| Literature DB >> 21364988 |
Sharyn J Goldstien1, Lise Dupont, Frédérique Viard, Paul J Hallas, Teruaki Nishikawa, David R Schiel, Neil J Gemmell, John D D Bishop.
Abstract
The solitary ascidian Styela clava Herdman, 1882 is considered to be native to Japan, Korea, northern China and the Russian Federation in the NW Pacific, but it has spread globally over the last 80 years and is now established as an introduced species on the east and west coasts of North America, Europe, Australia and New Zealand. In eastern Canada it reaches sufficient density to be a serious pest to aquaculture concerns. We sequenced a fragment of the cytochrome oxidase subunit I mitochondrial gene (COI) from a total of 554 individuals to examine the genetic relationships of 20 S. clava populations sampled throughout the introduced and native ranges, in order to investigate invasive population characteristics. The data presented here show a moderate level of genetic diversity throughout the northern hemisphere. The southern hemisphere (particularly New Zealand) displays a greater amount of haplotype and nucleotide diversity in comparison. This species, like many other invasive species, shows a range of genetic diversities among introduced populations independent of the age of incursion. The successful establishment of this species appears to be associated with multiple incursions in many locations, while other locations appear to have experienced rapid expansion from a potentially small population with reduced genetic diversity. These contrasting patterns create difficulties when attempting to manage and mitigate a species that continues to spread among ports and marinas around the world.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21364988 PMCID: PMC3043059 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016755
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Population locations, sample sizes (N) and summary statistics for Styela clava.
| Population | Country | Sample ID | N | H | Pb15 | Crt | Crs | Crd | U:S | π | Theta(S) |
| Otsuchi Bay | Japan | OTS | 32 | 11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Tsukumo Bay | Japan | TSU | 27 | 8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Prince Edward Isl. | Canada | PEI | 19 | 2 | 0.99 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0∶2 | 0.0005 | 0.29 |
| Doverodde | Denmark | DOV | 24 | 3 | 1.96 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0∶3 | 0.0015 | 0.54 |
| Brest | France | BRE | 30 | 4 | 2.02 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0∶4 | 0.0006 | 0.76 |
| Cork | Ireland | COR | 32 | 7 | 3.96 | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.000 | 0∶7 | 0.0013 | 1.49 |
| Ria de Ferrol | Spain | RIA | 32 | 8 | 4.57 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 1∶7 | 0.0016 | 1.49 |
| Plymouth | UK | MOU | 30 | 8 | 4.66 | 0.000 | 0.010 | 0.000 | 0∶8 | 0.0013 | 1.77 |
| Avery Point | East USA | AP | 27 | 9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Mumford Cove | East USA | MC | 22 | 5 | 0.52 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 2∶3 | 0.0010 | 1.10 |
| Mission Bay | West USA | MB | 31 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.002 | 0∶1 | 0.0000 | 0.00 |
| Niwatec River | East USA | NR | 22 | 5 | 3.27 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0∶5 | 0.0015 | 1.32 |
| Puget Sound | West USA | PS | 24 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0∶1 | 0.0000 | 0.00 |
| Santa Barbara | West USA | SB | 32 | 3 | 0.94 | 0.008 | 0.000 | 0.035 | 0∶3 | 0.0003 | 0.50 |
| Los Angeles | West USA | LA | 27 | 8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| San Francisco | West USA | SF | 33 | 6 | 3.07 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 2∶4 | 0.0004 | 1.23 |
| Woods Hole | East USA | WH | 30 | 6 | 3.89 | 0.000 | 0.002 | 0.000 | 1∶5 | 0.0016 | 1.26 |
| Hauraki Gulf | New Zealand | HG | 32 | 12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Lyttelton Hbr | New Zealand | LYT | 31 | 13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Melbourne | Australia | AUS | 16 | 6 | 4.81 | 0.036 | 0.011 | 0.025 | 0∶6 | 0.0035 | 1.81 |
The identification code for each population is included. Summary statistics are: H, number of haplotypes; Pb[15], haplotypic richness with rarefaction; Crt, contribution to total haplotypic richness; U:S, proportion of unique: shared haplotypes; π, nucleotide diversity; and Theta(S), the population mutation rate estimated from the number of segregating sites.
Note: Bold text highlights the populations with the highest diversity across multiple measures.
Figure 1Haplotype distribution for the mtDNA COI gene of Styela clava populations sampled in 2006.
Pie colours correspond to the haplotypes in Figure 2 and population codes follow Table 1.
Figure 2Statistical parsimony network for the mtDNA COI gene of Styela clava populations sampled in 2006.
Unique haplotypes are not coloured and those unique haplotypes observed in the Lyttelton population are circled. Haplotypes that appear in the text are numbered accordingly.
Figure 3Scatter plots of theta(S) and haplotypic richness (Pb[), against years since the first reported incursion of Styela clava from 20 populations sampled globally ( ).
Data points are coloured to represent populations from geographic regions: Europe (black), east coast Nth America (light grey), west coast USA (black stripe), and southern hemisphere (white).
Figure 4Bayesian population structure groups for the mtDNA COI gene of Styela clava determined using BAPS v.3.2.
Circles are coloured to represent genetically similar populations. The unfilled circles represent populations that do not group with any others. Population codes follow Table 1.
F-statistics for Styela clava AMOVA results.
| Source of variation | Among groups (ΦCT) | Among populations, within groups (ΦSC) | Within populations (ΦST) |
| BAPS Groups | 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.24 |
| Geographical Regions | 0.08 | 0.15 | 0.22 |
The data were partitioned in two ways: 1) BAPS Groups obtained from Bayesian analysis without prior population designation; 2) Populations grouped by geographical region. All results are significant (p<0.01).
Geographical regions: Japan, Europe, Australia, New Zealand, West USA, East USA, and Canada.