Literature DB >> 28528791

MicroCT-based finite element models as a tool for virtual testing of cortical bone.

Masoud Ramezanzadehkoldeh1, Bjørn H Skallerud2.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess a virtual biomechanics testing approach purely based on microcomputed tomography (microCT or µCT) data, providing non-invasive methods for determining the stiffness and strength of cortical bone. Mouse femurs were µCT scanned prior to three-point-bend tests. Then microCT-based finite element models were generated with spatial variation in bone elastoplastic properties and subject-specific femur geometries. Empirical relationships of density versus Young's moduli and yield stress were used in assigning elastoplastic properties to each voxel. The microCT-based finite element modeling (µFEM) results were employed to investigate the model's accuracy through comparison with experimental tests. The correspondence of elastic stiffness and strength from the µFE analyses and tests was good. The interpretation of the derived data showed a 6.1%, 1.4%, 1.5%, and 1.6% difference between the experimental test result and µFEM output on global stiffness, nominal Young's modulus, nominal yield stress, and yield force, respectively. We conclude that virtual testing outputs could be used to predict global elastic-plastic properties and may reduce the cost, time, and number of test specimens in performing physical experiments.
Copyright © 2017 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanical testing; Femur; MicroCT-based FEM; Virtual testing

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28528791     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.04.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  6 in total

1.  Finite element analysis of bone strength in osteogenesis imperfecta.

Authors:  Peter Varga; Bettina M Willie; Chris Stephan; Kenneth M Kozloff; Philippe K Zysset
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Optimizing Accuracy of Proximal Femur Elastic Modulus Equations.

Authors:  Asghar Rezaei; Kent D Carlson; Hugo Giambini; Samad Javid; Dan Dragomir-Daescu
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 3.  Patient-Specific Bone Multiscale Modelling, Fracture Simulation and Risk Analysis-A Survey.

Authors:  Amadeus C S de Alcântara; Israel Assis; Daniel Prada; Konrad Mehle; Stefan Schwan; Lucia Costa-Paiva; Munir S Skaf; Luiz C Wrobel; Paulo Sollero
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 4.  Multiscale finite element modeling of mechanical strains and fluid flow in osteocyte lacunocanalicular system.

Authors:  Thiagarajan Ganesh; Loretta E Laughrey; Mohammadmehdi Niroobakhsh; Nuria Lara-Castillo
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Correlation of Bone Material Model Using Voxel Mesh and Parametric Optimization.

Authors:  Kamil Pietroń; Łukasz Mazurkiewicz; Kamil Sybilski; Jerzy Małachowski
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 3.748

6.  Is the 0.2%-Strain-Offset Approach Appropriate for Calculating the Yield Stress of Cortical Bone?

Authors:  Guanjun Zhang; Junjie Luo; Gang Zheng; Zhonghao Bai; Libo Cao; Haojie Mao
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.934

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.