José M Cuevas1,2, María Durán-Moreno1, Rafael Sanjuán1,2. 1. Institute for Integrative Systems Biology (I2SysBio), Universitat de València, C/Catedrático José Beltrán 2, 46980 Paterna, Valencia, Spain. 2. Department of Genetics, Universitat de València, C/Dr. Moliner 50, 46100 Burjassot, València, Spain.
Abstract
Many animal viruses are enveloped in a lipid bilayer taken up from cellular membranes. Because viral surface proteins bind to these membranes to initiate infection, we hypothesized that free virions may also be capable of interacting with the envelopes of other virions extracellularly. Here, we demonstrate this hypothesis in the vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), a prototypic negative-strand RNA virus composed of an internal ribonucleocapsid, a matrix protein and an external envelope1. Using microscopy, dynamic light scattering, differential centrifugation and flow cytometry, we show that free viral particles can spontaneously aggregate into multi-virion infectious units. We also show that, following establishment of these contacts, different viral genetic variants are co-transmitted to the same target cell. Furthermore, virion-virion binding can determine key aspects of viral fitness such as antibody escape. In purified virions, this process is driven by protein-lipid interactions probably involving the VSV surface glycoprotein and phosphatidylserine. Whereas we found that multi-virion complexes occurred unfrequently in standard cell cultures, they were abundant in other fluids such as saliva, a natural VSV shedding route2. Our findings contrast with the commonly accepted perception of virions as passive propagules and show the ability of enveloped viruses to establish collective infectious units, which could in turn facilitate the evolution of virus-virus interactions and of social-like traits3.
Many animal viruses are enveloped in a lipid bilayer taken up from cellular membranes. Because viral surface proteins bind to these membranes to initiate infection, we hypothesized that free virions may also be capable of interacting with the envelopes of other virions extracellularly. Here, we demonstrate this hypothesis in the vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), a prototypic negative-strand RNA virus composed of an internal ribonucleocapsid, a matrix protein and an external envelope1. Using microscopy, dynamic light scattering, differential centrifugation and flow cytometry, we show that free viral particles can spontaneously aggregate into multi-virion infectious units. We also show that, following establishment of these contacts, different viral genetic variants are co-transmitted to the same target cell. Furthermore, virion-virion binding can determine key aspects of viral fitness such as antibody escape. In purified virions, this process is driven by protein-lipid interactions probably involving the VSV surface glycoprotein and phosphatidylserine. Whereas we found that multi-virion complexes occurred unfrequently in standard cell cultures, they were abundant in other fluids such as saliva, a natural VSV shedding route2. Our findings contrast with the commonly accepted perception of virions as passive propagules and show the ability of enveloped viruses to establish collective infectious units, which could in turn facilitate the evolution of virus-virus interactions and of social-like traits3.
Following infection of baby hamster kidney (BHK-21) cells, we purified VSV
virions by gradient ultracentrifugation and imaged the virion suspension by transmission
electron microscopy. This showed typical, bullet-shaped virions of approximately 175
× 65 nm in size, but also revealed the presence of virion-virion contacts (Fig. 1a; Supplementary Fig. 1a-c). Ultrathin sections of agar-encased
virions further suggested the involvement of envelope proteins in these contacts (Fig. 1b, Supplementary Fig. 1d). Such interactions were also observed by
negative staining, which allowed visualization of the spikes of the surface glycoprotein
(VSV-G) protruding from the envelope (Fig. 1c;
Supplementary Fig.
1e-h).
Fig. 1
Spontaneous aggregation of purified VSV virions.
Transmission electron micrographs of purified VSV virions (a-c),
showing a virion suspension positively stained with uranyl acetate
(a; arrows indicate contacts between virions), an ultrathin
section of agar-encased virions (b; four virions are shown in trans
section; the envelope bilayer is indicated with white dotted lines; the
structure protruding from the envelope lipid bilayer, indicated with an arrow,
probably corresponds to the envelope protein G), and a virion suspension
negatively stained with phosphotungstic acid (c; the envelope
protein is visible and appears to mediate virion-virion contacts, one of which
is indicated). Additional micrographs are shown in Supplementary Fig. 1.
Virions were subjected to DLS (d-g) by fixing virions immediately
(untreated) or after incubation, as indicated. The z-average values obtained
from six measurements are shown (d). Vertical grey lines indicate
the mean z-average. Treatment effects were evaluated relative to the untreated
group using t-tests (ns: P > 0.05; **:
P < 0.01; ***: P < 0.001).
e. Polydispersity indexes (pdi) obtained in the same set of
measurements. Particle size distribution curves, expressed as the percentage
total light scattering intensity (f) and raw auto-correlation data
(g) are shown, where each curve is an average from the six
measurements. h. Effect of aggregation on infectivity, as
determined in BHK-21 cells by the plaque assay after incubating purified virions
at 37°C for the indicated times. To assess PFU weight, virions were
centrifuged directly (blue) or after 2 h incubation at 37°C (red), and
the pellet and supernatant were titrated by the plaque assay (i;
the pellet/supernatant titer ratio is represented). Pellet/supernatant titer
ratios for increasing centrifugation forces (5 min spin) after incubating
virions 1 h at 37°C are also shown (j). Error bars indicate
the standard error of the mean from three assays.
