| Literature DB >> 28521775 |
Ani Manichaikul1,2,3, Xin-Qun Wang4, Li Sun5, Josée Dupuis6,7, Alain C Borczuk8, Jennifer N Nguyen9, Ganesh Raghu10, Eric A Hoffman11, Suna Onengut-Gumuscu9, Emily A Farber9, Joel D Kaufman12, Dan Rabinowitz13, Karen D Hinckley Stukovsky14, Steven M Kawut15, Gary M Hunninghake16, George R Washko16, George T O'Connor7,17, Stephen S Rich9, R Graham Barr5,18, David J Lederer5,18.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of subclinical interstitial lung disease (ILD), defined as high attenuation areas (HAA) on CT, in the population-based Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis Study.Entities:
Keywords: Epidemiology; Genetics; Genome-wide association study; Interstitial lung disease
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28521775 PMCID: PMC5437638 DOI: 10.1186/s12931-017-0581-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Respir Res ISSN: 1465-9921
Characteristics of participants in the MESA Fibrosis Lung/SHARe Study
| White | African American | Hispanic | Chinese | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participant characteristicsa | ||||
| No. subjects | 2434 | 2470 | 2065 | 702 |
| Women | 1267 (52.1) | 1381 (55.9) | 1115 (54.0) | 355 (50.6) |
| Age, years | 63 [54, 71] | 60 [53, 68] | 60 [53, 68] | 63 [54, 71] |
| Height, cm | 168.7 [161.7, 176.2] | 168.0 [161.1, 175.7] | 161.1 [155.3, 169.0] | 161.6 [154.9, 168.0] |
| Weight, lbs | 172.4 [148.0, 198.5] | 186.0 [161.0, 214.2] | 168.0 [146.5, 190.5] | 136.2 [121.3, 152.5] |
| Weight > 220 (yes/no) | 302 (12.4) | 519 (21.0) | 173 (8.4) | 0 (0) |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 27.1 [24.2, 30.4] | 29.4 [26.1, 33.7] | 28.6 [26.0, 32.2] | 23.7 [21.7, 26.0] |
| Diabetes (yes/no) | 284 (11.7) | 384 (15.6) | 333 (16.1) | 117 (16.7) |
| Hypertension (yes/no) | 935 (38.4) | 1473 (59.6) | 864 (41.8) | 263 (37.5) |
| Ever-smoke (yes/no) | 1345 (55.3) | 1297 (52.5) | 927 (44.9) | 176 (25.1) |
| Current-smoke (yes/no) | 269 (11.4) | 471 (19.2) | 280 (13.7) | 39 (5.6) |
| Pack-years of smokingb | 18.8 [6.5, 37.5] | 15.0 [6.5, 28.0] | 8.8 [3.0, 22.2] | 13.7 [4.4, 26.3] |
| Cigarettes per dayb | 15 [9, 20] | 10 [5, 20] | 6 [2,13.3] | 10 [7, 15] |
| Asthma (yes/no) | 251 (10.3) | 280 (11.3) | 219 (10.6) | 42 (6.0) |
| Measures of HAA | ||||
| No. subjects | 2434 | 2470 | 2065 | 702 |
| Percent HAA | 3.9 [3.3, 4.8] | 4.3 [3.6, 5.4] | 4.5 [3.7, 5.8] | 4.5 [3.8, 6.1] |
| Basilar percent HAA | 4.3 [3.4, 5.7] | 4.9 [3.8, 6.7] | 5.1 [4.0, 7.2] | 5.0 [3.8, 7.6] |
| Basilar peel-core ratio of HAA | 0.96 [0.84, 1.12] | 0.91 [0.80, 1.06] | 0.91 [0.80, 1.04] | 0.89 [0.78, 1.01] |
| Correlation of HAA traitsc | ||||
| Percent HAA:Basilar percent HAA | 0.944 | 0.927 | 0.944 | 0.961 |
| Percent HAA:Basilar peel-core ratio | 0.164 | 0.014 | 0.099 | 0.173 |
| Basilar percent HAA:Basilar peel-core ratio | 0.281 | 0.161 | 0.222 | 0.216 |
| Pulmonary functiona | ||||
| No. subjects | 1354 | 917 | 1012 | 562 |
| FEV1 (mL) | 2515 [2036, 3086] | 2130 [1726, 2608] | 2362 [1960, 2848] | 2167 [1724, 2588] |
| FVC (mL) | 3444 [2808, 4180] | 2808 [2321, 3515] | 3040 [2525, 3775] | 2856 [2313, 3470] |
| FEV1/FVC | 0.743 [0.690 0.786] | 0.768 [0.708, 0.809] | 0.782 [0.740, 0.817] | 0.764 [0.715, 0.805] |
Data are presented as n (%) for binary measures or median [IQR] for continuous measure
aSummary statistics are reported for the subset of individuals with data available for at least one of the HAA phenotypes
bPack-years of smoking are reported for ever-smokers only. Cigarettes per day are reported for current smokers only
cCorrelation of HAA phenotypes is computed using log-transformed phenotype values
Summary of genome-wide significant results in the GWAS
| Trait | Group | SNP ID | Chr | NCBI37 position | Nearest gene(s) | Effect/other allele | Effect allele freq.a | Beta | SE |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percent HAA | White | rs6844387 | 4 | 44,775,446 |
| A/G | 0.006 | 0.634 | 0.088 | 5.5E-13 |
| rs2894439 | 6 | 41,480,093 |
| A/G | 0.017 | 0.202 | 0.037 | 3.5E-08 | ||
| rs117323377 | 12 | 124,715,694 |
| G/A | 0.026 | 0.149 | 0.026 | 1.5E-08 | ||
| rs141944608 | 14 | 59,455,322 |
| T/C | 0.009 | 0.311 | 0.055 | 1.3E-08 | ||
| Chinese | rs79441543 | 10 | 3,132,994 |
| C/T | 0.048 | 0.615 | 0.097 | 2.8E-10 | |
| Basilar percent HAA | White | rs138384996 | 1 | 64,724,706 |
