Literature DB >> 15560524

Evaluation of prey-stage preference as an indicator of life-style type in phytoseiid mites.

J S Blackwood1, H K Luh, B A Croft.   

Abstract

Discriminant analysis (DA) models were developed and applied to examine the use of prey-stage preference (Tetranychus urticae Koch egg versus larval prey) in the classification of phytoseiid mites into life-style types. Prey-stage preferences and developmental times when preying on T. urticae, and relative ovipositional rates on six food categories were determined for four phytoseiid species occurring on apple in central and eastern Oregon, USA: Galendromus flumenis (Chant), Galendromus occidentalis (Nesbitt), Metaseiulus citri (Garman and McGregor) and Typhlodromus caudiglans Schuster. In terms of all three aspects studied, the phytoseiid species showed a consistent polarization of G. occidentalis < or = G. flumenis < or = T. caudiglans < M. citri. Specifically, G. occidentalis ('The Dalles' strain) had a significant preference for eggs, G. flumenis had no preference, and T. caudiglans and M. citri had significant preferences for larvae; G. occidentalis had the shortest developmental time, followed by G. flumenis and T. caudiglans, while M. citri had the longest developmental time; and diet breadth was most narrow for G. occidentalis and progressively broader from G. flumenis, T. caudiglans through M. citri, which was able to sustain oviposition on the broadest range of prey and pollens. Species were classified somewhat differently depending on which traits were considered in a given DA. Prey-stage preference was not included as an indicator in the parsimonious DA model when all species and all traits were considered, but in general this trait performed well as an indicator alone (single-trait DA) and somewhat improved the classifications of multitrait discriminant analyses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15560524     DOI: 10.1023/b:appa.0000038623.75416.e3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol        ISSN: 0168-8162            Impact factor:   2.132


  6 in total

1.  Quantitative classification of life-style types in predaceous phytoseiid mites.

Authors:  H K Lu; B A Croft
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.132

2.  Life-styles of Phytoseiid mites and their roles in biological control.

Authors:  J A McMurtry; B A Croft
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 19.686

3.  Plant strategies of manipulating predatorprey interactions through allelochemicals: Prospects for application in pest control.

Authors:  M Dicke; M W Sabelis; J Takabayashi; J Bruin; M A Posthumus
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 4.  Phytoseiid dispersal at plant to regional levels: a review with emphasis on management of Neoseiulus fallacis in diverse agroecosystems.

Authors:  B A Croft; C Jung
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.132

5.  Phytoseiid mites on unsprayed apple trees in Oregon, and other western states (USA): distributions, life-style types and relevance to commercial orchards.

Authors:  B A Croft; H K Luh
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.132

Review 6.  Cannibalism among phytoseiid mites: a review.

Authors:  Peter Schausberger
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.380

  6 in total
  9 in total

Review 1.  Classifying life-style types of phytoseiid mites: diagnostic traits.

Authors:  B A Crofti; J S Blackwood; J A McMurtry
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.132

2.  Mutual interference between adult females of Galendromus flumenis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) feeding on eggs of Banks grass mite decreases predation efficiency and increases emigration rate.

Authors:  Fatemeh Ganjisaffar; Gösta Nachman; Thomas M Perring
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 2.132

3.  Phenology and structure of a phytoseiid community in an insecticide-free apple orchard.

Authors:  Rebecca A Schmidt-Jeffris; Elizabeth H Beers
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.132

4.  Prey-stage preferences and functional and numerical responses of Amblyseius largoensis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) to Raoiella indica (Acari: Tenuipalpidae).

Authors:  Daniel Carrillo; Jorge E Peña
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 2.132

5.  Suitability of food resources for Proprioseiopsis mexicanus, a potentially important natural enemy in eastern USA agroecosystems.

Authors:  Monica A Farfan; John Coffey; Rebecca A Schmidt-Jeffris
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 2.132

6.  Phytoseiid mites on unsprayed apple trees in Oregon, and other western states (USA): distributions, life-style types and relevance to commercial orchards.

Authors:  B A Croft; H K Luh
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.132

7.  Neoseiulus idaeus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) as a potential biocontrol agent of the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) in papaya: performance on different prey stage--host plant combinations.

Authors:  Karin F S Collier; Gilberto S Albuquerque; José O G de Lima; Angelo Pallini; Adrián J Molina-Rugama
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2007-01-20       Impact factor: 2.132

8.  Comparative biology and pesticide susceptibility of Amblydromella caudiglans and Galendromus occidentalis as spider mite predators in apple orchards.

Authors:  Rebecca A Schmidt-Jeffris; Elizabeth H Beers
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.132

9.  Functional response of Euseius concordis feeding on Oligonychus ilicis (Acari: Phytoseiidae, Tetranychidae).

Authors:  Erika Carla da Silveira; Paulo Rebelles Reis; Melina Flávia Siqueira; Melissa Alves Toledo; Gilberto Rodrigues Liska; Marcelo Ângelo Cirillo
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 2.132

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.