Literature DB >> 28538950

Association of Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Survival in Patients With Stage II or III Gastric Cancer.

Yuming Jiang1, Tuanjie Li1, Xiaoling Liang2, Yanfeng Hu3, Lei Huang4, Zhenchen Liao5, Liying Zhao3, Zhen Han3, Shuguang Zhu6, Menglan Wang7, Yangwei Xu8, Xiaolong Qi3, Hao Liu3, Yang Yang6, Jiang Yu3, Wei Liu6, Shirong Cai9, Guoxin Li3.   

Abstract

Importance: The current staging system of gastric cancer is not adequate for defining a prognosis and predicting the patients most likely to benefit from chemotherapy. Objective: To construct a survival prediction model based on specific tumor and patient characteristics that enables individualized predictions of the net survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage II or stage III gastric cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this multicenter retrospective analysis, a survival prediction model was constructed using data from a training cohort of 746 patients with stage II or stage III gastric cancer who satisfied the study's inclusion criteria and underwent surgery between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2012, at Nanfang Hospital in Guangzhou, China. Patient and tumor characteristics were included as covariates, and their association with overall survival and disease-free survival with and without adjuvant chemotherapy was assessed. The model was internally validated for discrimination and calibration using bootstrap resampling. To externally validate the model, data were included from a validation cohort of 973 patients with stage II or stage III gastric cancer who met the inclusion criteria and underwent surgery at First Affiliated Hospital in Guangzhou, China, and at West China Hospital of Sichuan Hospital in Chendu, China, between January 1, 2000, and June 30, 2009. Data were analyzed from July 10, 2016, to September 1, 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures: Concordance index and decision curve analysis for each measure associated with postoperative overall survival and disease-free survival.
Results: Of the 1719 patients analyzed, 1183 (68.8%) were men and 536 (31.2%) were women and the median (interquartile range) age was 57 (49-66) years. Age, location, differentiation, carcinoembryonic antigen, cancer antigen 19-9, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, and adjuvant chemotherapy were significantly associated with overall survival and disease-free survival, with P < .05. The survival prediction model demonstrated good calibration and discrimination, with relatively high bootstrap-corrected concordance indexes in the training and validation cohorts. In the validation cohort, the concordance index for overall survival was 0.693 (95% CI, 0.671-0.715) and for disease-free survival was 0.704 (95% CI, 0.681-0.728). Two nomograms and a calculating tool were built on the basis of specific input variables to estimate an individual's net survival gain attributable to adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusions and Relevance: The survival prediction model can be used to make individualized predictions of the expected survival benefit from the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage II or stage III gastric cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28538950      PMCID: PMC5831463          DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.1087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Surg        ISSN: 2168-6254            Impact factor:   14.766


  36 in total

1.  Beyond the usual prediction accuracy metrics: reporting results for clinical decision making.

Authors:  A Russell Localio; Steven Goodman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  External validation of nomogram for the prediction of recurrence after curative resection in early gastric cancer.

Authors:  J H Kim; H S Kim; W Y Seo; C M Nam; K Y Kim; H C Jeung; J F Lai; H C Chung; S H Noh; S Y Rha
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 3.  Clinical implications of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibition.

Authors:  R B Diasio
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.990

4.  Postoperative nomogram for disease-specific survival after an R0 resection for gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Michael W Kattan; Martin S Karpeh; Madhu Mazumdar; Murray F Brennan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Randomized controlled trial of adjuvant uracil-tegafur versus surgery alone for serosa-negative, locally advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  T Nakajima; T Kinoshita; A Nashimoto; M Sairenji; T Yamaguchi; J Sakamoto; T Fujiya; T Inada; M Sasako; Y Ohashi
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Predicting the outcome of salvage radiation therapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Andrew J Stephenson; Peter T Scardino; Michael W Kattan; Thomas M Pisansky; Kevin M Slawin; Eric A Klein; Mitchell S Anscher; Jeff M Michalski; Howard M Sandler; Daniel W Lin; Jeffrey D Forman; Michael J Zelefsky; Larry L Kestin; Claus G Roehrborn; Charles N Catton; Theodore L DeWeese; Stanley L Liauw; Richard K Valicenti; Deborah A Kuban; Alan Pollack
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-05-20       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Prognostic index score and clinical prediction model of local regional recurrence after mastectomy in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Skye Hongiun Cheng; Cheng-Fang Horng; Jennifer L Clarke; Mei-Hua Tsou; Stella Y Tsai; Chii-Ming Chen; James J Jian; Mei-Chin Liu; Mike West; Andrew T Huang; Leonard R Prosnitz
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Development and external validation of a nomogram for overall survival after curative resection in serosa-negative, locally advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  S Hirabayashi; S Kosugi; Y Isobe; A Nashimoto; I Oda; K Hayashi; I Miyashiro; S Tsujitani; Y Kodera; Y Seto; H Furukawa; H Ono; S Tanabe; M Kaminishi; S Nunobe; T Fukagawa; R Matsuo; T Nagai; H Katai; T Wakai; K Akazawa
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 9.  Carcinoembryonic antigen in staging and follow-up of patients with solid tumors.

