| Literature DB >> 28534700 |
Cheng Zhao1, Wenbin Jiang1, Yuxiu Gao1, Weidong Niu1, Xiaojuan Zhang1, Lei Xin1.
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to investigate the risk factors and clinical value of lymph node metastasis (LNM) and missed central lymph node metastasis (CLNM) using preoperative ultrasound (US) in patients with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC). Methods This retrospective study included 521 patients who underwent thyroidectomy for confirmed PTMC based on a final histological examination between January 2014 and June 2015. Based on the presence of LNM, 521 cases were divided into two groups: metastasis (218) and non-metastasis (303). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to analyse the US and clinical characteristics of the primary tumour. Results We defined LNM based on the tumour diameter with an optimal critical value of 0.55 cm using ROC analysis with a sensitivity of 65.6% and specificity of 59.6%. We defined US-missed CLNM based on the optimal critical value of 0.65 cm using diagnostic ROC analysis with a sensitivity of 66.0% and specificity of 73.0%. The odds ratios of significant factors with LNM by US were 10.3 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 6.2-17.0), 5.3 (95% CI, 3.3-8.7), 2.7 (95% CI, 1.1-6.5), 4.3 (95% CI, 1.7-10.5), 2.5 (95% CI, 1.5-4.1), and 2.7 (95% CI, 1.7-4.4) for extrathyroidal invasion, blood flow, multifocality, tumour diameter greater than 0.55 cm, male sex, and age younger than 47 years, respectively. Conclusions US characteristics, such as extrathyroidal invasion, blood flow, tumour diameter, sex, and age, may improve the efficacy of predicting LNM and facilitating diagnosis of PTMC. Furthermore, tumour invasion to the extracapsular thyroid and a diameter greater than 0.65 cm indicate CLNM.Entities:
Keywords: Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma; central lymph node metastasis; lymph node metastasis; ultrasound
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28534700 PMCID: PMC5536411 DOI: 10.1177/0300060517708943
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int Med Res ISSN: 0300-0605 Impact factor: 1.671
Figure 1.Receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis for lymph node metastasis (LNM)
An index point ≥ 2 was found to be the optimal point to distinguish between PTMC with and without LNM. The sensitivity and specificity were 65.6% and 59.6%, respectively, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.655
Figure 2.Receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis for cervical lymph node metastasis (CLNM) missed by US
An index point ≥ 2 was found to be the optimal point to distinguish between PTMC with and without CLNM. The sensitivity and specificity were 66.0% and 73.0%, respectively, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.770.
Univariate and multivariate analyses of LNM and ultrasonographic and clinical characteristics of patients with PTMC.
| LNM | Univariate analysis | Multivariate logistic regression analysis | 95% Confidence interval | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound and clinical characteristics | Points | Total (n = 521) | (+) | (−) | χ2 | Odds ratio | Lower | Upper | ||
| Primary tumour microcalcification | ||||||||||
| Present | 1 | 443 | 152 | 291 | 68.97 | 0.000 | 0.122 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 2.4 |
| Absent | 0 | 78 | 66 | 12 | ||||||
| Extrathyroidal Invasion | ||||||||||
| Present | 1 | 387 | 124 | 263 | 59.34 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 10.3 | 6.2 | 17.0 |
| Absent | 0 | 134 | 94 | 40 | ||||||
