Literature DB >> 34237053

Why are viral genomes so fragile? The bottleneck hypothesis.

Nono S C Merleau1, Sophie Pénisson2,3, Philip J Gerrish4, Santiago F Elena5,6, Matteo Smerlak1.   

Abstract

If they undergo new mutations at each replication cycle, why are RNA viral genomes so fragile, with most mutations being either strongly deleterious or lethal? Here we provide theoretical and numerical evidence for the hypothesis that genetic fragility is partly an evolutionary response to the multiple population bottlenecks experienced by viral populations at various stages of their life cycles. Modelling within-host viral populations as multi-type branching processes, we show that mutational fragility lowers the rate at which Muller's ratchet clicks and increases the survival probability through multiple bottlenecks. In the context of a susceptible-exposed-infectious-recovered epidemiological model, we find that the attack rate of fragile viral strains can exceed that of more robust strains, particularly at low infectivities and high mutation rates. Our findings highlight the importance of demographic events such as transmission bottlenecks in shaping the genetic architecture of viral pathogens.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34237053     DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol        ISSN: 1553-734X            Impact factor:   4.475


  56 in total

1.  Transmission bottlenecks as determinants of virulence in rapidly evolving pathogens.

Authors:  C T Bergstrom; P McElhany; L A Real
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Selection for fitness versus selection for robustness in RNA secondary structure folding.

Authors:  C O Wilke
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Selection for thermostability can lead to the emergence of mutational robustness in an RNA virus.

Authors:  P Domingo-Calap; M Pereira-Gómez; R Sanjuán
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 2.411

4.  An experimental test of the independent action hypothesis in virus-insect pathosystems.

Authors:  Mark P Zwart; Lia Hemerik; Jenny S Cory; J Arjan G M de Visser; Felix J J A Bianchi; Monique M Van Oers; Just M Vlak; Rolf F Hoekstra; Wopke Van der Werf
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Costs and benefits of mutational robustness in RNA viruses.

Authors:  Adi Stern; Simone Bianco; Ming Te Yeh; Caroline Wright; Kristin Butcher; Chao Tang; Rasmus Nielsen; Raul Andino
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 9.423

6.  Efficient escape from local optima in a highly rugged fitness landscape by evolving RNA virus populations.

Authors:  Héctor Cervera; Jasna Lalić; Santiago F Elena
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  One is enough: in vivo effective population size is dose-dependent for a plant RNA virus.

Authors:  Mark P Zwart; José-Antonio Daròs; Santiago F Elena
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 6.823

8.  Neutral quasispecies evolution and the maximal entropy random walk.

Authors:  M Smerlak
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 14.136

9.  Within-host spatiotemporal dynamics of plant virus infection at the cellular level.

Authors:  Nicolas Tromas; Mark P Zwart; Guillaume Lafforgue; Santiago F Elena
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Viral quasispecies.

Authors:  Esteban Domingo; Celia Perales
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.