott; Vinicius Schott Gameiro; José Mauro Granjeiro
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 0.513

Review 6.  Autologous bone graft harvesting: a review of grafts and surgical techniques.

Authors:  A M Jakoi; J A Iorio; P J Cahill
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2015-04-07

7.  Iliac crest bone grafting: raising awareness of a common pitfall.

Authors:  Denosshan Sri; Jonathan Compson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Comparison of the use of rhBMP-7 versus iliac crest autograft in single-level lumbar fusion: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Fubiao Ye; Zhiyuan Zeng; Jianru Wang; Hui Liu; Hua Wang; Zhaomin Zheng
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  A radiographic and clinical comparison of reamer-irrigator-aspirator versus iliac crest bone graft in ankle arthrodesis.

Authors:  Scott R Nodzo; Nathan B Kaplan; Donald W Hohman; Christopher A Ritter
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  In vitro and in vivo evaluation of self-mineralization and biocompatibility of injectable, dual-gelling hydrogels for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Tiffany N Vo; Adam K Ekenseair; Patrick P Spicer; Brendan M Watson; Stephanie N Tzouanas; Terrence T Roh; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 9.776

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.