Literature DB >> 28523364

[Structured patient handovers in perioperative medicine : Rationale and implementation in clinical practice].

M J Merkel1, V von Dossow2, B Zwißler1.   

Abstract

Clear and consistent communication is pivotal for well-functioning teamwork, in operating theatres as well as intensive care units. However, patient handovers significantly vary between specialties and locations. If communication is not well structured, it might increase the risk for mishaps and malpractice. Therefore, implementing structured handover protocols is pivotal. The perioperative setting is a high-risk environment that is prone to communication failures due to operational design (frequent change of shift due to working time restrictions) and a high work load and multitasking (operating room management, short surgery times, concurrent emergencies). Hence teamwork in the operating room and intensive care unit requires clear and consistent communication. In the perioperative setting, the patient is transferred several times: from the ward to operating room, to recovery, intermediate care/intensive care unit and back to normal ward. This necessitates multiple handovers. Since 2005, the World Health Organization (WHO) requests a structured handover concept that processes all relevant information in a predefined order. The SBAR concept (situation, background, assessment, recommendation) is an intuitive communication concept that can improve quality of patient handovers. This underlines the clinical relevance of a structured handover concept that leads to improved outcomes for every patient.In this review, basic measures for a clear and consistent communication are presented. These are pivotal for an effective teamwork and for ensuing patient safety. Furthermore, we will focus on possibilities to implement structured approaches but also on potential barriers of implementation. Communication failure among different health care providers can be identified more easily and hopefully can be eliminated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Communication tool; Implementation; Patient safety; Potential barriers; SBAR

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28523364     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-017-0320-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  31 in total

1.  Association between implementation of a medical team training program and surgical mortality.

Authors:  Julia Neily; Peter D Mills; Yinong Young-Xu; Brian T Carney; Priscilla West; David H Berger; Lisa M Mazzia; Douglas E Paull; James P Bagian
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  The teaching of a structured tool improves the clarity and content of interprofessional clinical communication.

Authors:  S Marshall; J Harrison; B Flanagan
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2009-04

3.  Improving measurement in clinical handover.

Authors:  S A Jeffcott; S M Evans; P A Cameron; G S M Chin; J E Ibrahim
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2009-08

4.  Standardized multidisciplinary protocol improves handover of cardiac surgery patients to the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Brian F Joy; Emily Elliott; Courtney Hardy; Christine Sullivan; Carl L Backer; Jason M Kane
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.624

5.  Integration of a formalized handoff system into the surgical curriculum: resident perspectives and early results.

Authors:  Dana A Telem; Kerri E Buch; Steven Ellis; Brian Coakley; Celia M Divino
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2011-01

6.  Effectiveness of an Adapted SBAR Communication Tool for a Rehabilitation Setting.

Authors:  Karima Velji; G Ross Baker; Carol Fancott; Angie Andreoli; Nancy Boaro; Gaétan Tardif; Elaine Aimone; Lynne Sinclair
Journal:  Healthc Q       Date:  2008

7.  SBAR improves nurse-physician communication and reduces unexpected death: a pre and post intervention study.

Authors:  K De Meester; M Verspuy; K G Monsieurs; P Van Bogaert
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 5.262

8.  "HAND ME AN ISOBAR": a pilot study of an evidence-based approach to improving shift-to-shift clinical handover.

Authors:  Kwang C Yee; Ming C Wong; Paul Turner
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 7.738

9.  Examining the feasibility and utility of an SBAR protocol in long-term care.

Authors:  Susan M Renz; Marie P Boltz; Laura M Wagner; Elizabeth A Capezuti; Thomas E Lawrence
Journal:  Geriatr Nurs       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 2.361

10.  What stops hospital clinical staff from following protocols? An analysis of the incidence and factors behind the failure of bedside clinical staff to activate the rapid response system in a multi-campus Australian metropolitan healthcare service.

Authors:  Bill Shearer; Stuart Marshall; Michael David Buist; Monica Finnigan; Simon Kitto; Tonina Hore; Tamica Sturgess; Stuart Wilson; Wayne Ramsay
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 7.035

View more
  2 in total

1.  [Multiprofessional management of delirium : A challenge-not only for intensivists].

Authors:  Thomas Saller
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Implementation of strategies to prevent and treat postoperative delirium in the post-anesthesia caring unit : A German survey of current practice.

Authors:  Thomas Saller; Klaus F Hofmann-Kiefer; Isabel Saller; Bernhard Zwissler; Vera von Dossow
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-05-09       Impact factor: 2.502

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.