Literature DB >> 17009758

A functional response model of a predator population foraging in a patchy habitat.

Gösta Nachman1.   

Abstract

1. Functional response models (e.g. Holling's disc equation) that do not take the spatial distributions of prey and predators into account are likely to produce biased estimates of predation rates. 2. To investigate the consequences of ignoring prey distribution and predator aggregation, a general analytical model of a predator population occupying a patchy environment with a single species of prey is developed. 3. The model includes the density and the spatial distribution of the prey population, the aggregative response of the predators and their mutual interference. 4. The model provides explicit solutions to a number of scenarios that can be independently combined: the prey has an even, random or clumped distribution, and the predators show a convex, sigmoid, linear or no aggregative response. 5. The model is parameterized with data from an acarine predator-prey system consisting of Phytoseiulus persimis and Tetranychus urticae inhabiting greenhouse cucumbers. 6. The model fits empirical data quite well and much better than if prey and predators were assumed to be evenly distributed among patches, or if the predators were distributed independently of the prey. 7. The analyses show that if the predators do not show an aggregative response it will always be an advantage to the prey to adopt a patchy distribution. On the other hand, if the predators are capable of responding to the distribution of prey, then it will be an advantage to the prey to be evenly distributed when its density is low and switch to a more patchy distribution when its density increases. The effect of mutual interference is negligible unless predator density is very high. 8. The model shows that prey patchiness and predator aggregation in combination can change the functional response at the population level from type II to type III, indicating that these factors may contribute to stabilization of predator-prey dynamics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17009758     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01114.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  9 in total

1.  Predator-prey relationships in a Mediterranean vertebrate system: Bonelli's eagles, rabbits and partridges.

Authors:  Marcos Moleón; José A Sánchez-Zapata; José M Gil-Sánchez; Elena Ballesteros-Duperón; José M Barea-Azcón; Emilio Virgós
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Roles of spatial partitioning, competition, and predation in the North American invasion of an exotic mosquito.

Authors:  T Z Freed; P T Leisnham
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Space race functional responses.

Authors:  Henrik Sjödin; Åke Brännström; Göran Englund
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Diverse foraging opportunities drive the functional response of local and landscape-scale bear predation on Pacific salmon.

Authors:  Thomas P Quinn; Curry J Cunningham; Aaron J Wirsing
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Mutual interference between adult females of Galendromus flumenis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) feeding on eggs of Banks grass mite decreases predation efficiency and increases emigration rate.

Authors:  Fatemeh Ganjisaffar; Gösta Nachman; Thomas M Perring
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 2.132

6.  The effects of prey patchiness, predator aggregation, and mutual interference on the functional response of Phytoseiulus persimilis feeding on Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Phytoseiidae, Tetranychidae).

Authors:  Gösta Nachman
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.132

7.  Functional response of Euseius concordis feeding on Oligonychus ilicis (Acari: Phytoseiidae, Tetranychidae).

Authors:  Erika Carla da Silveira; Paulo Rebelles Reis; Melina Flávia Siqueira; Melissa Alves Toledo; Gilberto Rodrigues Liska; Marcelo Ângelo Cirillo
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 2.132

8.  Nonlinear effects of food aggregation on interference competition in mallards.

Authors:  Abel Gyimesi; Erica P van Rooij; Bart A Nolet
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  Linear functional response by two pupal Drosophila parasitoids foraging within single or multiple patch environments.

Authors:  Gülay Kaçar; Xin-Geng Wang; Antonio Biondi; Kent M Daane
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.