Literature DB >> 28526451

Interdelivery weight gain and risk of cesarean delivery following a prior vaginal delivery.

Annie M Dude1, Abbi D Lane-Cordova2, William A Grobman3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Approximately one third of all deliveries in the United States are via cesarean. Previous research indicates weight gain during pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery. It remains unclear, however, whether and to what degree weight gain between deliveries (ie, interdelivery weight gain) is associated with cesarean delivery in a subsequent pregnancy following a vaginal delivery.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to determine whether interdelivery weight gain is associated with an increased risk of intrapartum cesarean delivery following a vaginal delivery. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a case-control study of women who had 2 consecutive singleton births of at least 36 weeks' gestation between 2005 and 2016, with a vaginal delivery in the index pregnancy. Women were excluded if they had a contraindication to a trial of labor (eg, fetal malpresentation or placenta previa) in the subsequent pregnancy. Maternal characteristics and delivery outcomes for both pregnancies were abstracted from the medical record. Maternal weight gain between deliveries was measured as the change in body mass index at delivery. Women who underwent a subsequent cesarean delivery were compared with those who had a repeat vaginal delivery using χ2 statistics for categorical variables and Student t tests or analysis of variance for continuous variables. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine whether interdelivery weight gain remained independently associated with intrapartum cesarean delivery after adjusting for potential confounders.
RESULTS: Of 10,396 women who met eligibility criteria and had complete data, 218 (2.1%) had a cesarean delivery in the subsequent pregnancy. Interdelivery weight gain was significantly associated with cesarean delivery and remained significant in multivariable analysis for women with a body mass index increase of at least 2 kg/m2 (adjusted odds ratio, 1.53, 95% confidence interval, 1.03-2.27 for a body mass index increase of 2 kg/m2 to <4 kg/m2; adjusted odds ratio, 1.99, 95% confidence interval, 1.19-3.34 for body mass index increase of 4 kg/m2 or more). Furthermore, women who gained 2 kg/m2 or more were significantly more likely to undergo cesarean delivery specifically for the indications of arrest of dilation or arrest of descent (adjusted odds ratio, 2.01, 95% confidence interval, 1.21-3.33 for body mass index increase of 2 to <4 kg/m2; adjusted odds ratio, 2.34, 95% confidence interval, 1.15-4.76 for body mass index increase of ≥4 kg/m2). Contrarily, women who lost ≥2 kg/m2 were less likely to undergo any cesarean delivery (adjusted odds ratio, 0.41, 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.78) as well as less likely to undergo cesarean delivery for an arrest disorder (adjusted odds ratio, 0.29, 95% confidence interval, 0.10-0.82). Weight gain or loss was not significantly associated with a cesarean delivery for fetal indications.
CONCLUSION: Among women with a prior vaginal delivery, interdelivery weight gain was independently associated with an increased risk of intrapartum cesarean delivery in a subsequent pregnancy.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cesarean delivery; weight gain

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28526451      PMCID: PMC5581260          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  14 in total

1.  Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term.

Authors:  Shiliang Liu; Robert M Liston; K S Joseph; Maureen Heaman; Reg Sauve; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Postpartum Weight Retention and Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes.

Authors:  Sabrina Luke; Russell S Kirby; Lauri Wright
Journal:  J Perinat Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2016 Oct/Dec       Impact factor: 1.638

3.  Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999-2010.

Authors:  Katherine M Flegal; Margaret D Carroll; Brian K Kit; Cynthia L Ogden
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Maternal obesity: improving pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Priscilla M Nodine; Marie Hastings-Tolsma
Journal:  MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.412

5.  Interpregnancy body mass index change and success of term vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Lisa S Callegari; Lauren A Sterling; Sarah T Zelek; Stephen E Hawes; Susan D Reed
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Maternal death in the 21st century: causes, prevention, and relationship to cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Steven L Clark; Michael A Belfort; Gary A Dildy; Melissa A Herbst; Janet A Meyers; Gary D Hankins
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  The impact of interpregnancy weight change on birthweight in obese women.

Authors:  Arun P Jain; Jeffrey A Gavard; Jim J Rice; Rosemary B Catanzaro; Raul Artal; Sarah A Hopkins
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Interpregnancy weight gain and cesarean delivery risk in women with a history of gestational diabetes.

Authors:  Pathmaja Paramsothy; Yvonne S Lin; Mary A Kernic; Karen E Foster-Schubert
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 9.  Diet or exercise, or both, for preventing excessive weight gain in pregnancy.

Authors:  Benja Muktabhant; Theresa A Lawrie; Pisake Lumbiganon; Malinee Laopaiboon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-06-15

Review 10.  Pandemic of Pregnant Obese Women: Is It Time to Re-Evaluate Antenatal Weight Loss?

Authors:  Anne M Davis
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2015-08-20
View more
  3 in total

1.  Trends in maternal prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) and its association with birth and maternal outcomes in California, 2007-2016: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Anura W G Ratnasiri; Henry C Lee; Satyan Lakshminrusimha; Steven S Parry; Vivi N Arief; Ian H DeLacy; Jo-Shing Yang; Ralph J DiLibero; Julia Logan; Kaye E Basford
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Interpregnancy weight change and perinatal outcomes: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jose Alberto Martínez-Hortelano; Carlos Berlanga-Macías; Diana Patricia Pozuelo-Carrascosa; Gema Sanabria-Martínez; Raquel Poyatos-León; Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  The impact of interpregnancy weight change on perinatal outcomes in women and their children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yvon E G Timmermans; Kim D G van de Kant; Elise O Oosterman; Marc E A Spaanderman; Eduardo Villamor-Martinez; Jos Kleijnen; Anita C E Vreugdenhil
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 9.213

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.