We then used dynamic light scattering (DLS) to infer the hydrodynamic diameter
(HD) of purified virions (Fig. 1d-g). Consistent
with the VSV size, the HD harmonic mean (z-average) of viral particles was 170.7
± 1.0 nm. However, we found significantly higher z-averages when virions were
incubated at 37°C (pH 7.4) for various times (t-tests: P
< 0.001), and this shift was accompanied by an increase in HD variance. After 1 h
at 37°C, an estimated 91.8% of light scattering intensity was associated to
particles with HD > 300 nm, as opposed to only 2.9% in non-incubated virions .
Virion aggregation was further demonstrated by nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA;
Supplementary Videos 1 and
2). Longer incubation times
(2 h, 4 h, overnight) yielded particle sizes falling outside the range of values than
can be reliably measured by DLS and NTA (> 1 µm) and, after overnight
incubation, virion aggregates were easily observed under a light microscope (Supplementary Fig. 2). In
contrast to the extensive aggregation found at 37°C, incubation of virions at
25°C produced little or no change in particle size (Fig. 1d-g).To test whether aggregates were infectious, purified virions were incubated at
37°C for various times and then used to infect BHK-21 monolayers to determine
viral titers (plaque forming units, PFU per mL). The viral titer decreased more than two
orders of magnitude after 2 h at 37°C (Fig.
1h). This could be attributed to virion degradation or aggregation. To test
whether, as a result of aggregation, infectivity was increasingly associated to
high-weight, multi-virion PFUs, we used low-speed centrifugation (10 min at 5000 g).
After 2 h at 37°C the majority of PFUs (94.0 ± 1.4%) were located in the
pellet, as opposed to only 7.3 ± 1.5% in controls kept at 4°C (Fig. 1i). High-weight PFUs were also detected using
different incubation times and centrifugation speeds (Fig.
1j). Hence, VSV aggregation leads to an increased virion:PFU ratio.To assess whether aggregated virions can be co-transmitted to the same target
cells, we used two VSV recombinants encoding mCherry and GFP. Purified virions of each
type were prepared separately and used to infect BHK-21 cells at low multiplicity of
infection (MOI, defined as PFU/cell at inoculation), such that co-infection should be
infrequent. Flow cytometry analysis at 6 h post inoculation (hpi) showed that, as
expected, the fraction of red/green doubly fluorescent cells was low (0.13%-0.14% versus
0.15%-0.17% expected by chance). In contrast, when the VSV-GFP and VSV-mCherry stocks
were co-incubated at 37°C for 2 h prior to inoculation, doubly fluorescent cells
increased by 20-fold (2.98%-3.36%) and became nearly as abundant as red/green singly
fluorescent cells (Fig. 2a). Using a probabilistic
model (Supplementary Fig. 3),
we inferred that 61.2% of all virions in the inoculum had bound to other virions and
formed dual infectious units after 2 h at 37°C, whereas this fraction was 32.1%
after 0.5 h at 37°C (Supplementary Table 1). Therefore, virion aggregation leads to the
co-transmission of multiple viral genomes to the same cells. In contrast, a much weaker
increase in co-infection rates was obtained when virions were pre-incubated at
25°C (0.29%-0.67% doubly-fluorescent cells; 2.7% dual infectious units by flow
cytometry; Fig. 2a). The probabilistic analysis of
virion-virion binding based on GFP/mCherry cell counts will be further used below,
referred to as the co-fluorescence test.
Fig. 2
Functional implications of multi-virion infectious units.
Proof of concept for the co-transmission of genetic variants was obtained by flow
cytometry using two fluorescently labelled viruses (a). Cells were
inoculated with VSV-mCherry and VSV-GFP, incubated 7 h, and counted
(105 events per assay). Bottom: uninfected (blue),
mCherry-positive (red), GFP-positive (green), and doubly fluorescent (purple)
cell counts following direct inoculation with VSV-GFP and VSV-mCherry
(untreated) or after co-incubation of the two virion types (0.5 h at
37°C, 2 h at 37°C, or 2 h at 25°C). Two independent assays
(1, 2) are shown for each condition. Top: flow cytometry scatter plot from two
of the experiments. The estimated fraction of total virions forming dual
infectious units was inferred using a probabilistic model detailed in Supplementary Fig. 3.
