| Literature DB >> 28533549 |
Hong-Ran Li1, Hui-Peng Pan2, Yun-Li Tao1, You-Jun Zhang3, Dong Chu4.
Abstract
Invasive genotypes may be associated with their ability to access the invasion habitat. The whitefly, Bemisia tabaci Q, has been an important agricultural pest in China since 2008. In order to identify the invasion routes and to provide insight into its invasion success in China, we analyzed the composition, distribution, and genetic diversity of mitochondrial haplotypes of B. tabaci Q. Samples were obtained from 23 provincial level administrative units in 2011, and analyses conducted based on the mtCOI. Our results revealed five haplotypes (abbreviated as Q1H1-Q1H5) were present in the Q1 subclade based on 773-bp mtCOI fragment analysis. The diversity of haplotypes indicated the B. tabaci Q populations were derived from multiple invasion sources originating from the western Mediterranean region. Among the haplotypes, Q1H1 was dominant, followed by Q1H2. The whitefly populations were generally characterized by low levels of genetic diversity based on the 773-bp mtCOI fragment. Similar results were obtained when the 657-bp fragment was analyzed using the procedure in a previous report. Potential mechanisms contributing to the dominance of the Q1H1 in China are also discussed. These results will be helpful in revealing the mechanisms that enabled the successful invasion of B. tabaci Q into the country.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28533549 PMCID: PMC5440374 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-02433-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Collections sampling localities and details for Bemisia tabaci in China in 2011.
| Regions | Location | Host | Number of | Number of Q | Q haplotype Based 657 bp | Q1H1 | Q haplotype Based 773 bp | Number of B | Number of other whitefly species | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hap1 | Hap2 | Q1H2 | Others | ||||||||
| Northwestern China | Tulufan, Xinjiang | Cotton, eggplant | 32 | 27 | 17 | 10 | 17 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| Yangling, Shaanxi | Tomato | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Southwestern China | Chongqing | Tomato, eggplant, cucumber | 9 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Northern China | Huhehaote, Inner Mongolia | Tomato | 17 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 0 |
| Yuncheng, Shanxi | Cotton | 25 | 16 | 13 | 2 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 0 | |
| Changping, Beijing | Tomato, cotton | 28 | 27 | 22 | 5 | 21 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| Tianjin | Tomato, cucumber, eggplant | 17 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 0 | |
| Shijiangzhuang, Hebei | Tomato, cotton, eggplant | 16 | 16 | 12 | 4 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| Central China | Wuhan, Hubei | Cotton, eggplant, cucumber | 22 | 22 | 21 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Changsha, Hunan | Tomato, eggplant | 4 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Luoyang, Henan | Tomato, cotton, eggplant | 39 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 27 | 0 | |
| Northeastern China | Changchun, Jilin | Tomato, cotton, eggplant | 24 | 24 | 20 | 2 | 19 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Daqing, Helongjiang | Soybean | 15 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | 15 | 0 | |
| Chaoyang, Liaoning | Tomato | 106 | 88 | 70 | 14 | 64 | 14 | 2 | 18 | 0 | |
| Eastern China | Nanjing, Jiangsu | Tomato, cotton, eggplant | 44 | 44 | 38 | 6 | 38 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Hefei, Anhui | Tomato, cotton, eggplant | 49 | 14 | 10 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 29 | |
| Fuzhou, Fujian | Tomato, eggplant | 58 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | 52 | 6 | |
| Fengxian, Shanghai | Tomato, eggplant | 13 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Nanchang, Jiangxi | Eggplant | 23 | 23 | 22 | 0 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Taiwan | Tomato, eggplant | 9 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | 9 | 0 | |
| Hangzhou, Zhejiang | Tomato, cotton, eggplant | 19 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | |
| Southern China | Nanning, Guangxi | Tomato, cucumber, eggplant | 56 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 8 | 13 | 0 | 35 | 0 |
| Haikou, Hainan | Tomato, eggplant | 19 | 14 | 3 | 11 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 3 | |
| Total | 648 | 396 | 306 | 80 | 280 | 79 | 12 | 214 | 38 | ||
The haplotypes that were determined refers to haplotypes belonging to Q where there were at least two identical sequences.
