Literature DB >> 15161402

Penalties for success: reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks.

Madeline E Heilman1, Aaron S Wallen, Daniella Fuchs, Melinda M Tamkins.   

Abstract

A total of 242 subjects participated in 3 experimental studies investigating reactions to a woman's success in a male gender-typed job. Results strongly supported the authors' hypotheses, indicating that (a) when women are acknowledged to have been successful, they are less liked and more personally derogated than equivalently successful men (Studies 1 and 2); (b) these negative reactions occur only when the success is in an arena that is distinctly male in character (Study 2); and (c) being disliked can have career-affecting outcomes, both for overall evaluation and for recommendations concerning organizational reward allocation (Study 3). These results were taken to support the idea that gender stereotypes can prompt bias in evaluative judgments of women even when these women have proved themselves to be successful and demonstrated their competence. The distinction between prescriptive and descriptive aspects of gender stereotypes is considered, as well as the implications of prescriptive gender norms for women in work settings. (c) 2004 APA

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15161402     DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9010


  46 in total

1.  Searching for excellence & diversity: increasing the hiring of women faculty at one academic medical center.

Authors:  Jennifer T Sheridan; Eve Fine; Christine Maidl Pribbenow; Jo Handelsman; Molly Carnes
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Aptitude or attitude? Lawrence Summers' recent remarks reflect what little progress has been made in the public's understanding why women are under-represented in science.

Authors:  Gerlind Wallon
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  Comparison of Male vs Female Resident Milestone Evaluations by Faculty During Emergency Medicine Residency Training.

Authors:  Arjun Dayal; Daniel M O'Connor; Usama Qadri; Vineet M Arora
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  Women chairs in academic medicine: engendering strategic intuition.

Authors:  Carol Isaac; Lindsay Griffin
Journal:  J Health Organ Manag       Date:  2015

Review 5.  Gender Bias in Resident Assessment in Graduate Medical Education: Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Robin Klein; Katherine A Julian; Erin D Snyder; Jennifer Koch; Nneka N Ufere; Anna Volerman; Ann E Vandenberg; Sarah Schaeffer; Kerri Palamara
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Does stereotype threat affect women in academic medicine?

Authors:  Diana Jill Burgess; Anne Joseph; Michelle van Ryn; Molly Carnes
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 6.893

7.  Why Some Humanoid Faces Are Perceived More Positively Than Others: Effects of Human-Likeness and Task.

Authors:  Akanksha Prakash; Wendy A Rogers
Journal:  Int J Soc Robot       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 5.126

8.  Impacting sexism through social justice prevention: implications at the person and environmental levels.

Authors:  Jonathan P Schwartz; Lori D Lindley
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2008-12-03

9.  Understanding long-term sick leave in female white-collar workers with burnout and stress-related diagnoses: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Hélène Sandmark; Monica Renstig
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Internal medicine residents' perceived ability to direct patient care: impact of gender and experience.

Authors:  Christie Bartels; Sarah Goetz; Earlise Ward; Molly Carnes
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.681

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.