Data are provided in Supplementary Table 1. b. Effects of virion-virion
binding on antibody escape. Plaque assays of the MAb-resistant (A3853C) and
MAb-sensitive (WT) variants following pre-incubation of the two types of virions
(37°C, 2 h) at different proportions (v:v): 5:0, 5:1, 5:5, 5:10, and
5:20. For each treatment, plaque assays were done in the absence of MAb (grey),
adding MAb to the culture medium to inhibit plaque development (dark red) or
adding MAb prior to cell inoculation to inhibit cell entry (light red). Data
points indicate average titers (PFU/mL) obtained from three independent assays,
and error bars indicate the standard error of the mean.
We then set out to test whether virion-virion binding could promote functional
interactions between different genetic variants of the virus. For this, we used an
engineered VSV mutant (A3853C) resistant to an anti-VSV-G neutralizing MAb4. As expected, the A3853C mutant grew normally in
BHK-21 cells cultured with MAb, whereas viruses not carrying this mutation (WT) were
unable to form plaques. In contrast, when a constant volume of the A3853C stock was
pre-incubated (37°C, 2 h) with increasing amounts of the WT (5:1, 5:5, 5:10, and
5:20), the A3853C plaque forming efficiency in the presence of MAb decreased (1.2-fold,
7.7-fold, 11-fold, and 18-fold, respectively; t-tests: P < 0.05
for 5:1 and P < 0.001 for all other combinations; Fig. 2b). Hence, the WT had a dominant negative
effect on the MAb-resistant mutant, suggesting that hybrid A3853C/WT virion aggregates
were neutralized. Similar results were obtained when mixed virions were treated with MAb
prior to cell inoculation instead of during plaque development, indicating that
neutralization of hybrid virion complexes occurred before the first infection cycle
(Fig. 2b).To investigate possible molecular mechanisms involved in virion-virion binding,
we first digested VSV-GFP with trypsin to remove VSV-G and other surface proteins from
the envelope. This should abolish infectivity, since the VSV-G protein is required for
cell attachment and entry. After purifying the digested virions, we infected BHK-21
cells at low MOI with an approximately 1:1 mixture of trypsin-digested VSV-GFP virions
and intact VSV-mCherry virions. Flow cytometry at 6 hpi yielded 4.4% and 5.4% of
mCherry-positive cells in two independent assays, but minimal GFP counts (0.030% and
0.022%, respectively) as well as extremely infrequent doubly fluorescent cells (0.015%
and 0.019%, respectively; Fig. 3a; Supplementary Table 2), as
expected. In contrast, when trypsin-digested VSV-GFP and intact VSV-mCherry virions were
co-incubated at 37°C for 2 h prior to cell inoculation, doubly-fluorescent cells
increased >300-fold (5.5% and 7.6% in two independent assays) and became similarly
abundant as singly mCherry fluorescent cells (5.4% and 5.6%, respectively). This shows
that the G protein of one virion is sufficient for promoting the entry of another, bound
virion. It also shows that the surface proteins of VSV-GFP virions were not required for
binding VSV-mCherry virions and, hence, that aggregation is not driven by
protein-protein interactions. Unexpectedly, singly GFP-positive cells also increased
following virion co-incubation (1.9% and 2.8%). Stronger and/or earlier GFP fluorescence
compared to mCherry might have led us to erroneously assign some doubly fluorescent
cells as GFP-only cells and, hence, to underestimate virion-virion binding and
co-transmission. Alternatively, even if both virion types co-entered the same cells,
early stochastic loss of one of the two variants could have occurred in some cases.
Supporting this possibility, the increase in GFP-positive cells was less pronounced when
flow cytometry was repeated at an earlier time point (4 hpi; Supplementary Table 2).
Fig. 3
Envelope protein-lipid interactions mediate virion-virion binding in
VSV.
a. Co-fluorescence test. Cells were inoculated with VSV-mCherry and
with pre-trypsinized VSV-GFP, and subsequently analyzed by flow cytometry
(105 events per assay). Counts of uninfected (blue),
mCherry-positive (red), GFP-positive (green), and doubly fluorescent (purple)
cells after direct inoculation with the viral mix (untreated) or after
co-incubation of the two virion types (37°C, 2 h) are shown. Two
independent assays (1, 2) are shown for each condition. b. DLS
assays showing the effects of various treatments on virion aggregation. Purified
virions were incubated at 37°C for 1 h alone (control) or in the presence
of trypsin, PLC, PLA1A, annexin V, or mouse RAP. The change in z-average
relative to the average change in z-average obtained for controls is shown, i.e.
Δ(z-average treatment)/Δ(z-average control). All assays were
performed in triplicate and the error bar represents the standard error of the
mean.