Figure 1Distribution of Bemisia tabaci species in China in 2011. Circles denote proportion of B. tabaci B (black), Q (red) and other species (green) in collections. This China map was created using Microsoft PowerPoint (version 2010) by author Hui-Peng Pan.
Figure 2Distribution of haplotypes among Bemisia tabaci Q in China in 2011 based on 773-bp mtCOI fragment. Circles denote proportion of Q1H1 (brown), Q1H2 (yellow) and other haplotypes (light green) in collections. This China map was created using Microsoft PowerPoint (version 2010) by author Hui-Peng Pan.
Genetic diversity indices of Bemisia tabaci Q collections in China in 2011 based on 773-bp mtCOI fragment.
| Location* (Number of individuals tested) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xinjiang (27) | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.484 (0.054) | 0.00063 (0.00007) | 0.00063 | 0.484 | 1.39947 ( | 1.514 (ns) |
| Chongqing (9) | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0.639 (0.126) | 0.00101 (0.00026) | 0.00101 | 0.778 | 0.19590 ( | −0.108 ( |
| Inner Mongolia (5) | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.400 (0.237) | 0.00052 (0.00031) | 0.00052 | 0.400 | −0.81650 ( | 0.090 ( |
| Shanxi (13) | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0.410 (0.154) | 0.00056 (0.00023) | 0.00056 | 0.436 | −0.90920 ( | −0.790 ( |
| Hebei (14) | 3 | 3 | 4 | 0.571 (0.132) | 0.00084 (0.00024) | 0.00084 | 0.648 | −0.95732 ( | −1.362 ( |
| Beijing (27) | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0.373 (0.101) | 0.00050 (0.00014) | 0.00050 | 0.387 | −0.53597 ( | −0.490 ( |
| Tianjin (8) | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0.464 (0.200) | 0.00065 (0.00031) | 0.00065 | 0.500 | −1.31009 ( | −0.999 ( |
| Hubei (22) | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0.255 (0.116) | 0.00034 (0.00016) | 0.00034 | 0.264 | −1.17515 ( | −1.310 ( |
| Henan (12) | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.303 (0.147) | 0.00039 (0.00019) | 0.00039 | 0.303 | −0.19492 ( | 0.297 ( |
| Jilin (21) | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.181 (0.104) | 0.00023 (0.00014) | 0.00023 | 0.181 | −0.61772 ( | −0.137 ( |
| Liaoning (82) | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0.333 (0.058) | 0.00044 (0.00008) | 0.00044 | 0.342 | −0.24678 ( | −0.152 ( |
| Jiangsu (44) | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.241 (0.076) | 0.00031 (0.00010) | 0.00031 | 0.241 | 0.06730 ( | 0.551 ( |
| Anhui (11) | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0.473 (0.162) | 0.00066 (0.00025) | 0.00066 | 0.509 | −0.77815 ( | −0.659 ( |
| Shanghai (12) | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.303 (0.147) | 0.00039 (0.00019) | 0.00039 | 0.303 | −0.19492 ( | 0.297 ( |
| Jiangxi (22) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.000 (0.000) | 0.00000 (0.00000) | 0.00000 | 0.000 | — | — |
| Guangxi (21) | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.495 (0.060) | 0.00064 (0.00009) | 0.00064 | 0.495 | 1.38372 ( | 1.403 ( |
| Hainan (14) | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.363 (0.130) | 0.00047 (0.00017) | 0.00047 | 0.363 | 0.32440 ( | 0.643 ( |
*The indices for the Shannxi, Hunan and Zhejiang samples were not calculated because the numbers of individuals were below 5; S, number of polymorphic (segregating) sites; η, total number of mutations; H, number of haplotypes; Hd, haplotype diversity; π, nucleotide diversity; K, average number of nucleotide differences; π(JC), nucleotide diversity with Jukes and Cantor correction; D, Tajima’s D statistic; Fs, Fu’s F test statistic; ns, not significant.
Figure 3Network analyses of haplotype relationships based on 773-bp mtCOI fragment. Colors within the nodes: red, Southeastern China; orange, Central China; yellow, Northwestern China; purple, Northeastern China; blue, Northern China; pink, Eastern China; black, Southern China.