Literature DB >> 24215856

Interpregnancy body mass index change and success of term vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.

Lisa S Callegari1, Lauren A Sterling2, Sarah T Zelek2, Stephen E Hawes2, Susan D Reed3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the effect of interpregnancy body mass index (BMI) change on success of term vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) among normal, overweight and obese women. STUDY
DESIGN: Using 1992-2009 Washington State birth certificate data linked with hospitalization records, we conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of nulliparous women (BMI ≥18.5 kg/m(2)) with a primary cesarean in their first birth and a term trial of labor in their second. Interpregnancy weight change (difference between first and second prepregnancy BMIs) was categorized as maintenance (<1 BMI unit change), loss (≥1 unit), moderate gain (≥1 and <2 units), high gain (≥2 units). We estimated relative risks of VBAC success using generalized linear models with a log-link function, adjusting for maternal age, race/ethnicity, nativity, marital status, education, smoking, primary cesarean indication, interpregnancy interval, birth year for second birth, and prenatal care adequacy.
RESULTS: Among 8302 women who attempted a term trial of labor, 65% had a successful VBAC. Women with normal BMI before their first pregnancy experienced an 8% decrease in VBAC success with moderate gain (relative risk [RR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-0.98) and a 12% decrease in success with high gain (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.83-0.93), compared with normal weight women who maintained weight. Weight loss increased VBAC success in women who were overweight (RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.01-1.25) or obese before their first delivery (RR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.04-1.49), compared with overweight and obese women, respectively, who maintained weight.
CONCLUSION: Women can improve their chance of successful VBAC through interpregnancy weight management. Published by Mosby, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  VBAC; body mass index; interpregnancy weight change; obesity; vaginal birth after cesarean

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24215856     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.11.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  5 in total

1.  Interpregnancy weight change and adverse maternal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Chelsea Lynes; Alexander C McLain; Edwina H Yeung; Paul Albert; Jihong Liu; Nansi S Boghossian
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.797

2.  Interdelivery weight gain and risk of cesarean delivery following a prior vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Annie M Dude; Abbi D Lane-Cordova; William A Grobman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Obesity in Pregnancy: Optimizing Outcomes for Mom and Baby.

Authors:  Heidi Dutton; Sarah Jean Borengasser; Laura Marie Gaudet; Linda A Barbour; Erin Joanne Keely
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.456

4.  Prediction of odds for emergency cesarean section: A secondary analysis of the CHILD term birth cohort study.

Authors:  Mon H Tun; Radha Chari; Padma Kaul; Fabiana V Mamede; Mike Paulden; Diana L Lefebvre; Stuart E Turvey; Theo J Moraes; Malcolm R Sears; Padmaja Subbarao; Piush J Mandhane
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Factors Associated with Cesarean Section in Tehran, Iran using Multilevel Logistic Regression Model.

Authors:  Payam Amini; Maryam Mohammadi; Reza Omani-Samani; Amir Almasi-Hashiani; Saman Maroufizadeh
Journal:  Osong Public Health Res Perspect       Date:  2018-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.