DLS indicated that virion aggregation was fully inhibited in the presence of
trypsin (Fig. 3b), showing that the process is
dependent on virion surface proteins. Together with the above results, this indicates
that virion-virion binding is driven by protein-lipid interactions. The VSV envelope,
which is uptaken from the plasma membrane of infected cells, is mainly composed of
cholesterol, sphingomyelin, GM3 ganglioside, phosphatidylcholine,
phosphatidylethanolamine, and phosphatidylserine (PS)5. Early work suggested that PS might be the VSV cellular receptor but this
was later rejected because, in healthy cells, PS is located in the internal plasma
membrane leaflet and hence is not available to virions6. However, VSV-G can bind PS through electrostatic interactions7,8. We found
that aggregation was enhanced in the presence of phospholipase C (PLC), which hydrolyzes
several phospholipids but not PS9. We then
performed DLS assays in the presence of PS-specific phospholipase A1α (PLA1A). As
opposed to PLC, virion aggregation was diminished by PLA1A. Annexin V, a highly-specific
PS-binding protein10, also inhibited aggregation
partially. These data strongly suggest that interactions between VSV-G and PS are
involved in virion-virion binding. The reason why PLC promoted aggregation is unclear.
PLC might increase the surface exposure of PS, or envelope disruption produced by PLC
treatment might expose matrix proteins, which could then interact with VSV-G.In addition to VSV-G, the viral envelope also contains other, less abundant
cellular proteins of unknown functional relevance for the virus. In virions egressed
from BHK-21 cells, the second most abundant surface protein after VSV-G is Lrp111, a member of the LDL receptor family. Since LDL
receptors are used for VSV cell attachment and entry12, we sought to test whether interactions between VSV-G and Lrp1 may also
contribute to virion-virion binding. For this, we performed DLS assays in the presence
of RAP, an Lrp1 inhibitor that prevents ligand binding13. We found a minimal effect of RAP on z-average values, thus providing no
support for this hypothesis (Fig. 3b).All the above experiments were conducted using high-titer, purified virions,
raising the question whether virion-virion binding could take place under more
physiological conditions. To test this in the context of an infected cell culture, we
inoculated BHK-21 monolayers with VSV-mCherry at high MOI (10 PFU/cell), such that the
vast majority of cells were infected by this inoculum. After 45 min absorption and 4 h
incubation in infection medium (DMEM with 2% FBS), we added ca. 109 PFU of
VSV-GFP to the cultures, and collected supernatants 3 h later for analysis.
Superinfection exclusion should block entry of VSV-GFP14. Furthermore, internalized VSV-GFP virions could not have replicated and
released progeny within 3 h. Consistently, flow cytometry indicated that < 0.1%
of the cells were GFP-positive at the time of sampling. Hence, direct interaction
between VSV-GFP and VSV-mCherry virions could only have taken place extracellularly. To
assess whether the collected supernatants contained virion aggregates, we used the
co-fluorescence test. According to our probabilistic model (Supplementary Fig. 3), 5.9
± 1.0 % of virions had formed dual infectious units, as opposed to an estimated
– 0.18 ± 0.62% in controls in which the two viruses were not co-incubated.
Hence, multi-virion infectious units arose in these cell cultures, albeit to a much
lower extent than in gradient-purified virions.The limited amount of virion aggregation found above could be attributed to the
lower viral titer used (109 versus 1011 PFU/mL for purified
virions) or to the physicochemical properties of the media employed. To explore this, we
co-incubated 109 PFU/mL of each VSV-mCherry and GFP-VSV in different media
(Fig. 4a; Supplementary Table 1). Whereas
virion-virion binding at 37°C was unfrequent in DMEM with 2% FBS (3.6 ±
1.0% virions in dual infectious units after overnight incubation) or FBS alone (1.2
± 0.4% after 2 h), it was more abundant in human plasma (6.4% to 17.6% after 2 h
depending on the subject). Since the oral cavity is a major site of infection for VSV,
causing stomatitis, we set out to test for virion aggregation in saliva. We first
collected samples from four volunteers. For a starting titer of ca. 109
PFU/mL of each VSV-GFP and VSV-mCherry, the co-fluorescence test indicated that the
fraction of virions forming dual infectious units ranged from 31.2% to 35.0% in three
individuals and was extremely high for the fourth individual (94.9%) after 1 h
co-incubation at 37°C (longer incubation times could not be assayed due to loss
of infectivity). When the experiment was repeated using saliva from the fourth donor but
with a starting titer of only 107 PFU/mL, virions in dual infectious units
were still highly abundant (50.8%), confirming that virion-virion binding depended more
on the properties of the medium than on virion concentration. To ascertain whether these
results could be reproduced in saliva from a more typical VSV host, we used four cows.
Rapid loss of infectivity was again observed in saliva from 3/4 cows. After only 15 min
at 37°C the fraction of virions in dual infectious units ranged from 46.9% to
88.5% in three of the samples, whereas saliva from the fourth cow showed little or no
viral titer loss and a lower level of aggregation (9.3%). We conclude that VSV
aggregation and co-transmission of variants is promoted by human and cow saliva.