| Defined | ||||||||||
| Well-defined | 1 | 19 | 8 | 11 | 5.59 × 10−4 | 1 | ||||
| Ill-defined | 0 | 502 | 210 | 292 | ||||||
| Shape | ||||||||||
| Irregular | 1 | 447 | 206 | 241 | 23.28 | 0.000 | 0.139 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 1.2 |
| Regular | 0 | 74 | 12 | 62 | ||||||
| Blood flow | ||||||||||
| Absent | 1 | 212 | 111 | 101 | 16.24 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 5.3 | 3.3 | 8.7 |
| Present | 0 | 309 | 107 | 202 | ||||||
| Coexisting lymphocytic thyroiditis | ||||||||||
| Present | 1 | 67 | 24 | 43 | 1.15 | 0.750 | ||||
| Absent | 0 | 454 | 194 | 260 | ||||||
| Coexisting nodular goiter | ||||||||||
| Present | 1 | 264 | 93 | 171 | 9.62 | 0.000 | 0.978 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| Absent | 0 | 257 | 125 | 132 | ||||||
| Composition | ||||||||||
| Cystic and solid mixed | 1 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 9.0 × 10−4 | 1 | ||||
| Solid | 0 | 517 | 217 | 300 | ||||||
| Multifocality | ||||||||||
| Present | 1 | 46 | 28 | 18 | 7.5 | 0.006 | 0.019 | 2.8 | 1.1 | 6.5 |
| Absent | 0 | 475 | 190 | 285 | ||||||
| Age (y) | ||||||||||
| <47 | 1 | 218 | 60 | 158 | 31.59 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| >47 | 0 | 303 | 158 | 145 | ||||||
| Sex | ||||||||||
| Female | 1 | 381 | 134 | 247 | 25.9 | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Male | 0 | 140 | 84 | 56 | ||||||
| Tumour size | ||||||||||
| >0.55 | 1 | 422 | 131 | 145 | 16.94 | 0.000 | 0.002 | 4.3 | 1.7 | 10.5 |
| <0.55 | 0 | 89 | 87 | 158 | ||||||
Univariate and multivariate analyses of missed CLNM by US and US and clinical characteristics of patients with PTMC.
| Central LNM | Univariate analysis | Multivariate logistic regression analysis | 95% Confidence interval | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound and clinical characteristics | Points | Total (n = 197) | (+) | (−) | χ2 | Odds ratio | Lower | Upper | ||
| Primary tumour microcalcification | ||||||||||
| Present | 1 | 132 | 41 | 91 | 9.7 | 0.000 | 0.163 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 5.4 |
| Absent | 0 | 65 | 7 | 58 | ||||||
| Extrathyroidal invasion | ||||||||||
| Present | 1 | 53 | 27 | 26 | 27.7 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 9.6 | 4.3 | 21.6 |
| Absent | 0 | 144 | 21 | 123 | ||||||
| Defined | ||||||||||
| Well-defined | 1 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 1.8 × 10−3 | 1 | ||||
| Ill-defined | 0 | 189 | 46 | 143 | ||||||
| Shape | ||||||||||
| Irregular | 1 | 162 | 39 | 123 | 0.04 | 1 | ||||
| Regular | 0 | 35 | 9 | 26 | ||||||
| Blood flow | ||||||||||
| Absent | 1 | 116 | 24 | 92 | 2.07 | 1 | ||||
| Present | 0 | 81 | 24 | 57 | ||||||
| Coexisting lymphocytic thyroiditis | ||||||||||
| Present | 1 | 25 | 5 | 20 | 0.29 | 1 | ||||
| Absent | 0 | 172 | 43 | 129 | ||||||
| Coexisting nodular goiter | ||||||||||
| Present | 1 | 88 | 23 | 65 | 2.62 | 1 | ||||
| Absent | 0 | 109 | 25 | 84 | ||||||
| Composition | ||||||||||
| Cystic and solid mixed | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3.1 | 1 | ||||
| Solid | 0 | 196 | 47 | 149 | ||||||
| Multifocality | ||||||||||
| Present | 1 | 24 | 4 | 20 | 5.3 | 0.00 | 0.167 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 1.5 |
| Absent | 0 | 173 | 44 | 129 | ||||||
| Age (y) | ||||||||||
| <47 | 1 | 80 | 17 | 63 | 1.83 | 1 | ||||
| >47 | 0 | 117 | 31 | 86 | ||||||
| Sex | ||||||||||
| Female | 1 | 75 | 17 | 58 | 0.71 | 1 | ||||
| Male | 0 | 122 | 31 | 91 | ||||||
| Tumour size | ||||||||||
| >0.55 | 1 | 164 | 32 | 41 | 7.21 | 0.005 | 0.041 | 5.0 | 1.1 | 23.7 |
| <0.55 | 0 | 33 | 16 | 108 | ||||||