Literature DB >> 28526953

Mutual interference between adult females of Galendromus flumenis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) feeding on eggs of Banks grass mite decreases predation efficiency and increases emigration rate.

Fatemeh Ganjisaffar1, Gösta Nachman2, Thomas M Perring3.   

Abstract

The Banks grass mite, Oligonychus pratensis (Banks) (Acari: Tetranychidae) causes significant damage to dates in California (USA), if not controlled. Studies are underway to develop biological control strategies against this pest in dates using the predatory mite Galendromus flumenis (Chant) (Acari: Phytoseiidae). In California date gardens, this predator is found in low numbers that are insufficient for the economic suppression of Banks grass mites, and our research aims to understand why it fails to keep up with prey densities. The hypothesis that prey density and predator interference interactively determine the predation efficiency of G. flumenis was tested. In addition, the effect of arena size and prey and predator density manipulations on the emigration rate of the predator was investigated. Our results indicate that the per capita predation rate of G. flumenis decreases steeply with increasing predator density due to mutual interference. Analysis of emigration data considering the arena size and predator numbers showed that the emigration rate of G. flumenis was higher from small arenas, and increased with increasing predator numbers. When emigration data were analyzed using prey and predator densities as independent variables, only the effect of predator density was significant, suggesting that higher predator density increases the emigration rate of G. flumenis. These results contribute to our understanding of the predator-prey interactions, and help in designing strategies for more efficient augmentative releases of G. flumenis.

Keywords:  Biological control; Intraspecific competition; Oligonychus pratensis; Predation rate

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28526953     DOI: 10.1007/s10493-017-0138-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol        ISSN: 0168-8162            Impact factor:   2.132


  17 in total

1.  The nature of predation: prey dependent, ratio dependent or neither?

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Effect of Mutual Interference on the Ability of Spalangia cameroni (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) to Attack and Parasitize Pupae of Stomoxys calcitrans (Diptera: Muscidae).

Authors:  H Skovgård; G Nachman
Journal:  Environ Entomol       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 2.377

3.  A functional response model of a predator population foraging in a patchy habitat.

Authors:  Gösta Nachman
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.091

4.  Functional responses modified by predator density.

Authors:  Pavel Kratina; Matthijs Vos; Andrew Bateman; Bradley R Anholt
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  New inductive population model for insect parasites and its bearing on biological control.

Authors:  M P Hassell; G C Varley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1969-09-13       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The effects of prey patchiness, predator aggregation, and mutual interference on the functional response of Phytoseiulus persimilis feeding on Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Phytoseiidae, Tetranychidae).

Authors:  Gösta Nachman
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.132

7.  Evaluation of prey-stage preference as an indicator of life-style type in phytoseiid mites.

Authors:  J S Blackwood; H K Luh; B A Croft
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.132

Review 8.  Cannibalism among phytoseiid mites: a review.

Authors:  Peter Schausberger
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.380

9.  Mutual interference is common and mostly intermediate in magnitude.

Authors:  John P Delong; David A Vasseur
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 2.964

10.  Does Mutual Interference Affect the Feeding Rate of Aphidophagous Coccinellids? A Modeling Perspective.

Authors:  Nikos E Papanikolaou; Nikos Demiris; Panagiotis G Milonas; Simon Preston; Theodore Kypraios
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.