Overall, we found a significant correlation between the rate of titer loss and levels of
aggregation across media (DMEM, plasma, human saliva, and bovine saliva), consistent
with our above finding that aggregation increases the virion:PFU ratio (Fig. 4b).
Fig. 4
VSV virion-virion binding in cell culture media, plasma, and saliva.
a. In each of the fluids tested, ca. 109 PFU/mL of each
VSV-GFP and VSV-mCherry were co-incubated at 37°C for 2 h in FBS or human
(h) plasma, 1 h in human saliva, or 15 min in cow (c) saliva, or not
co-incubated (untreated). For one of the human salivas, the test was done both
at 109 PFU/mL (circle) and 107 PFU/mL (cross). The amount
of virion aggregation is represented as the fraction of virions forming dual
PFUs estimated by the co-fluorescence test (see Methods and Supplementary Fig. 3; cell counts are available from Supplementary Table 1).
For plasma and saliva, each data point corresponds to an individual donor
(human/cow) and represents the average of two independent assays. For FBS, three
independent assays are plotted. For untreated viruses, the estimated amount of
virion aggregation fluctuated around zero (from –1.4% to 1.9% in six
independent assays) and is shown as a single blue dot at the lower-limit of the
plot range. b. Virion aggregation as a function of the final titer
(i.e. after incubation), showing the correlation between titer loss and
aggregation.
Early electron microscopy studies indicated that viral particles can form
aggregates in a variety of viruses including tobacco mosaic virus15, poxviruses16, influenza
virus17, VSV18, and poliovirus19, but this was
mainly viewed from a technical standpoint and the molecular basis and implications have
remained largely unexplored. More recent work in which we analyzed the VSV genetic
diversity produced by single infected cells suggested that infectious units could be
constituted by multiple virions20. Furthermore,
aggregation has been recently found to favor the co-transmission of different genetic
variants in poliovirus and to increase plaque formation efficiency in highly mutated
populations, suggesting genetic complementation21. Here, we have investigated the mechanism and implications of aggregation in
VSV, a prototypic enveloped, negative strand RNA virus (see Supplementary Fig. 4 for a
graphical abstract of our findings). We have also found that virion-virion binding
occurs strongly in saliva, moderately in plasma and unfrequently in standard culture
media. This suggests that the process could be relevant in vivo, but
also that typical virus culturing conditions may not be suited for studying it. VSV
produces ulcers and vesicles in the oral and nasal mucosa, which can contain
109 PFU/mL of VSV22. The saliva is
an important route of viral shedding and could act as a vehicle for transmission to
plant-eating arthropod vectors2,23. We found that the VSV titer decayed rapidly in
virion-aggregating saliva, from 109 PFU/mL to < 107 PFU/mL
after 15 min in some cases (Fig. 4b).
Experimentally inoculated farm animals reach maximal viral loads that vary broadly, but
typical maximal values are on the order of 106-108 TCID50/mL in
the oral cavity, nose swabs, and other body compartments24–26. We suggest that, in
addition to dilution and degradation, the lower titers observed in some body fluids
compared to intra-lesion titers may be in part influenced by virion aggregation. As
such, virion aggregation could be viewed as an antiviral mechanism conceptually akin to
antibody-mediated agglutination. However, it is also possible that aggregates of virions
may have some advantage in terms of faster initiation of infection, increased survival
in the environment, or other fitness benefits. Future work may shed light on these
questions.Our results indicate that, although virion-virion binding can take place within
a realistic range of virion concentrations, it depends critically on the composition of
the medium. These physicochemical determinants remain to be elucidated. Candidate
factors are viscosity and ionic strength. Saliva, plasma, serum, and the buffer used for
virion purification all have viscosity values ≥ 1 mPa s, compared to 0.69 mPa s
for water at 37°C. We should note that virion aggregation and fusion of viral
envelopes has been previously observed under acidic conditions (pH < 6.5), in a
process that mimics fusion with endosomal membranes after cell entry27. In contrast, the extracellular virion-virion
binding process described here occurs at neutral pH. We identified VSV-G and PS as the
most likely molecular actors of virion-virion binding in purified virions, but it
remains to be explored whether the same molecular interactors drive aggregation in
plasma and saliva. Saliva may contain additional proteins or other macromolecules that
drive this process.PS is an endocytosis signal that triggers physiological mechanisms for recycling
cellular debris28. By incorporating PS into their
envelopes, many viruses exploit these pathways to entry into cells, a strategy known as
apoptotic mimicry29. Also, recent work has shown
that, in enteroviruses, encapsulation into PS vesicles enables the simultaneous
extracellular transmission of multiple virions30.
