Literature DB >> 28540325

Gender Differences in the Formation of a Field of Study Choice Set.

Sigal Alon1, Thomas A DiPrete2.   

Abstract

Women now surpass men in overall rates of college graduation in many industrialized countries, but sex segregation in fields of study persists. In a world where gender norms have changed but gender stereotypes remain strong, we argue that men's and women's attitudes and orientations toward fields of study in college are less constrained by gendered institutions than is the ranking of these fields. Accordingly, the sex segregation in the broader choice set of majors considered by college applicants may be lower than the sex segregation in their first preference field of study selection. With unique data on the broader set of fields considered by applicants to elite Israeli universities, we find support for this theory. The factors that drive the gender gap in the choice of field of study, in particular labor market earnings, risk aversion, and the sex composition of fields, are weaker in the broad set of choices than in the first choice. The result is less segregation in considered majors than in the first choice and, more broadly, different gender patterns in the decision process for the set of considered majors and for the first choice. We consider the theoretical implications of these results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  choice model; field of study; gender; higher education; sex segregation

Year:  2015        PMID: 28540325      PMCID: PMC5439975          DOI: 10.15195/v2.a5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sociol Sci        ISSN: 2330-6696


  9 in total

1.  Indulging our gendered selves? Sex segregation by field of study in 44 countries.

Authors:  Maria Charles; Karen Bradley
Journal:  AJS       Date:  2009-01

2.  A threat in the air. How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance.

Authors:  C M Steele
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1997-06

3.  Trends in occupational segregation by gender 1970-2009: adjusting for the impact of changes in the occupational coding system.

Authors:  Francine D Blau; Peter Brummund; Albert Yung-Hsu Liu
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2013-04

4.  The High School Environment and the Gender Gap in Science and Engineering.

Authors:  Joscha Legewie; Thomas A DiPrete
Journal:  Sociol Educ       Date:  2014-09-22

5.  Sex differences and similarities in job attribute preferences: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  A M Konrad; J E Ritchie; P Lieb; E Corrigall
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans.

Authors:  C M Steele; J Aronson
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1995-11

7.  Trends in gender segregation in the choice of science and engineering majors.

Authors:  Allison Mann; Thomas A Diprete
Journal:  Soc Sci Res       Date:  2013-07-15

8.  Feeding the pipeline: Gender, occupational plans, and college major selection.

Authors:  Stephen L Morgan; Dafna Gelbgiser; Kim A Weeden
Journal:  Soc Sci Res       Date:  2013-04-08

9.  Penalties for success: reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks.

Authors:  Madeline E Heilman; Aaron S Wallen; Daniella Fuchs; Melinda M Tamkins
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2004-06
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.