Authors:  A M Ballesta; R Molina; X Filella; J Jo; N Giménez
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  1995

10.  Extensions to decision curve analysis, a novel method for evaluating diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Angel M Cronin; Elena B Elkin; Mithat Gonen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 2.796

View more
  31 in total

1.  Noninvasive imaging of the tumor immune microenvironment correlates with response to immunotherapy in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Weicai Huang; Yuming Jiang; Wenjun Xiong; Zepang Sun; Chuanli Chen; Qingyu Yuan; Kangneng Zhou; Zhen Han; Hao Feng; Hao Chen; Xiaokun Liang; Shitong Yu; Yanfeng Hu; Jiang Yu; Yan Chen; Liying Zhao; Hao Liu; Zhiwei Zhou; Wei Wang; Wei Wang; Yikai Xu; Guoxin Li
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 17.694

2.  ARPP-19 Mediates Herceptin Resistance via Regulation of CD44 in Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Xiang Gao; Changwen Lu; Changyu Chen; Kang Sun; Qixin Liang; Jianfeng Shuai; Xiaoming Wang; Yuxing Xu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Video is better: why aren't we using it? A mixed-methods study of the barriers to routine procedural video recording and case review.

Authors:  Laura Mazer; Oliver Varban; John R Montgomery; Michael M Awad; Allison Schulman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  A Prognostic Nomogram and Heat Map to Predict Survival in Stage II/III Gastric Cancer Patients After Curative Gastrectomy Followed by Adjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Litong Shi; Zehua Wang; Lei Wang; Yongxu Jia; Jing Li; Yanru Qin
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 3.989

5.  Comparison of treatment strategies and survival of early-onset gastric cancer: a population-based study.

Authors:  Chunmei Zhang; Ruiyi Tang; Hanlong Zhu; Xianxiu Ge; Yue Wang; Xue Wang; Lin Miao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  The HER4-YAP1 axis promotes trastuzumab resistance in HER2-positive gastric cancer by inducing epithelial and mesenchymal transition.

Authors:  Jiaolong Shi; Fengping Li; Xingxing Yao; Tingyu Mou; Zhijun Xu; Zheng Han; Siyu Chen; Wende Li; Jiang Yu; Xiaolong Qi; Hao Liu; Guoxin Li
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 9.867

7.  Radiomic signature of 18F fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT for prediction of gastric cancer survival and chemotherapeutic benefits.

Authors:  Yuming Jiang; Qingyu Yuan; Wenbing Lv; Sujuan Xi; Weicai Huang; Zepang Sun; Hao Chen; Liying Zhao; Wei Liu; Yanfeng Hu; Lijun Lu; Jianhua Ma; Tuanjie Li; Jiang Yu; Quanshi Wang; Guoxin Li
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 11.556

8.  Prognostic significance of nomograms integrating IL-37 expression, neutrophil level, and MMR status in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Bing Zhu; Jie Luo; Yiyao Jiang; Luhua Yu; Mulin Liu; Jun Fu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 4.452

9.  Microsatellite instability and Epstein-Barr virus combined with PD-L1 could serve as a potential strategy for predicting the prognosis and efficacy of postoperative chemotherapy in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Na Yang; Yanhua Wu; Meishan Jin; Zhifang Jia; Yueqi Wang; Donghui Cao; Lili Qin; Xueying Wang; Min Zheng; Xueyuan Cao; Jing Jiang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Identification of an EMT-Related Gene Signature for Predicting Overall Survival in Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Weiyu Dai; Yizhi Xiao; Weimei Tang; Jiaying Li; Linjie Hong; Jieming Zhang; Miaomiao Pei; Jianjiao Lin; Side Liu; Xiaosheng Wu; Li Xiang; Jide Wang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.