This suggests that PS may play a role in the transmission of various types of viruses,
through different mechanisms.Under the notion that virions function as independent infectious units, the
evolution virus-virus interactions, including cooperation and conflict, is difficult to
envisage because, although co-infection of cells with multiple virus variants is
possible under high-MOI regimes, the inherent population bottlenecks associated with
inter-cellular, organ-to-organ, and host-to-host transmission31 would make such interactions necessarily short-lived. In
contrast, multi-virion complexes and other forms of collective infectious units may
enable the co-transmission of different genetic variants of a virus regardless of
population bottlenecks3. Our findings could hence
contribute to explaining why some defective mutants, which are unable to replicate in
the absence of a functional variant, can nevertheless undergo sustained among-host
transmission, as has been found in dengue32 and
influenza33 viruses. In turn, this could have
implications for the use of transmissible interfering viruses as an anti-viral
intervention strategy34,35.Finally, our results contrast with the generally accepted view of virions as
individual, passive carriers of viral genetic information. Given that PS is a ubiquitous
component of membranes and that early electron microscopy studies reported virion
aggregation in several enveloped viruses, similar virion-virion binding and
co-transmission processes might take place in other viruses. Future work may elucidate
how virion aggregates and other types of multi-virion infectious units determine
social-like virus-virus interactions.
Methods
Cells, viruses, and reagents
BHK-21 fibroblasts were obtained from the American Type Culture
Collection (ATCC) and were not authenticated further. BHK-21 cells are not
listed in the ICLAC database of commonly misidentified cell lines. Cells were
cultured in Dulbeco’s modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) supplemented
with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS) at 37°C in a 5% CO2
humidified incubator, and tested mycoplasma negative by PCR. The following
commercially available reagents were used: trypsin (0.125%; GIBCO, 15090-046),
Clostridium welchii PLC (10 mg/mL; Sigma-Aldrich, P7633),
human PLA1A (1 mg/mL; ProSpec, ENZ-794), human placental annexin V (7.5 mg/mL;
Sigma-Aldrich, A9460), and mouse RAP (0.25 mg/mL; Sino Biological Inc.,
50281-M08H-50). A neutralizing MAb against VSV-G was obtained in house from a
mouse hybridoma cell line, as described previously36. An infectious Indiana VSV cDNA clone37 was used for introducing the A3853C
mutation by site-directed mutagenesis, as described previously4. The A3853C mutation is selectively
neutral in the absence of neutralizing MAb4. Reverse genetics was also used to clone the mCherry and GFP genes
at the intergenic region between the G and L genes. VSV-mCherry and VSV-GFP
virions were used for microscopy, DLS, and centrifugation assays. The morphology
and physical properties of these virions should be identical to those of the
wild type, since GFP and mCherry are not structural proteins. In antibody
neutralization assays VSV-GFP was also used as a surrogate wild type.
Saliva and plasma collection
Saliva was collected from cows (Bos taurus females,
strain Frisona) at a local farm (La Muntanyeta Coop. V.) under veterinary
supervision, following standard non-invasive procedures that guaranteed animal
welfare, in compliance with Spanish legislation. Animals were between two and
six years old and were selected randomly by the veterinary. We found no
correlation between age and aggregation status. Human saliva was provided by
four volunteers, who all gave informed consent. This included three men and one
woman aged between 25 and 41 years old, with no observed correlation between
aggregation status and age. The strongest aggregating saliva was from the woman,
which may be coincidental. The sample size (four individuals for cows and
humans) was selected for convenience, with no a priori statistical
consideration. Both types of saliva were filtered with a 0.45 μm
cellulose filter, aliquoted, and stored at –70°C until use.
Plasmas were obtained from blood donors at the Hospital General de Valencia
(Spain) by collecting the higher fraction of centrifuged blood samples (1200 g,
10 min, 4°C) and stored at –70°C until use. The procedure
for collecting plasma was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Universitat
de València.
Plaque assays
Confluent BHK-21 monolayers were used for virus titrations. The
monolayers were inoculated for 45 min under standard culturing conditions
(37°C, 5% CO2) and then overlaid with DMEM supplemented with
2% FBS and 0.5% agarose. After 20 h, cells were fixed with 10% formaldehyde,
stained with 2% crystal violet in 10% formaldehyde, and plaques were
counted.
Virion purification
Stocks of VSV-mCherry, VSV-GFP, and VSV-A3853C were prepared by
inoculating eight BHK-21 confluent T175 flasks at an MOI of 0.01 PFU/mL and
collecting supernatants upon appearance of the first obvious cytopathic effects
(ca. 20 hpi). Large cellular debris were removed by spinning (780 g, 5 min) and
filtering (0.22 µm) supernatants. Virions were then pelleted at 30,000 g,
4°C, 1.5 h in a Beckman Coulter Avanti J25I centrifuge with a JA-14
rotor. The pellet was resuspended in 2 mL NaCl 0.6%, Tris 0.6%,
EDTA.Na2.2H2O 0.02% buffer (pH 7.4), laid on a 5-50% iodixanol
(Optiprep, Sigma) gradient in ultra-clear thin-walled tubes, and
ultra-centrifuged at 160,000 g, 4°C, 1.5 h in a Beckman Optima L90 K
centrifuge with a SW41-Ti rotor. Approximately 700 µL of a whitish band
generated at mid-gradient were collected, aliquoted, and stored immediately at
–70°C. Final titers were on the order of 1011 PFU/mL
for all viral stocks, as determined by plaque assays in BHK-21 cells.
