Literature DB >> 27857451

The High School Environment and the Gender Gap in Science and Engineering.

Joscha Legewie1, Thomas A DiPrete2.   

Abstract

Despite the striking reversal of the gender gap in education, women pursue science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) degrees at much lower rates than those of their male peers. This study extends existing explanations for these gender differences and examines the role of the high school context for plans to major in STEM fields. Building on recent gender theories, we argue that widely shared and hegemonic gender beliefs manifest differently across schools so that the gender-specific formation of study plans is shaped by the local environment of high schools. Using the National Education Longitudinal Study, we first show large variations between high schools in the ability to attract students to STEM fields conditional on a large set of pre-high school measures. Schools that are successful in attracting students to these fields reduce the gender gap by 25 percent or more. As a first step toward understanding what matters about schools, we then estimate the effect of two concrete high school characteristics on plans to major in STEM fields in college-a high school's curriculum in STEM and gender segregation of extracurricular activities. These factors have a substantial effect on the gender gap in plans to major in STEM: a finding that is reaffirmed in a number of sensitivity analyses. Our focus on the high school context opens concrete avenues for policy intervention and is of central theoretical importance to understand the gender gap in orientations toward STEM fields.

Entities:  

Keywords:  STEM fields; extracurricular activities; gender gap; high school context; school curriculum

Year:  2014        PMID: 27857451      PMCID: PMC5110218          DOI: 10.1177/0038040714547770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sociol Educ        ISSN: 0038-0407


  13 in total

1.  Career choice. Planning early for careers in science.

Authors:  Robert H Tai; Christine Qi Liu; Adam V Maltese; Xitao Fan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Diversity. Gender similarities characterize math performance.

Authors:  Janet S Hyde; Sara M Lindberg; Marcia C Linn; Amy B Ellis; Caroline C Williams
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Consistencies in sex differences on the Cognitive Abilities Test across countries, grades, test forms, and cohorts.

Authors:  David F Lohman; Joni M Lakin
Journal:  Br J Educ Psychol       Date:  2008-09-25

4.  Models for Value-Added Modeling of Teacher Effects.

Authors:  Daniel F McCaffrey; J R Lockwood; Daniel Koretz; Thomas A Louis; Laura Hamilton
Journal:  J Educ Behav Stat       Date:  2004

5.  Indulging our gendered selves? Sex segregation by field of study in 44 countries.

Authors:  Maria Charles; Karen Bradley
Journal:  AJS       Date:  2009-01

6.  Sex differences and similarities in job attribute preferences: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  A M Konrad; J E Ritchie; P Lieb; E Corrigall
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals.

Authors:  L V Hedges; A Nowell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-07-07       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Causal effects of single-sex schools on college entrance exams and college attendance: random assignment in Seoul high schools.

Authors:  Hyunjoon Park; Jere R Behrman; Jaesung Choi
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2013-04

9.  Feeding the pipeline: Gender, occupational plans, and college major selection.

Authors:  Stephen L Morgan; Dafna Gelbgiser; Kim A Weeden
Journal:  Soc Sci Res       Date:  2013-04-08

10.  Pathways to Science and Engineering Bachelor's Degrees for Men and Women.

Authors:  Joscha Legewie; Thomas A DiPrete
Journal:  Sociol Sci       Date:  2014-02-18
View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Gender in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Issues, Causes, Solutions.

Authors:  Tessa E S Charlesworth; Mahzarin R Banaji
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The conundrum of social class: Disparities in publishing among STEM students in undergraduate research programs at a Hispanic majority institution.

Authors:  Sara Grineski; Heather Daniels; Timothy Collins; Danielle X Morales; Angela Frederick; Marilyn Garcia
Journal:  Sci Educ       Date:  2017-12-10

3.  The potential scientist's dilemma: How the Masculinization of Science Shapes Friendships and Science Job Preferences.

Authors:  G Robin Gauthier; Patricia Wonch Hill; Julia McQuillan; Amy N Spiegel; Judy Diamond
Journal:  Soc Sci (Basel)       Date:  2017-02-14

4.  Preparing for Local Labor: Curricular Stratification across Local Economies in the United States.

Authors:  April Sutton
Journal:  Sociol Educ       Date:  2017-04-03

5.  Gender Differences in the Formation of a Field of Study Choice Set.

Authors:  Sigal Alon; Thomas A DiPrete
Journal:  Sociol Sci       Date:  2015-02-18

6.  Using social media advertisement data to monitor the gender gap in STEM: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Reham Al Tamime; Ingmar Weber
Journal:  PeerJ Comput Sci       Date:  2022-06-21

7.  Believing and Achieving: Gendered Pathways Toward Upward Educational Mobility in the United States.

Authors:  Mark Lee; Jeylan T Mortimer
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2020-06-06

8.  Suspended in context: School discipline, STEM course taking, and school racial/ethnic composition.

Authors:  Matthew Snidal
Journal:  Soc Sci Res       Date:  2020-11-13

9.  Checking Equity: Why Differential Item Functioning Analysis Should Be a Routine Part of Developing Conceptual Assessments.

Authors:  Patrícia Martinková; Adéla Drabinová; Yuan-Ling Liaw; Elizabeth A Sanders; Jenny L McFarland; Rebecca M Price
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Children's Gender Stereotypes in STEM Following a One-Shot Growth Mindset Intervention in a Science Museum.

Authors:  Fidelia Law; Luke McGuire; Mark Winterbottom; Adam Rutland
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-05-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.