Literature DB >> 23537699

SBAR improves nurse-physician communication and reduces unexpected death: a pre and post intervention study.

K De Meester1, M Verspuy, K G Monsieurs, P Van Bogaert.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Joint Commission International Patient Safety Goal 2 states that effective communication between health care workers needs to improve. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of SBAR (situation, background, assessment, recommendation) on the incidence of serious adverse events (SAE's) in hospital wards.
METHOD: In 16 hospital wards nurses were trained to use SBAR to communicate with physicians in cases of deteriorating patients. A pre (July 2010 and April 2011) and post (June 2011 and March 2012) intervention study was performed. Patient records were checked for SBAR items up to 48 h before a SAE. A questionnaire was used to measure nurse-physician communication and collaboration.
RESULTS: During 37,239 admissions 207 SAE's occurred and were checked for SBAR items, 425 nurses were questioned. Post intervention all four SBAR elements were notated more frequently in patient records in case of a SAE (from 4% to 35%; p<0.001), total score on the questionnaire increased in nurses (from 58 (range 31-97) to 64 (range 25-97); p<0.001), the number of unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admissions increased (from 13.1/1000 to 14.8/1000 admissions; relative risk ratio (RRR)=50%; 95% CI 30-64; p=0.001) and unexpected deaths decreased (from 0.99/1000 to 0.34/1000 admissions; RRR=-227%; 95% CI -793 to -20; NNT 1656; p<0.001). There was no difference in the number of cardiac arrest team calls.
CONCLUSION: After introducing SBAR we found increased perception of effective communication and collaboration in nurses, an increase in unplanned ICU admissions and a decrease in unexpected deaths.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Inter-professional communication; Rapid response system; SBAR; Serious adverse event; Un-expected death; Unplanned intensive care unit admission

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23537699     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.03.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  36 in total

1.  Interpersonal And Organizational Dynamics Are Key Drivers Of Failure To Rescue.

Authors:  Margaret E Smith; Emily E Wells; Christopher R Friese; Sarah L Krein; Amir A Ghaferi
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  The Effects of Nursing Satisfaction and Turnover Cognitions on Patient Attitudes and Outcomes: A Three-Level Multisource Study.

Authors:  Sara Jansen Perry; Jason P Richter; Brad Beauvais
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  [Structured patient handovers in perioperative medicine : Rationale and implementation in clinical practice].

Authors:  M J Merkel; V von Dossow; B Zwißler
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Recommendations of the German Association of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) on structured patient handover in the perioperative setting : The SBAR concept.

Authors:  V von Dossow; B Zwissler
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Bedside Nurses' Perceptions of Effective Nurse-Physician Communication in General Medical Units: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Hirotaka Kato; Jessica M Clouser; Preetham Talari; Nikita L Vundi; Akosua K Adu; Kishore Karri; Kathy B Isaacs; Mark V Williams; Romil Chadha; Jing Li
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-24

6.  Implementation of a Communication Bundle for High-Risk Patients.

Authors:  Michelle W Parker; Matthew Carroll; Benjamin Bolser; Janelle Ballinger; John Brewington; Suzanne Campanella; Andrew Davis-Sandfoss; Karen Tucker; Patrick W Brady
Journal:  Hosp Pediatr       Date:  2017-09

7.  [Recommendations of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine on structured patient handover in the perioperative phase : SBAR concept].

Authors:  V von Dossow; B Zwissler
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.041

8.  The implementation of a professional practice model to improve the nurse work environment in a Dutch hospital: A quasi-experimental study.

Authors:  Janet Bloemhof; Jeannette Knol; Marjon Van Rijn; Bianca M Buurman
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 3.057

9.  SBAR improves communication and safety climate and decreases incident reports due to communication errors in an anaesthetic clinic: a prospective intervention study.

Authors:  Maria Randmaa; Gunilla Mårtensson; Christine Leo Swenne; Maria Engström
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 10.  [Adult advanced life support].

Authors:  Jasmeet Soar; Bernd W Böttiger; Pierre Carli; Keith Couper; Charles D Deakin; Therese Djärv; Carsten Lott; Theresa Olasveengen; Peter Paal; Tommaso Pellis; Gavin D Perkins; Claudio Sandroni; Jerry P Nolan
Journal:  Notf Rett Med       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 0.826

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.