Microscopy
Purified virions were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde 5% glutaraldehyde
solution in phosphate buffer 0.1 M by incubating the mix at room temperature for
at least 1 h. For direct observation of the virion suspension, 5 µL of
this mix were deposited onto formvar mesh grids and dried gently at room
temperature. Grids were washed three times through contact with the surface of
distilled water drop and immersed 5 min in 2% uranyl acetate drop for positive
staining, or 1 min in 1.5% phosphotungstic acid for negative staining. After
drying, grids were imaged and photographed under a Jeol JEM-1010 electron
microscope. For observation of virions in cross section, the fixed preparations
were encased in a 1% agar cone. The fixator was then removed by successive
phosphate buffer 0.1 M washes, and preparations were post-fixed and stained with
2% osmium solution, dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol and stained during
dehydration with 2% uranyl acetate in ethanol 70%. Samples were embedded in
Durcupan epoxy resin and polymerized for 72 h at 70°C. Semi-thin sections
(1.5 µm) were obtained using a Leica EM UC-6 ultra-microtome (Leica) and
stained with 1% toluidine blue at 70°C for optical microscopy. Ultrathin
sections (0.08 μm) were obtained with a diamond-tipped knife, stained
with Reynold's lead citrate, and imaged by electron microscopy.
DLS
Since Brownian motion is determined by particle size, the temporal
auto-correlation of light scattering decays at a rate that depends inversely on
particle size, allowing inference of particle size (HD). For each assay,
purified virions (10 µL) were fixed immediately (untreated control) or
incubated at 37°C or 25°C as indicated prior to fixation, kept >1
h at room temperature, diluted 1:10 in ultrapure water, placed in a disposable
polystyrene low-volume cuvette for DLS, and analyzed in a Malvern Zetasizer
NanoZS device. Water viscosity was assumed for particle sizing, and all
measurements were taken at 25°C. Control assays were performed to ensure
that fixation/dilution did not modify the particle size distribution compared to
non-fixed virions. In aggregation inhibition assays, all tested inhibitors
(trypsin, PLC, PLA1A, annexin V, or RAP) were previously diluted 1/5 in a buffer
mimicking the composition of the buffer of the VSV purified virions (iodixanol
24%, NaCl 0.3%, Tris 0.7%, EDTA.Na2.2H20 0.02%, pH 7.4) to
ensure that the observed changes in aggregation were not due to differences in
the buffers used, and 1 µL of this dilution was added to a purified
virion aliquot (10 µL) immediately before incubation at 37°C. In
these assays, additional controls were included in which the reagents were added
post-fixation to ensure that no changes in DLS measurements were observed. Data
were analyzed by the cumulants method, which allows inference of the average
particle HD from the first-order auto-correlation decay rate, and of particle HD
variance from the second-order decay rate38. Following manufacturer’s recommendations, mean HD was
quantified using the z-average, defined as the harmonic intensity averaged HD
(also known as cumulants mean), and HD variance was quantified using the
polydispersity index. The distribution of light scattering intensity as a
function of particle size, as provided by the Zetasizer software, was exported
to a plain text file and graphed.
Nanoparticle tracking analysis
This technique is based on video tracking the light diffraction of
individual nanoparticles to characterize their Brownian motion and infer their
size. Purified virions were loaded into a NanoSight NS300 equipment (Malvern)
with the aid of a syringe pump to increase particle flow through the chamber,
and analyzed by built-in software using default parameters.
Centrifugation assays
Purified virions were incubated at 37°C or 4°C (untreated
controls) in separate 8 µL aliquots, mixed with 92 μL DMEM 1X, and
centrifuged once at the indicated speeds. The supernatant (S) was collected for
titration, and the pellet was washed once with 1 mL DMEM 1X using the same
centrifugation speed and time, and then resuspended in 100 μL DMEM 1X
(P), after discarding the supernatant. The S and P fractions were titrated by
the plaque assay, and the fraction of PFUs in the pellet was calculated as the
P/S titer ratio.