| A/G | 0.019 | 0.438 | 0.077 | 1.6E-08 |
| rs150536895 | 2 | 127,254,486 |
| A/G | 0.009 | 0.486 | 0.088 | 3.7E-08 | ||
| rs146792761 | 3 | 103,949,823 |
| T/G | 0.012 | 0.521 | 0.092 | 1.4E-08 | ||
| African | rs145855729 | 6 | 36,495,778 |
| T/C | 0.084 | 0.126 | 0.023 | 4.4E-08 | |
| rs114571830 | 8 | 32,973,995 |
| A/C | 0.024 | 0.227 | 0.041 | 2.6E-08 | ||
| rs149416017 | 14 | 55,227,152 |
| T/G | 0.011 | 0.411 | 0.074 | 3.2E-08 | ||
| Chinese | rs74361312 | 10 | 107,354,812 |
| G/C | 0.030 | 0.495 | 0.090 | 4.0E-08 | |
| Basilar peel-core ratio | White | rs76164182 | 1 | 8,291,827 |
| C/T | 0.018 | 0.210 | 0.038 | 3.2E-08 |
| rs114801796 | 1 | 93,408,101 |
| C/G | 0.017 | 0.221 | 0.040 | 4.4E-08 | ||
| rs190432524 | 5 | 179,742,263 |
| T/C | 0.009 | 0.318 | 0.048 | 5.4E-11 | ||
| rs182717611 | 18 | 12,955,146 |
| T/C | 0.020 | 0.170 | 0.031 | 4.7E-08 | ||
| African | rs150377334 | 8 | 71,177,444 |
| A/C | 0.009 | 0.238 | 0.039 | 7.6E-10 | |
| rs74315875 | 14 | 37,335,713 |
| G/C | 0.033 | 0.116 | 0.019 | 2.5E-09 | ||
| Meta-analysis | rs7852363 | 9 | 22,790,485 |
| T/C | 0.132/0.379/0.162/0.036 | 0.028 | 0.005 | 2.1E-09 | |
| rs140142658 | 16 | 88,732,573 |
| G/A | 0.016/-/0.019/- | 0.133 | 0.023 | 9.6E-09 | ||
| rs3079677 | 21 | 24,735,151 |
| T/TG | 0.430/0.311/0.446/0.578 | 0.024 | 0.004 | 2.3E-08 |
Results are presented based on the basic model of genetic association, including adjustment for age, sex, study site, principal components of ancestry, CT scanner, tube current, breath artifacts, height, weight, cigarettes per day (for current smokers only) and pack-years. Statistical association for rs6844387 also reached the genome-wide significance threshold for basilar percent HAA, but the association was stronger for percent HAA. aRace/ethnic-specific effect allele frequencies for meta-analysis are shown for White/African American/Hispanic/Chinese, and values omitted in cases that the association results did not pass race/ethnic-specific quality control filters prior to meta-analysis
Fig. 1Regional association plots for statistically significant GWAS regions identified in association with basilar peel-core ratio based on meta-analysis to combine results across race/ethnic groups in MESA. a Chromosome 9 region including FLJ35282, b Chromosome 16 region at SNAI3-AS1 and c Chromosome 21 region at D21S2088E. All plots are generated using the LocusZoom tool [36] with 1000 Genomes EUR (European ancestry) reference panel used for calculating linkage disequilibrium (LD). The x-axis shows position on the indicated chromosome in megabases (Mb), while the y-axis displays strength of association for each SNP as –log [10] p-value (left) and recombination rate at each genomic position (right). Genotyped SNPs are marked as crosses and imputed SNPs are shown as circles. The SNP indicated in purple is the index SNP, and other SNPs are color coded according to their linkage disequilibrium (R-squared) with the index SNP. LD for (c) is shown with respect to the SNP rs1504542 because LD information was not available for rs3079677 in the selected reference panel
Fig. 2mRNA expression in whole lung tissue for ANRIL, CDKN2B, ALCAM, and FOXP4 from 15 cases with IPF (red) and 15 controls (white) using quantitative real-time PCR normalized to expression of the reference gene GADPH. Results are presented as boxplots of the fold difference in expression in each IPF case or control normalized to the mean expression value among controls. Within each boxplot, the thick horizontal line represents the median fold difference, the ends of the boxplots are placed at the 25th and 75th percentiles (interquartile range), the whiskers extend to 1.5 x the interquartile range, and outliers are represented by open circles. Mean fold change (MFC) was calculated using the ΔΔCt method. P values are from Wilcoxon rank sum tests. The horizontal line at a value of 1 is the mean normalized expression value among controls
Fig. 3Expression of ANRIL (a long non-coding RNA) in UIP lung tissue. H&E stained tissue (left: panels a and c); in situ hybridization of ANRIL transcripts (right: panels b and d) for airway epithelium (top: panels a and b) versus fibroblastic foci (bottom: panels c and d). Note the pink dots (ANRIL transcripts) in airway epithelium (b) but not in fibroblastic foci (d). The photomicrograph is presented at x150 magnification