T Chandrasekar1, A Sharma2, L Tennent3, C Wong1, P Chamberlain4, K A Abraham1. 1. Nephrology Directorate, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool L9 7AL, UK. 2. Nephrology Directorate, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool L7 8XP, UK. 3. Administrative Services, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool L14 3PE, UK. 4. Innovation and Strategy, South Sefton CCG, Liverpool L20 3DL, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is in the main managed by non-nephrologists, many who feel challenged by or lack awareness of the complexity that the renal element adds to their patients' care. National reports have raised major concerns about the quality of care and have predicted that mortality reductions of 30% are achievable with good medical practice. AIM: This quality improvement project evaluated whether a whole system approach could improve outcomes for patients with AKI. DESIGN AND METHODS: Quality improvement methodology was used to understand hospital patterns, processes and professional knowledge. Change concepts were developed which included management of patients at risk, staff education and awareness program, development of a patient specific electronic alert to prompt diagnosis, easy to remember care bundle (ABCDE-IT), dedicated outreach team and patient and family empowerment leaflet. RESULTS: Statistical process control analysis was used to verify outcomes over time. A shift in the in-hospital mortality rate corresponded to a relative 23.2% reduction in mortality and was sustained over the next 33 months (P < 0.0001). The favourable shift in mortality was temporally distinct from the improved AKI detection rate. This timeframe corresponded to lying below the 99.8% lower confidence limit in comparison with all English acute trusts for comparative AKI specific SHMI/HSMR mortality rates. Length of stay also reduced shortly after onset of the project by 14.1% or 2.6 day reduction (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: This project demonstrated that an integrated, whole-system approach is necessary to ensure sustained improvements in AKI mortality and length of stay.
BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is in the main managed by non-nephrologists, many who feel challenged by or lack awareness of the complexity that the renal element adds to their patients' care. National reports have raised major concerns about the quality of care and have predicted that mortality reductions of 30% are achievable with good medical practice. AIM: This quality improvement project evaluated whether a whole system approach could improve outcomes for patients with AKI. DESIGN AND METHODS: Quality improvement methodology was used to understand hospital patterns, processes and professional knowledge. Change concepts were developed which included management of patients at risk, staff education and awareness program, development of a patient specific electronic alert to prompt diagnosis, easy to remember care bundle (ABCDE-IT), dedicated outreach team and patient and family empowerment leaflet. RESULTS: Statistical process control analysis was used to verify outcomes over time. A shift in the in-hospital mortality rate corresponded to a relative 23.2% reduction in mortality and was sustained over the next 33 months (P < 0.0001). The favourable shift in mortality was temporally distinct from the improved AKI detection rate. This timeframe corresponded to lying below the 99.8% lower confidence limit in comparison with all English acute trusts for comparative AKI specific SHMI/HSMR mortality rates. Length of stay also reduced shortly after onset of the project by 14.1% or 2.6 day reduction (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: This project demonstrated that an integrated, whole-system approach is necessary to ensure sustained improvements in AKI mortality and length of stay.
Authors: Etienne Macedo; Azra Bihorac; Edward D Siew; Paul M Palevsky; John A Kellum; Claudio Ronco; Ravindra L Mehta; Mitchell H Rosner; Michael Haase; Kianoush B Kashani; Erin F Barreto Journal: Eur J Intern Med Date: 2020-06-30 Impact factor: 4.487
Authors: Nicholas M Selby; Anna Casula; Laura Lamming; John Stoves; Yohan Samarasinghe; Andrew J Lewington; Russell Roberts; Nikunj Shah; Melanie Johnson; Natalie Jackson; Carol Jones; Erik Lenguerrand; Eileen McDonach; Richard J Fluck; Mohammed A Mohammed; Fergus J Caskey Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2019-02-21 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Anja Haase-Fielitz; Saban Elitok; Martin Schostak; Martin Ernst; Berend Isermann; Christian Albert; Bernt-Peter Robra; Andreas Kribben; Michael Haase Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2020-04-24 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Kathleen D Liu; Stuart L Goldstein; Anitha Vijayan; Chirag R Parikh; Kianoush Kashani; Mark D Okusa; Anupam Agarwal; Jorge Cerdá Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Chris Laing; Rosalind Raine; Alistair Connell; Hugh Montgomery; Peter Martin; Claire Nightingale; Omid Sadeghi-Alavijeh; Dominic King; Alan Karthikesalingam; Cian Hughes; Trevor Back; Kareem Ayoub; Mustafa Suleyman; Gareth Jones; Jennifer Cross; Sarah Stanley; Mary Emerson; Charles Merrick; Geraint Rees Journal: NPJ Digit Med Date: 2019-07-31
Authors: Hugh Montgomery; Christopher Laing; Alistair Connell; Rosalind Raine; Peter Martin; Estela Capelas Barbosa; Stephen Morris; Claire Nightingale; Omid Sadeghi-Alavijeh; Dominic King; Alan Karthikesalingam; Cían Hughes; Trevor Back; Kareem Ayoub; Mustafa Suleyman; Gareth Jones; Jennifer Cross; Sarah Stanley; Mary Emerson; Charles Merrick; Geraint Rees Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2019-07-15 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Alexander Komashie; James Ward; Tom Bashford; Terry Dickerson; Gulsum Kubra Kaya; Yuanyuan Liu; Isla Kuhn; Aslι Günay; Katharina Kohler; Nicholas Boddy; Eugenia O'Kelly; Joseph Masters; John Dean; Catherine Meads; P John Clarkson Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-01-19 Impact factor: 2.692