Flow cytometry and co-fluorescence test
VSV-mCherry and VSV-GFP virions were co-incubated as indicated, serially
diluted in DMEM 1X, and used to inoculate a monolayer of approximately 3
× 106 confluent BHK-21 cells. For untreated controls,
VSV-mCherry and VSV-GFP were serially diluted separately and then used to infect
BHK-21 cells, such that co-infection should only take place if two virions
entered independently in the same cell. After 45 min incubation of the inoculum
(37°C and 5% CO2), cultures were overlaid with DMEM 1X
supplemented with 2% FBS and incubated for 7 h. Based on the growth dynamics of
VSV in BHK-21 cells, this should allow for only one cell infection cycle.
However, since growth is not perfectly synchronous, initiation of a second cycle
probably occurred in some cases. Additionally, GFP and mCherry proteins may
diffuse to other cells. In any case, these potential problems would lead to
underestimating aggregation, because a fraction of these second-cycle cells
might receive only one of the variants despite the initial cell being
co-infected by the two variants. Cells were then detached using trypsin-EDTA,
resuspended in DMEM 1X containing 10% FBS, washed with PBS 1X by centrifugation
(1500 rpm, 5 min), resuspended in 1 mL 4% paraformaldehyde for fixation, and
incubated overnight at 4°C. The fixator was removed and washed with PBS
1X by centrifugation (700 rpm, 10 min, twice), cells were resuspended in PBS 1X
at a density of ca. 106 cells/mL, and 105 events per
sample were analyzed in a Becton Dickinson LSRFortessa flow cytometer equipped
with 488 nm and 561 nm lasers for GFP and mCherry excitation, respectively.
Controls of non-infected cultures as well as of cultures singly infected with
VSV-mCherry or VSV-GFP were run in parallel and used to delineate quadrants
manually. Cell counts were used to infer the fraction of virions bound to other
virions in the inoculum, as detailed in Supplementary Fig. 3.
MAb neutralization assays
Aliquots of purified VSV-A3853C virions (5 µL) were mixed with
different volumes of VSV-GFP as indicated, maintained at 37°C for 2 h,
serially diluted, and used for plaque assays in which the infected cells were
cultured with 10% (v:v) of a MAb -containing stock obtained directly from a
mouse hybridoma supernatant. A control plaque assay without MAb was run in
parallel. In additional experiments, virion mixes were incubated at 37°C
for 2 h, treated with one volume of the MAb suspension (25°C, 30 min),
and used for plaque assays in the absence of the MAb. Cultures were fixed and
stained as indicated above (plaque assays).
Statistical notes
Names of statistical tests and the number of replicate assays are shown
in the text or figure legends. All tests were two-sided. The numbers of
replicate assays were not chosen to ensure a particular statistical power or
detect pre-specified effect sizes. No samples were excluded from the analysis.
No randomization methods were required to allocate or process experimental
groups, and no blinding was used. Wherein indicated, log transformation of data
was used. This is recommended for use of parametrical tests when data span
several orders of magnitude and have asymmetrical definition intervals (e.g.
viral titers). The SEM was used to estimate variation within each data group, or
raw data points are shown alternatively. Normality tests were not implemented
because they show low statistical power for small datasets as those used here
and are thus non-informative (t-tests are robust to deviations from normality).
As a conservative approach, unequal variances were assumed in all tests.
Data availability
Relevant data are with the manuscript and associated supplementary
information. No new protein, DNA, or RNA sequence data, macromolecular
structures, crystallographic data or microarray data requiring deposition in
public repository were produced.
Authors: Lucie Kalvodova; Julio L Sampaio; Sandra Cordo; Christer S Ejsing; Andrej Shevchenko; Kai Simons Journal: J Virol Date: 2009-05-27 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Charles F C Scherer; Vivian O'Donnell; William T Golde; Douglas Gregg; D Mark Estes; Luis L Rodriguez Journal: Vet Res Date: 2007-03-13 Impact factor: 3.683
Authors: Paul F Smith; Elizabeth W Howerth; Deborah Carter; Elmer W Gray; Raymond Noblet; Roy D Berghaus; David E Stallknecht; Daniel G Mead Journal: BMC Vet Res Date: 2012-10-03 Impact factor: 2.741
Authors: Marianita Santiana; Sourish Ghosh; Brian A Ho; Vignesh Rajasekaran; Wen-Li Du; Yael Mutsafi; Dennise A De Jésus-Diaz; Stanislav V Sosnovtsev; Eric A Levenson; Gabriel I Parra; Peter M Takvorian; Ann Cali; Christopher Bleck; Anastasia N Vlasova; Linda J Saif; John T Patton; Patrizia Lopalco; Angela Corcelli; Kim Y Green; Nihal Altan-Bonnet Journal: Cell Host Microbe Date: 2018-08-08 Impact factor: 21.023
Authors: Nono S C Merleau; Sophie Pénisson; Philip J Gerrish; Santiago F Elena; Matteo Smerlak Journal: PLoS Comput Biol Date: 2021-07-08 Impact factor: 4.475